Jump to content

13-10

Member
  • Posts

    143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 13-10

  1. Have just been reading a bit of background on the Kuzma Minin

     

    Since May it had been stuck in Holland with unpaid bills, the crew have not been paid in months and were living off of handouts from the locals.The Mumansk Shipping Company who own the ship are under investigation in Russia.

     

    A ship owned by a bankrupt company with a demoralised crew isn't a particularly good combination

  2. 1 hour ago, Jokar said:

    Tonight I have started a Facebook  group called "Forth and Clyde  canal neglected" , can I ask everyone to join the group,  the purpose will be to try and put pressure  on Scottish  canals by showing support for the canal, it will also let folk share communication  and any progress made. Obviously  on this page we are all passionate  about our boating  but not enough folk can see your posts. I look forward  to seeing the join requests.

    Not finding it (admit I'm not that good with Facebook stuff). Maybe change it to Lowland Canals neglected

  3. 1 hour ago, AllanD said:

    Had a walk along the Forth Clyde canal today from Wynford Lock down past the Falkirk Wheel to lock14. Stopped for a bite to eat and watched the Wheel rotate. Only boat movements I saw was the Wheel trip boat, a Seagull Trust trip boat and one hired boat coming through lock 16.

    Very quiet for the holiday period with no private craft appearing to be on the move. 

    Is this a sign of things to come? 

    Nope. Quite a few boats including myself were down at the Kelpies last month

     Union is steady with boats, private and hire. I certainly plan to be on the F&C next year when the bridges are reopened. There's certainly positivity up here, hopefully that's reciprocated with the guys at the Glasgow end.

  4. 22 minutes ago, ditchcrawler said:

    Something else to dodge on the canals and rivers this summer probably packed with mum, dad and kids with not a life jacket between them, what could go wrong. I expect we will also get our share going out to sea here on the east coast keeping the lifeboat busy.

     

    Will make a change from rescuing kids on inflatable flamingos from Lidl

    IMG_20170717_140204667_BURST000_COVER.jpg

    • Greenie 1
  5. Interesting line in the report:

     

    The foreign suppliers identified so far assemble the throw bags using components from further suppliers

     

    It does't look as though RIBER had much quality control in place and limited record of a supply chain (to be fair I doubt they're alone on that front)

  6. On 08/05/2018 at 08:56, haggis said:

    We are moored above Shadehouse lock and after an indifferent meal in the Swan (I take back the nice things I said a few months ago as it has gone downhill again) I was sitting in the fore deck when my ankles were attacked by little skinny black beasties which bit like mad. I moved indoors. What were they? Much smaller than a horsefly (cleg) but equally viscous. My ankles are very itchy this morning despite several applications of After Bite. I

     

    Haggis 

    Could they be Blandford flies. Can remember them from my younger days, they were vicious buggers

    Image result for blandford fly

     

  7. 5 minutes ago, Iain_S said:

    The Union is built shallow at the edges; it's saucer in cross section rather than "U". I confirmed this  when I tried to use one of the "access points" to pull in to sort out a minor problem with Gamebird. 100 yards further on, however, there was no problem pulling in at the spot where I think there used to be a wharf. If the edge is vertical, it's OK; if the edging is sloping slabs, it's shallow! ( Ignoring for the meantime the weed, which in some places prevents getting within 6 feet of the towpath :) )

    Thanks Iain. Unfortunately on some of the vertical edges rocks from the side have fallen in, some are visible, some aren't (scout hut at the visitor mooring at Bridge 48 being one). I'm starting to get my eye in and not pulling quite so far in when passing(every day's a school day)

  8. 1 hour ago, Jokar said:

    Alan, there is no reason why the Forth and clyde is not in the same league as the Crinan,the stretch from Falkirk to Maryhill is everybit as good as  the Crinans scenery and inbetween there are  more places to stop over to get a meal or drink, then the engineering like the Kelpies, Falkirk wheel, and Dalmuir drop loch. If anything the f&c has more to offer the biggest issue is the amount of weed in the water, far more boats would transit west for the best sailing waters in the UK.  

