antarmike
-
Posts
275 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Posts posted by antarmike
-
-
Would that be M. E. Old Boat-surveyor then ?
Here are the two Kestrals (sic.) both taken in the mid 1970's.The tug is at Hawkesbury Jcn, ....
There does seem to be some confusion on BWB's part since the photo above is of a boat named Kestral not Kestrel. The sign writer, and I use that term loosely, does not seem to be working from any written record or surely the spelling would be correct.
-
The advert looked to me like something from the 1950s or earlier. I presumed it was from some foreign country as it does not actually say what the currency is.
You are right about Liverpool though! No, seriously, it is a great place (but not to try teaching).
CB
The catalogue page I posted says Buck and Hickman, a very famous British engineering supplier with (then) depots in London Glasgow Birmingham Manchester Bristol and Watford. Their only depot in a foreign country in 1971/72 was Dublin, (run by a separate company Messrs Booth, Buck and Hickman Ltd.)
My original post had this under the illustration
Quote "A bargain at £1.17 in their 1971/72 catalogue". (I would have thought that covered all bases?)
Buck and Hickman sell/ sold their own tools under the name "Roebuck". Their older "Roebuck" tool are now collectors items"
Buck and Hickman now have 28 Depots throughout the U.K.
-
mike, you forget Liverpool was slightly behind, went metric in 73, discovered other music in 75 , everyone elses alloy wheels in 88, and shell suits in 91 and hasn't discovered any fashion trend since.
and the Queen's English never made it there either.
-
No such thing as 94p in those days. It would have been £-s-d.
CB
The page is from the 1971/72 catalogue of Buck and Hickman and if you look at it you can clearly see it is in Pounds and New Pence.
Dual pricing for some items was in place in 1970, high denomination Decimal postage stamps were issued in 17th June 1970. British Railways and London Transport went decimal the day before the rest of the country on the 14th February 1971 but all other bus companies did not go metric until Sunday 21st February. Old money could be offered in payment after 15th February, but none was given out in change. On 31 August 1971, the Old penny and the Old threepence had become very rare and the last were officially withdrawn from circulation, ending the transition period. In reality there were several D Days. However the price of the large bucket in this catalogue was 94 New Pence.
-
hot tar for felt roofing .bob
Amazing how there is no tar staining inside though isn't it!
If you look at my catalogue page I posted you will see to the right of the "Boiler Filler" what a hot tar bucket looks like and that is nothing like this!
(The tar will cool and solidify in the narrow spout, that is why a Tar Bucket has an open jug like form, Bitumen is put into the bucket in solid blocks, that is why a tar bucket has a completely open top. This is half covered, how can you put big lumps of solid material inside this to melt?)
-
Still being sold in the early seventies (although slightly different design in the tipping handle design), by Buck and Hickman as "Boiler Fillers" Steam engines had a conveniently placed 2" B.S.P. plug that could be removed to pour water into a drained down boiler. As steam traction came to an end it appears the same useful Galvanised filling can was still available under the old name whilst now being used to fill internal combustion engine radiators.
A bargain at £1.17 in their 1971/72 catalogue
There were two LTE's the first LTE operated between 1948-1962 when On 1 January 1948, under the provisions of the Transport Act 1947 the London Passenger Transport Board was nationalised and renamed the London Transport Executive.
I note that from 1948 this LTE started work on the electrification of those parts of the underground network that were still steam operated as soon as they came into existence.
On the Central line steam locomotives were still operating between Greenford and West Ruislip in the west and between Leytonstone and Ongar in the east. Electrification to West Ruislip was completed in 1948, leading to the start of passenger trains which did not require locomotive changes on 21 November of that year. On the same day electrification round the "Fairlop loop" in the east was completed. And from 25 September 1949 electric tube trains were in operation between Loughton and Epping. This left a steam shuttle service operating between Epping and Ongar which was not electrified until 18 November 1957. Steam locomotives were fully withdrawn from the Underground network on 9 September 1961. I suppose it is just conceivable that the LTE commissioned new Boiler Fillers with their initials on even though they were working hard to replace steam.
This seems unlikely, I reckon this is for filling radiators. (Farmer might fill a traction engine with a can, but surely a steam shed would have hoses!)
If radiator filling is the use of this can then the second LTE, again standing for The 'London Transport Executive , but this time the title of the arm of the Greater London Council that ran public transport in London between 1970 and 1984, was a likely candidate for buying these to top up bus radiators. The second LTE was a totally separate organisation to the first.
-
A friend of mine had one of those. He said it was an oil filling can for use on the buses (he used to work as a London bus driver). Can't remember his having any lettering either.
