Jump to content

howardang

PatronDonate to Canal World
  • Posts

    2,823
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by howardang

  1. If you are serious about combining offshore cruising with inland waterways my suggestion would be, before you waste time, energy and mony on building a compromise vessel, is to get some experience of offshore conditions and requirements (and limitations. You mention certain requirements but you don't speak of any experience of conditions offshore, and the demands required of a boat and crew. Have you any knowledge of realistic conditions which you may find and level of experience required to be confident in venturing offshore. This sounds very much like a pipe-dream which will never come to reality. Much better to take the earlier advice to buy a narrow boat and spend some time exploring inland waterways and then see if your dream exists. If so, get some experience in offshore boats - possibly by taking a few RYA courses, before wasting money on what might be an unrealistic pipe-dream.

     

    Howard 

     

  2. I'll leave it to others more familiar with the RN to comment on the competence of present day RN  Officers. I know it's amusing to poke fun at the cause of the incident, but I have been round ships long enough to know that occasional mechanical failures do occur which are not the fault of those on the bridge and I will wait to see what the findings of the ongoing inquiry are before making any comments. I can sympathise with all those who were on the bridge at the time and for their sake I do hope it is found to be a mechanical failure.

     

    Howard

     

     

    • Greenie 4
  3. On 14/12/2023 at 12:38, Alway Swilby said:

    I don't think curtains were discussed once in the five years we had the share.

    I wouldn’t mind betting that pillows were. I have attended over 20 such AGM’s over the years and pillos and duvets wee always a main agenda ite taking up a significant portion of the time available. Even so, I think that  the annual get together/AGM is well worth attending if possible and gives you an opportunity to meet up with your fellow joint owners. I always found them very enjoyable.

     

    Howard

  4. 1 hour ago, StuartHannam said:

    Agreed, I am just making the effort to respond to anyone who has taken the trouble to comment. Thanks everyone for further information in case you read this later on. 

    for what it’s worth, I do wonder if you have  really thought about the actual small details of day to day living. For example, where does the toilet waste go? If not allowed directly overboard (which is the norm in most canal and river locations) how do you get rid of it ( tank?) and how frequently.? Ditto with day to day waste? Ditto, diesel, coal, fresh water replenishment? Groceries if you are on a swinging mooring? All the above can be difficult/impossible in bad weather, at a time when you might also be going stir crazy because you are stuck on board for the same reason. You don’t mention if you are used to boats but if not you really ought to try to get some practical knowledge before making such a serious move like the boat purchase you are suggesting. 


    Howard

     

     

     

     

     

  5. 3 hours ago, Dav and Pen said:

    This is not the same P&O as the ferry company this is a brand owned by Carnival along with Cunard and I would think the majority of the crew are not directly contracted to the company .

    I am saddened when I read about both P.O. and Cunard in this context and contrast the 2 present day organisations with the original  companies that I remember fondly from my earlier seagoing days. I was fortunate to have spent a number of years working as a deck officer with Cunard and can still remember the high standards which both Cunard and P&O maintained; two highly respected British companies now sad shadows of a previous existence.

    Howard

     

    • Greenie 1
  6. 11 minutes ago, David Mack said:

     

    I'm not sure the term 'narrow boat' was in widespread use in Rolt's time. Indeed it was his use of the term as the title for his book that popularised its use. 

    'Narrowboat' (as one word) is a more recent form.

    For general interest, my 1918 edition copy of Bradshaw's "Canals and Navigable Rivers of England and Wales",  written by Henry de Sallis,  has the following extract taken from a longer section describing different types of vessels both narrow and wide beam,  which I hope may be helpful:-

     

    quote:-

    "Principal types of vessels used in Inland Navigation. 

    a) non sailing vessels

    "Narrow" boats or "monkey" boats are by far the most numerous class of vessels engaged in inland navigation. They are from 70ft to 72ft long by from 6ft 9in. to 7ft 2in. beam, and draw from 8in. to 11in. of water when empty, loading afterwards about 1in. to 1 ton.

     

    The ordinary type of long-distance travelling narrow boat carries from 25 to 30 tons, and is built with rounded bilges. The narrow boats in use on the Severn and in a few other localities for short-distance traffic are built with square bilges, and carry up to 40 tons.This latter class of boat requires more power to haul, as it offers more resistance to the water, and also has the disadvantage of not being able to "carry a top", as the boatmen say, that is they become top heavy in loading sooner than a boat with rounded bilges.

