Hello Alan de Enfield
In answer to your first question, I am the Joel of the blog . Can I presume you are Alan of the Canal ? May I call you Canalan?
I'm not sure what "ethics" you were referring to. Please clarify and I'll endeavour to elaborate. As for justifying /explaining the extract from my "scandalous" blog post that you quoted, doesn't the rest of that blog post do that already?
I agree that enforcement should makes cruising for all of us easier. However, when CRT sell off vast sections of visitor moorings in heavily populated areas for the winter - at the same, remember, as stoppages and potentially adverse weather conditions are at their peak - the cumulative effect is that the system slows down dramatically . Some boaters then find it harder to move; others simply resist doing so. The consequence, however, is that a larger number of continuous cruisers within that geographical area who are usually happy complying with the t & c's of their cruising license also slow down for fear that if they do move from one spot they will struggle to find another. I'm currently in London and usually double moor (not that I mind doing so). It's unrealistic to expect to be here and not double (or triple) moored much of the time.
Thanks for commenting Alan. Much appreciated
Cereal Tiller ! What a great username. It's a huge shame you feel you don't want to bring your boat into the capital anymore.
I enjoy being here. Actually I enjoy wherever I am if I'm honest.
Double mooring in london i-for me - is just another boating experience . It has it's pros and cons.
I find the vast majority of boaters here very considerate , irrespective of whether they are using their boat as cheap housing or not.
I wasn't boating 10 years ago - so can't compare with how it was then
Yes , I agree, it's very busy here and of course enforcement is critical . My point is that the motives driving that enforcement may not be what they appear to be and this needs to be put into order