Water not oil, There was one similar always under the water tap at London Transport's/ London Country's Garage in Tring, I often saw drivers topping up from it.
The Tap was right beside the road, in front of the office. The can may be seen under the tap which is partially hidden behind the balding gent, the can being just to his right. He is actually standing on the pavement of Western Road. Though it was the unpressurised AEC Regent III's resting in the garage that where more likely to need topping up than this pressurised AEC Merlin/Strachan XMB15. I am surprised the can was never stolen.
-
I can't easily find other pictures anything like as old.
This is much more recent, but unfortunately date is given as a wide 1955 - 1969 range.
However, although I think it must be that side of the canal, I can't quite work out why in this picture the seems to be canal width for three 14 foot barges without obstructing the bridge or lock, but in the picture of the butties, there seems to only be one barge moored behind. I suppose it is possible that there is a further barge behind that one that is obscured?
EDIT:
Actually I'm not at all convinced they are full with barges in that picture now.....
Look like dredging boats to me, a lot of those were between 10 and 12 foot wide, are we sure these are 14 footers?
-
Interesting to see how the "posts" for the windlass winch attach to the knees. I am sure I would have been into the fore end of Perseverence and Speedweel but I don't remember this detail
-
Thought you might like this Wey Barge Reliance
-
Stern of the Barge ahead of the narrow boat looks more like Tuba/ Gwendoline, which has a smaller Transom than the William Stevens Barges I knew (Perseverance and Speedwell) When I knew Gwendoline/ Tuba she had lost a windlass (If she ever had one). Fleet/ Lightning 2 had a windlass, but she had a sternpost rather than a transom stern, When I knew her she had no foredeck, rather an open Cockpit. (In my opinion she was once decked and this has been lost in the conversion process.) What is clear was, as with Narrow boat design, there was a lot of variation in the designs of the Wey barges.
Well Fleet still had the two posts between which her winch /windlass would have fitted. Looking again no fore deck might be as she was built after all, but then again where would the anchore lay and where would the anchor chain be stored?.
I am sorry I can't be rsed to sort out these half frame negatives so that you don't get the odd upside down shot!
-
Wey barge passing under "High Bridge" on Tring Summit, My Copyright
Detail of Windlass, Anchor and chain
-
Height of the coping stones/ top of the Dock wall/ Quayside suggests Tidal. or on a river prone to flooding, dunno
River Wey Barge/ Barges??
-
Probably because that is how they spell the name of the mountain in Argyll that it is almost certainly named after.
The boat was around in my time and I remember it as as Ben Cruachen.
-
Off topic I know but more of the horses mentioned..
All images copyright Mike Fincher
-
This horse is "Patience" She was owned by Mike Baldey, who ran the trip boat and she was my favourite to work with. He also had "Providence" and "Prudence" His partner Eve Bristowe owned a heavy Hunter called "Selby" who would pull the boat on occasions . Selby was a bit light to work the boat, was grumpy, and idle. All the Horses where kept in a field beside the G.U, accessed from a roadway, track that started at New Road Northchurch, and ran past Northchurch lock and forked away from the towpath. (the field now lost under housing around the new streets of Emerton Garth and Emerton Close, Brakynbury etc) This made life hard when we horse boated between Cowroast and Berko, since we had to take one horse along the towpath, with the other horses the side of the hedge from the towpath. On one memorable occasion going south along the "Long Pound" approaching Northchurch lock, I was walking with but behind the horse when she decided she was going back to her field rather than finish the trip, and ran off down the bank to the field gate, taking me with her with my arms caught under the horse line, dragging me backwards through the hedge and nettles and the boat into the piling. The line pulled tight and broke with me still caught under my arms.....all good fun.
Mike Baldey rented a stable in Station Road Berkhamsted (which I think is now known as The Coach House and looks totally different to the way I recall it, but that is progress) , accessible up a little path from the tow-path just behind "The Crystal Palace". He would harness the horses here, and often if a boozy trip finished late at night, the Horse would remain here until we took it back to Northchurch the next day. Shoeing was normally done here.
I believe "Prudence" was sold to day trip on The Kennet and Avon. I know it was one of the Bay horses (Might just have been "Providence") we took down down there. We worked the horse on its first K and A trip, but I never went back to re-visit.
On longer trips we provided a nose bag for feed. A great source of friction between the horsebarge and Sam Horne at Berko locks was the fact that Patience was partial to his famous roses and would graze the flowers whenever she got the chance.