     

    A modification of the narrow boat is found in Yorkshire, where is a type of short boat about 58ft. long by 7ft. beam, made for the purpose of passing the short locks of the Huddersfield Broad Canal and Calder and Hebble  Navigation and the narrow locks of the Huddersfield Narrow Canal. Another small type of narrow boat is found on the Shropshire Union Canals, being made to pass the small locks between Wappenshall junction and Trench; these boats measure 70ft. long by 6ft 2ins. wide, and draw, when empty, about 12.5 in., and when loaded with 17.5 tons, about 2ft. 8.5ins.  ..."

     

     

    Howard

  7. 20 minutes ago, haggis said:

    Thank you, Martin. It is a bit of as mindfield!. I also found a web site disability Scotland and have pointed the chairman in that direction as sometimes there is specific legislation relating to Scotland. I will also point her in the direction of the UK site. 

    Thanks again, Haggis

    Have a look at the MCA small passenger boat code link below which covers most aspects of such vessels.

     

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5ffd6917d3bf7f65d4220a58/Inland_Waters_Small_Passenger_Boat_Code_COP13.pdf

     

    Howard

    • Greenie 1
  8. 10 hours ago, MartynG said:

     

    Maybe folks who detest bow thrusters so passionately should consider whether their boat really needs an engine and should change to the horse being the  original means of moving boats on a canal.

    And what about that new fangled electric light stuff? Oil lamps are the way to go, and as for hot water and central heating? Work of the devil I say!

     

    Howard

  9. On 02/11/2023 at 12:09, davem399 said:

    If I remember correctly, Hexagon narrowboats were/are built in Poland.  Before they went bust, Ownerships had some Polish built narrowboats, possibly by Hexagon?

    Hexagon in Poland built a number of boats  which were shared ownership boats in the Ownerships fleet. Ther boats were mainly built in Poland and then brought to England to be fitted with engine etc.  My last boat was one of them with Hydraulic drive and Bow/stern thrust, all powered by a Nanni engine. The boats were very well equipped and many are still around. Our boat was sold a couple of years ago and I am not sure what her new name is but the original name was Winthorpe. The boat very well equipped and well looked and  when Ownerships ceased trading in 2008 the boat was managed by the owners. What is the name of the boat you are considering? 

     

    Howard

  10. Be cautious of adding extra weight especially to the roof. You could seriously compromise the reserve of stability without thinking of this issue and you may find that you may have to add weight i.e ballast low down to compensate, which could then increase your draught.  Discuss it with the boatyard before proceeding.

     

    Howard

     

     

  11. 1 minute ago, Crewcut said:

    Echo the above, my mate who recently retired & bought one had never narrowboated before & found the helmsman's course very useful but for you a diesel engine maintenance course would be far more useful if you're not au fait with them (and assuming your boat's not going to be electric 😁). Instructors vary a lot though so look for a recommendation rather than booking at random. Good luck with it all...👍

    I agree about the engine maintenance course. As far as the Helmsman's course,  the insurance companies I have dealt with in previous years have never requested one but rather (similar Haggis above) have asked that at least one crewmember has sufficient experience to manage the boat safely. I am sure that IWHC  it is better than nothing for a complete beginner and you will certainly learn some basics, but for anyone who has been boating for a number of years I think  they have limited value. Certainly in a one or two day course there is a limit to what can be taught  and I suspect from what I have seen in practise  that courses can vary in standard from provider to provider. If a newcomer does decide going down that route fair enough but I would only say that it is not a certificate of competency and it marks the beginning of a learning experience rather than the culmination. 🙂  

     

    Howard

  12. 43 minutes ago, Mike Hurley said:

    Cellulose went of fashion in early 80s. its all water based acrylic polyurethane enamel now, better for the environment apparently.

    Nothing to say about the paint but this does remind me of something in the 1970's when there was a lot of offshore work taking place. The story goes that someone was offered some surplus cement which originally destined for an offshore platform. Apparently he acquired it at a very cheap rate and he  used it on his house driveway. Unfortunately, the seller neglected to tell him that it was  cement which only sets when underwater! I don't suppose that he made that mistake again.🤥

     

    Howard

    • Haha 1
  13. 1 hour ago, Tracy D'arth said:

    It still does not read correctly. there is an "on" missing. If I have to do this every time I am gone from the forum.

    Interesting that on a site which is getting increasingly  rule bound the additional rule about AI has not been checked and therefore does not actually appear to make sense!

     

    more proof reading I suggest.

    Howard

     

    • Greenie 1
  14. Thanks for posting these photos which, as you say, show Manchester Docks being used for what they  were meant for. What a crying shame that they are not used in the same  way these days. Many of the ships shown are familiar to me and with  some I shared the same trading routes, although my UK turn around port was mainly Liverpool with only occasional trips as far up the ship canal as part as Ellesmere Port with Aluminium from Canada. 

