Jump to content

archie57

Member
  • Posts

    692
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by archie57

  1. 50 minutes ago, magpie patrick said:

    Kennet and Avon locks are not standard (whatever "standard"might mean) they were built for boats 70 foot by 13 foot 8 - 13 foot 8 equals 4.2 metres.

     

    When I helped Luctor bring his boat down we didn't tru and share - she was a BCN station boat that had put on girth. Juno is a viking 23 and she sticks slightly if only one gate is opened. 

     

     

    It doesn't mean they have to be rebuilt to this width - must waste a lot of water when two narrowboats can't share...….

  2. 3 hours ago, Pluto said:

    I always find this preoccupation with 'exact'  colours strange. When looking at how to paint L&LC craft Kennet, I could not find two schemes the same, and talking to Sam Yates, who did the painting at Whitebirk boatyard, he assured me that the colours were knocked up each day, so that there were always variations in the colours used, though they were similar. We are talking about a time when skilled painters would mix their own paints, so there would always be variations in tone. Pantone colours are useful a as a guide, but will never be truly 'correct'. It does give people a good opportunity to complain though!

      and I dare say different paints would fade to different degrees.....

  3. I had a B-type out of a road roller similar to that pictured. Although it looked like a D-type, everything was a different size and I don't think anything was interchangeable with a D-type.

    • Greenie 1
  4. 2 hours ago, David Mack said:

    So what were Nuneaton and Barnes carrying that can't be seen in the photo below (and confused the caption writer) yet was heavy enough to load them down almost to the top guard?

    11134392-6821713-image-a-48_155290951351

    Steel bars  for Tyseley.  That's why, in the last picture , he's having  to use the notched end of the beam to force the sides apart so his wife can knock the beam into place.

  5. Thanks for this. We all know that navigation is at the bottom of the priority list for CRT, they seem incapable of maintaining water levels anywhere, clearly they don't appreciate how critical this is.  As regards dredging generally they seem to want to use any excuse not to do any, I dare say the budget for the PFC has been spent on the aqueduct railings at Marple (- as well as the locks!).                         I'm beginning to wonder why we bothered 50 years ago...…….

  6. The stern wasn't cut off, the counter round was removed and the sternpost extended upwards, two new plates fitted to raise the height of the swim, making a not-very-attractive stern end, it has to be said! Close inspection should reveal the boss for the stern tube still present. When  it's sister boat "Dory" was rebuilt, these plates were removed and the swim restored, and the stern tube hole used again!

  7. On ‎06‎/‎02‎/‎2019 at 18:39, alan_fincher said:

    Not sure if this has had an airing?

     

    https://canalrivertrust.org.uk/notice/13560/lock-11-marple-marple-flight-peak-forest-canal?fbclid=IwAR3YsnQzrz6EC5UBZlv52yHaDXWFKiV-96bTMlLKC-y28mcP0-4jQ1Q6PPs

     

     

    This is a bugger, because we were counting on using Marple Locks to get to the big HNBC event at Hebden Bridge.  Unfortunately that event is the same time as the revised date for this stoppage ending.

    I was thinking along those lines too, but I was wondering what sort of state the lower Peak Forest  ( don't  think it was ever very good for a deep draught boat!)  is in after the lengthy period of closure at Marple and the lack of through traffic - I wonder if billh of this forum could shed some light on this?

  8. When BTW started fitting Armstrongs and Petters, they experimented with gear change levers mounted on the footboard, the linkage dropping down and passing under the cabin floor. The Armstrong in the "Foxglove" was so fitted, and the PD2 in the "Bexhill" as I recall.

  9. I think Jimmy Hewitt is the figure with the white shirt standing on the back end (ie far end of engine room on RHS). it looks like his dad standing in the doorhole. I don't think it broke it's crank in his ownership. though. Steered it myself a few times while at Marple, slow going on those canals!

  10. 3 hours ago, alan_fincher said:


    Yes, at some point it received the BW "Space Ship" cabin, and as was typical the engine got relocated to the stern, (an HR from memory).

    That cabin was retained for the conversion, and the original line extended, so it is very boxy, (though no doubt spacious inside!)

    I don't think the counter is particularly unpleasing, although unless things have changed, it will be without cants, and probably have fairly formless bollards.

    It is what it is.  Without spending a fortune it is never going to have a GUCCCo style engine room with a back cabin behind.

    Rebottomed or overplated?  I don't know.

     

    47189877_10156766726917487_4612337569261

    This was only  rebuilt in the 1980s, pretty well unaltered until then, sold off fairly soon afterwards. Notable for having had the last Petter PD2 in Waterways ownership. 

  11. 22 minutes ago, X Alan W said:

    One of the funniest evenings(Ha Ha wise) was in the Pub with Ron (Hough ) RIP describing his part (not seen) in the Bargee tutoring Ronnie Barker& Harry  Corrbett & his description of Eric  Sykes"s antics not all waste of space /no knowledge left me laughing so much my sideb hurt for all the next day &later I towed his Ex butty "Bellarophne from Hillmorton /Norbury to replace horse tripboat "Iona"

    He does appear in the film, disguised, in long distance shots eg when leaving the lay by, Harry H. bumps the boats before it quickly cuts to Ron steering them round towards Brentford

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.