Nose bag (right) lies on fore end of a wey barge
Patience With Ginny Harris
Patience
Patience Mike Baldey and Eve Bristowe mind their Baby, Ann Rayner and Pete Fincher
Selby
Selby Mike Baldey & Ginny Harris
Providence Eve Bristowe John Dakin (and Nicholas Hill of course)
Providence
Selby foreground Patience behind. In their Northchurch field
Providence, same location.
Providence being a proud mum...
Copyright Mike Fincher all photographs. (Can't get used to this Forums clock being an hour out and it calling Today Tomorrow when it is still 50 minutes to go till midnight!)
-
Though purely a guess, the clicky I posted earlier showed Ben boats loaded with Timber for James Davies Timber and shows the location Hayes Bridge Wharf for them, Davies also had wharfs at Otter Dock (Cowley/Uxbridge) and Yeading Dock and it would seem strange if these also were not serviced by wide boats.
-
I learnt to fell trees practising on Dead Elms, nearly killed Sam Horne with one I felled......At Bottom Side lock if I remember.
-
There are a few letters about trees alongside canals in the Gentleman's Magazine:
Dec 1792, pp1080-1
Letter from Dendrophilus re planting trees alongside canals to reduce water loss.
March 1793, pp217-8
Further letter from Dendrophilus re correspondence over his tree idea. Other letters April 1793, pp301-2, Aug 1793, p715, Sept 1793, pp800-1, Oct 1793, pp907 (with good quote on boatmen stealing from farmers fields)
The argument centred over whether the shade provided by the trees made it a better place for boatmen to work and reduced evaporation, compared to the damage they do to the canal structure and the loss of water caused by the trees themselves. Bear in mind that natural drainage provides a significant supply of water to canals, and trees will affect this. The answer seems to have been that trees were worth planting in France, particularly in the sunnier south, but that the damage they caused made them less benficial to British canals.
Not the same tree I know but a large mature Oak, at the height of summer, takes water at a rate of 600 gallons per day from the ground and transpires it through its leaves (also quoted is 40,000 gallons per year per Oak tree but transpiration only occurs when in leaf, so there is a long dormant period with no transpiration at all), the actual rate depending on the wind, temperature etc. 600 gallons has to be the absolute maximum. 90 (ish)Oak trees planted on a bank and getting their water from the canal could equate roughly to one lock full of water wasted per day sucked out of the cut, I wonder if the tree planting for shade theory took this into account? Other sources say a Maple shifts 40 gallons per hour, the average figure quoted for a non specific tree is around 160 - 250 gallons per day.
-
Looks like typical park land. The trees are ornamental, and protected from grazing. (a deer park? the Old deer park Richmond? Port meadow Oxford? Mill Meadows? Dropmore Park?) You would not have trees like this in open farm land, used purely for grazing cattle. There appears to be a walker or group of walkers on the edge of the bank ( by the fence) suggesting this is some place with public access or where the public may stroll. There is a even a Lombardy Poplar! where is there such parkland? I can't think of such a place on the Soar today?
-
That person isn't pushing off with a boat hook, It is far too big a cross section to be a shaft. must be 6 or 8 inches across. And would you shaft from on top of the load, and some way back from the bow? wouldn't you stand on the foredeck and shaft from there? There are top planks at the back of the hold, but not where the "mast" is. The side sheets are not tied up where the "mast" is either. Is this to make room for a sail? There appears to be two guy lines or rigging (stays) going to the top of the mast. There seems to be a horizontal bar or something running from a few feet up the high mast towards the Normal mast on the other boat (a boom?), Is the person in front of the mast handling part of the rigging of a sail? Again maybe a boom.
-
I spy with my little eye something beginning with L.P.
-
Blimey! It's 'Gardener's Question Time' . . .
If there are clues you have got to use them....
-
Sorry been a bad day, dead central heating, cold, off work waiting for the "man who does" to turn up late without the parts he needs, wait for him as he goes to Lincoln to get the bits "only be an hour" and continue waiting till he gets back 2 1/2 hours. and then the bill.I read it but I must be honest, I'm really not that bothered where or when the photo was taken.
I joined in the discussion making a light hearted response to something you posted and am not too interested in getting dragged into a deep debate about something which, at the end of the day, will remain just a theory.
My personal theory is that it is a watercourse, probably natural, that is running through some rich bod's grounds (hence the ornamental trees) and he has probably had a flat packhorse bridge replaced with something that enables him to navigate without banging his bonce.
I know we will never know, didn't mean to be short with you.
primer for a new watercan
in History & Heritage
Posted
Granville Galvanised Etching Primer 1 Litre should be about £8.00