    Union is no better (at least F&C is wide), in many places you can't get within 2ft of the bank without running aground on rocks which have fallen in from the canal wall 

  9. 1 hour ago, Up-Side-Down said:

    Found it: 'With 50 sea to sea transits last year on the Lowland canals and the temporary suspension of Bonnybridge and Twechar lift bridges affecting navigation, it makes good business sense to trial a different way of operating this year. This forms part of wider review of the way Scottish Canals can best meet customer demand with the resources available to us which also includes the proposed move to user operations on the Lowland canals in 2019'.

    Couldn't put it on as using my phone. Have trouble with cut and paste at the best of times?

  10. 1 hour ago, Alan de Enfield said:

    Ok - but if this is their annual grant that they would have got any way, and not 'extra' money - what is not going to be done that would have been done with the grant ?

     

     

    Hopefully no property development or new marinas. They've publicly been told what the money is meant for and not to be used in the way they have previously (I'm sure there are other folk on this forum with a better knowledge of that than me)

  11. Just now, Alan de Enfield said:

    Looks like good news for boaters - however every silver lining has a cloud around it.

     

    If Transport Scotland 'bail-out' Scottish Canals, what incentive is there for SC to do anything different in the future ?

    Another few years and it all happens again ....... "Don't worry Transport Scotland will bail us out again"

     

    And how / who will monitor it ?

    What penalties are applied when / if they don't meet their obligations ?

     

    But - it does look like short term good news.

    Alan,

     

    This is their annual grant from Government apparently, my understanding is the Transport Minister is reminding them what it has to be spent on. So keeping the Canal running rather than property speculation.

    The letter mentions releasing it in sections so would assume if they think SC are taking the piss again they can withhold payments. If nothing else it's public acknowledgement from the Government that they realise SC haven't been doing their job and are holding them to account.

     

  12. Afternoon all, below is a letter which has been received as part of a response from The Department of Transport to a member of the LCA

    Looks like there could be a bit of light at the end of the tunnel, apologies for the crappy cut and paste

     

    Mr Steve Dunlop    Chief Executive Scottish Canals Canal House 1 Applecross Street GLASGOW G4 9SP Our ref: A20730513 13 April 2018

     

    Dear Steve, BRITISH WATERWAYS/SCOTTISH CANALS: GRANT-IN-AID 2018-19 I am writing to formally confirm that Transport Scotland will make available grant-in-aid funding of up to £11.6 million to British Waterways trading as Scottish Canals (hereafter referred to as Scottish Canals) in financial year 2018-19. The funding will comprise resource grant of £8.1 million and capital grant of £3.5 million for assets that Scottish Canals capitalise. Any change within the financial year would be by agreement with Transport Scotland. The grant is paid by Transport Scotland to Scottish Canals under the Transport Act 1968 (as amended) to enable Scottish Canals to deliver its statutory functions to maintain and operate the canals for navigation. It may be used for the creation of new operational canal assets but may not be used in respect of Scottish Canals’ non-operational activity where it is acting commercially within the market. Transport Scotland will make monthly payments to Scottish Canals based on the presented claim profile from Scottish Canals, subject to the agreed grant allocation not being exceeded and grant not being drawn down in advance of need. Scottish Ministers expect Scottish Canals to be mindful of its statutory obligations and core public service function, and to deliver these competently. In particular Ministers expect Scottish Canals to ensure adequate funding is directed to maintenance of its operational assets. Ministers expect Scottish Canals to work in accordance with the agreed canals policy and, like all public bodies, meet the public sector efficiency target of 3% in 2018-19. I would be grateful if you could confirm Scottish Canals’ acceptance of the offer of funding on the terms set out above for 2018-19.

     

    Yours sincerely, Chris Wilcock - Head of Ports, Shipping, Freight and Canals Team

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.