Jump to content

My third SmartGauge...


MtB

Featured Posts

On 05/07/2018 at 12:26, Iain_S said:

If you mean linearly with time, then I have to say neither of mine do. As expected, displayed  S.O.C. rises fairly quickly at the beginning, and then slows right down after 90% or so.

When I spent some time recording and plotting the SG reading vs the AH counter reading against time, the former was a straight line. However that might have been the latter portion of charging, say 80% to 100%. I’ll see if I still have the graph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just picking up on this topic having fitted a Smartgauge this morning, Obtained from Cactus, it works fine but wouldn’t enter the set up menu until I’d done a Factory Reset. It made me wonder whether it was a returned unit? It seemed to have been supplied with the Menu Lock active.

The only issue is that the letter T doesn’t display correctly. Anyone else noticed this?

Here’s my query:

The manual makes a lot of the learning process during the first few cycles. Is this learning retained if the power is cut? I notice that the SOC is lost after a power cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Peter Thornton said:

Just picking up on this topic having fitted a Smartgauge this morning, Obtained from Cactus, it works fine but wouldn’t enter the set up menu until I’d done a Factory Reset. It made me wonder whether it was a returned unit? It seemed to have been supplied with the Menu Lock active.

The only issue is that the letter T doesn’t display correctly. Anyone else noticed this?

Here’s my query:

The manual makes a lot of the learning process during the first few cycles. Is this learning retained if the power is cut? I notice that the SOC is lost after a power cut.

My manual p7 and p8 suggest not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Peter Thornton said:

 Is this learning retained if the power is cut?

No. But as it’s connected directly to the battery terminals the only time that’s likely to be an issue is if you replaced or rewired the bank. 

Edited by WotEver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WotEver said:

No. But as it’s connected directly to the battery terminals the only time that’s likely to be an issue is if you replaced or rewired the bank. 

Are you sure? All settings are retained in NVRAM and as far as I’m aware, this includes the learnt data. This is why you have to carry out a factory reset if you move it to a different battery bank.

 

As to the original question, it does seem odd that menu lock was activated. I’d be a bit suspicious. Try to check the displayed battery voltage against a known good meter. As to the t, do you mean a segment that you think should be illuminated, isn't? The 7 segment displays are primarily designed to display numbers. They can make a stab at some letters but not ideal. I would expect it to be able to display a lower case t reasonably well though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, WotEver said:

No. But as it’s connected directly to the battery terminals the only time that’s likely to be an issue is if you replaced or rewired the bank. 

Or disconnect and remove them every couple of months to check the levels and SG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nicknorman said:

All settings are retained in NVRAM and as far as I’m aware, this includes the learnt data.

Most settings are retained but not all. Specifically regarding SoC the manual states

following reapplication of power SmartGauge will continue to operate as previously so

given time it will catch up with the charge status of the batteries.

So SmartGauge will remember the characteristics of your bank but will still take a few cycles to accurately display SoC which to my mind amounts to much the same as ‘forgetting what it’s learnt’. 

 

The full description of repowering following power loss is:

If Primary alarms were set to operate on low charge status, then the alarm will have been disabled. Low or high voltage alarms will remain active. All the set points such as voltage or status activate and deactivate levels, low status timer etc will remain as they were, but an actual low status alarm will be switched off. Secondary alarms will remain as they were set prior to the power failure.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, nicknorman said:

it does seem odd that menu lock was activated. I’d be a bit suspicious. Try to check the displayed battery voltage against a known good meter.

Agreed. Simply measure across the battery posts (the same place SG is connected) and see if the voltage readings are identical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, WotEver said:

Most settings are retained but not all. Specifically regarding SoC the manual states

So SmartGauge will remember the characteristics of your bank but will still take a few cycles to accurately display SoC which to my mind amounts to much the same as ‘forgetting what it’s learnt’. 

 

The full description of repowering following power loss is:

 

I think you are misinterpreting slightly. Yes the actual SoC is lost, but not the learnt parameters that are used to optimise the algorithm. I presume the decision not to “remember” the SoC was a deliberate one in case the battery SoC changed significant whilst it was disconnected (eg very flat batteries taken off for charge).

 

The “given time” bit refers to the need for the SG to re-synchronise with the actual SoC. Note that it says “given time” not “given cycles”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sea Dog said:

Crikey, this seems like a lot of faffing around for something you don't trust anyway!

???

 

What faffing? And who doesn’t trust it?

Just now, nicknorman said:

I think you are misinterpreting slightly. Yes the actual SoC is lost, but not the learnt parameters that are used to optimise the algorithm. I presume the decision not to “remember” the SoC was a deliberate one in case the battery SoC changed significant whilst it was disconnected (eg very flat batteries taken off for charge).

 

The “given time” bit refers to the need for the SG to re-synchronise with the actual SoC. Note that it says “given time” not “given cycles”.

You’re quite possibly (probably?) correct. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sea Dog said:

Crikey, this seems like a lot of faffing around for something you don't trust anyway!

Our boat is a share boat and our owners fall into two camps: 

 

1. Owners who are intensely interested in batteries and spend a lot of time looking at numbers and voltages. 

2. Owners who would rather look at the view, don’t want to think about batteries on their holidays and just want to know when the engine needs running or they need to turn some lights off.

 

I’ve come to the conclusion that the Smartgauge is a great aid for the second group. 

 

It’s the first group (which includes me) who ask all the complicated questions and who would actually probably be better served by an Amp Hour counter.

 

26 minutes ago, nicknorman said:

I think you are misinterpreting slightly. Yes the actual SoC is lost, but not the learnt parameters that are used to optimise the algorithm. I presume the decision not to “remember” the SoC was a deliberate one in case the battery SoC changed significant whilst it was disconnected (eg very flat batteries taken off for charge).

 

The “given time” bit refers to the need for the SG to re-synchronise with the actual SoC. Note that it says “given time” not “given cycles”.

That’s more or less the conclusion I came to, but I wondered if anyone had evidence other than reading the manual?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, WotEver said:

What faffing? And who doesn’t trust it?

Well, checking the calibration is a faff and how can you trust it unless you know is right?  Pondering where you are with it because no-one really knows how it works is a nuisance, if not a faff. MtB has 3 he doesn't trust. Others agree.  Others don't. The post above points that out too. 

 

I don't have a dog in the fight though, as I went t'other way on battery monitoring. The above is one reason why I made that choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sea Dog said:

Well, checking the calibration is a faff and how can you trust it unless you know is right?  Pondering where you are with it because no-one really knows how it works is a nuisance, if not a faff. MtB has 3 he doesn't trust. Others agree.  Others don't. The post above points that out too. 

 

I don't have a dog in the fight though, as I went t'other way on battery monitoring. The above is one reason why I made that choice.

I don’t think the fitting and operation is a “faff”, it’s just that it looks as if there were some faulty units around. Mine reads exactly the same as a good quality meter I have and reads 12.8 on a fully charged bank, which suggests that all is well.

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.