     

    Howard

    • Greenie 1
  15. 3 hours ago, ditchcrawler said:

    Most hires are told or shown how to work a lock or steer the boat

    That very true but I had still never worked or been through one before

     

    Many first time hirers are in exactly that situation. They have never been in a lock never mind working through one. Once you have been told or been shown how to do one by either looking at the boaters manual or seeing it demonstrated or even visiting a lock and watching what the boaters do, you will soon get the hang of how to manage. Take it reasonably slowly at first and by the end of a couple of days you will be working locks like a pro!  It honestly isn't rocket science as many first timers each year can testify.  

     

    Howard

  16. 17 hours ago, bluelapsing said:

    Hi all,

     

    I've (finally) completed the purchase of my first boat! Thanks to many of the threads on this forum I've got the peace of mind that everything is as satisfactory as it could realistically be at this stage, and at a fair price thanks to one of the surveyors regularly recommended here.

     

    So as not to bombard you with a million and one questions at once, I'm curious if it would be possible and advisable for a few people with no boating experience to attempt to move a 35ft NB from Nantwich to Nottingham without a Helmsman's course? The person at the marina isn't available in time but I might be able to do one locally/elsewhere - or would it be safer to pay someone to move the boat for me?

     

    Any advice much appreciated!

     

    TIA

    I would look at this way. As long as the boat is in reasonable condition mechanically and you are happy that it is capable of doing the trip, pretend that you have decided to have a holiday on the waterways and treat the trip as a learning experience, and enjoy it as such. Every year many people hire boats for a week or longer, never having had any boating experience beforehand, and the largest majority have a totally  enjoyable experience. Look on line for a copy of The Boaters Handbook, free from CRT on their web site, which is full of tips and advice aimed at newcomers like you, and if you come across something in the booklet you are confused about, ask this forum and someone will be able to help.

     

    Good luck and just remember that all boaters have gone through the same concerns and have gone on to enjoy their waterway experience with no issues.

     

    Howard

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Greenie 3
  17. This may be of interest:

     

    My 1918 copy of "Bradshaw's Canals and Navigable Rivers of England and Wales" by De Salis has the following description in the section Principal types of Vessels used in Inland Navigation -  "Non sailing vessels.  "Narrow Boats"  or "Monkey Boats" are by far the most class of vessels engaged in inland navigation. The are from 70ft to 72ft long by from 6ft. 9in. to 7ft. 2in. and draw from 8in. to 11 in. of water when empty, loading afterwards about 1in. to 1 ton." 

    There is no differentiation between the two terms but shows that the term seems to have been in common and frequent  use quite early in Canal History.

     

    Howard

     

     

     

     

  18. 1 hour ago, Ken X said:

    My guess for the second one is the Lynmouth Lifeboat, Louisa being pulled through Lynmouth.  I have seen a similar photo dated 1903 in a different part of Lynmouth.

    I read somewhere that this maybe Port Isaac. Maybe someone can confirm.

     

    For interest google Historic overland Lifeboat Launch for an epic launch of the Whitby Pulling lifeboat at Robin-Hoods Bay after a huge effort to haul it some miles overland when it was impossible to launch at Whitby because of heavy weather.

     

    Howard

  19. 10 minutes ago, wandering said:

    Thanks, buddy. Yeah, I managed to negotiate the price down when I bought her from the broker by about 7 grand. Plus I'd added things to enhance its value. But I also saw how much the previous owners bought it for and it was much, much less than I paid (by another 7 or so grand). It's so subjective. I sort of wish I insured it for a bit more now but lesson learned. It is a great little 40ft home that I got off a retired couple who merely had to hang up their windlasses due to age. They maintained it really well. I don't really have the skills or strength to fix it myself as I'm not good at that sort of thing but having spoken with Red Hill Marina, they said they have people who can help me bring it back to life and there's a place to store it and all that jazz which is promising. If they can give me a good price to restore the interiors then I'd be happy to buy the boat back if there is a total loss. I'll know in a few days hopefully once the independent surveyor forms his opinion. Pray for me! 

     

     

    It might be worth pointing out that a total loss is when a vessel is actually lost. I think what people are mentioning about total loss is actually what is called ‘Constructive total loss’ where a vessel is recovered but repairs and rebuilding etc. to the vessel will cost more than the insured value. That is a situation well understood in the marine industry. 
     

    it doesn’t help your unfortunate situation but it helps to understand the difference between CL and CTL.

     

    Howard

    • Greenie 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.