Jump to content

Google Earth Canal & River Map. (Canalmaponline)


Chris Lowe

Featured Posts

11 hours ago, buccaneer66 said:

Normal feedback process is via the contact us button on the website, but I'm making notes of comments here as well.

Kathryn

Do you have a map showing the full extent of the tramway, what i have i got from the Blisworth village website.

The other tramway I'm trying to trace in that area is the Gayton to northampton tramway.

Chris

 

This is the best I can do for you.  It’s on the South Northants District Council website - I hope this reproduces properly. - It's page 2 that's interesting. 

Appendix 1.pdf

There's a bit that goes out towards Gayton on page 4 but that only goes as far as Candle Bridge on the outskirts of Blisworth - I have a contact whom I'll talk to about the tramway down into Northampton - he's not in the best of health so it may take a little time.

Edited by Leo No2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/11/2017 at 21:15, buccaneer66 said:

Thanks Kathryn 

It looks like it pretty much follows what became the tow path

Thank you so much for updating the map.  Technically it doesn't follow the towpath as the current permissive towpath crosses the canal at Lock 14 (Stoke Bruerne Top) and follows the western side of the Stoke Bruerne flight until it gets to Lock 20 (Bottom Lock) but you can walk down the eastern side easily enough.  It may well have followed the line of the plateway railway originally but the access under the A508 bridge on the eastern side is very narrow and low now - maybe since the bridge was build in, I understand, the 1930s. The A508 bridge can be used as a turnover bridge to get you onto the western side of the canal without the need to cross the (now very busy) A508.  The A508 was a turnpike road and I imagine the plateway may well have crossed it in the early days - David Blagrove was always my source of 'I think/I imagine' but sadly no longer with us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's interesting. Lock 20 is the bottom lock in the flight, and of course the old Northampton Road would not have the bridge that is there today, and the locks would have been narrow ones. The tramway would have been built before the flight had been finished and accommodated transhipment of goods from the bottom of the flight. Logical really, though I do wonder why the word "probable" has been included. It would have also run on the 'offside' for the length from beside the top lock to the bottom.

Edited by Derek R.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Derek R. said:

That's interesting. Lock 20 is the bottom lock in the flight, and of course the old Northampton Road would not have the bridge that is there today, and the locks would have been narrow ones. The tramway would have been built before the flight had been finished and accommodated transhipment of goods from the bottom of the flight. Logical really, though I do wonder why the word "probable" has been included.

Please correct me if I am wrong but I was under the impression the Grand Junction Canal had double locks from its inception.

From David Blagroves At the Heart of the Waterways:

Building began at Braunston, Brentford and Uxbridge during May 1739.......

Starting from the junction with the Oxford Canal, after about a third of a mile, the canal began to ascend the valley by means of six locks, each one being double the width of an Oxford Canal lock.

Edited by Ray T
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's probably correct when originally built (I haven't checked my Faulkners) but looking at the OS 6" for 1892 - 1905 maps show weirs where a second lock may have been, though some show none.

http://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=17&lat=52.1389&lon=-0.9130&layers=168&b=1

On a second look, They may well have been wide locks from inception. I'm probably thinking of the widening in the thirties further North. Must read up some more.

 

Ian and Ray are correct of course - designed to be 14' 6" in width with double locks.

Edited by Derek R.
Correcting an assumption
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, IanM said:

The Stoke Bruerne flight was definitely twin wide locks during some point in its life hence the double bridge (and two lock chambers for that matter) at the top lock.

32949537124_8e51103e27_c.jpgStoke Bruerne Village At War 2016 by Ian, on Flickr

And dont forget they had that old weighing machine in the disused top lock. Lots of the other double bridges are still there 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is that for the brief period the locks at Stoke Bruerne were duplicated, each of the pair was a broad lock capable of holding 2 narrow boats.

This differs from what was done in a similar time-frame for the locks at Marsworth, and north to the Stoke Hammond area, where it is recorded, (and the evidence still firmly exists), that the duplicated locks were only single ones, (the originals of course always having been double).

The histories record that these arrangements didn't last long, (from memory only about 10 years in each case, I think - the closures more or less linked to the date the London to Birmingham railway opened, and by which date traffics were already in decline).

I seem to recall that the surviving top lock at Stoke Bruerne is not the original but the duplicate, and that the original lock is the now dry one with the boat hulk dumped in it.  That would explain the strange alignment going uphill into that lock.  (I may be remembering wrong though!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have details of the number of locks, but I did find this drawing in the archives in Vienna, one of a series done by Sebastien von Maillard when he visited English canals in 1795. I have just translated his book on canal building, where he advocates narrow canals and which I hope to get published next year. He built the Wienner Neustadt Canal around 1800 which is, in effect, and English narrow canal. In the archive there are also drawings of Coventry Canal narrow boats showing their construction in detail, so probably the earliest drawings of narrow boats surviving. On the lock drawing, notice that the hollow quoins are made from wood.

GJC lock 1795.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ray T said:

Spoke to Mike H today and he said as far as he is aware the Stoke Bruerne flight was only ever one set of double locks. He suggested the disused lock at the top of the flight was a dry dock. 

They were definitely doubled at some point.

You can even see the coping stones and slight depression in the ground where the duplicate lock was at the 2nd lock down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this thread is getting confused between two concepts

1) narrow (7') and wide (14') locks

2) single and double locks - ie whether there was one lock at a given location or two, side by side. 

Surely all the Grand Junction was built with  wide locks, with the exception of the Northampton and Aylesbury arms which are narrow.

And there were some locations eg Stoke Hammond, other places where dual arch bridges  were built, where there may have been double locks?

Edited by Scholar Gypsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IanM said:

They were definitely doubled at some point.

You can even see the coping stones and slight depression in the ground where the duplicate lock was at the 2nd lock down.  

I don't know but a suggestion, from David Blagrove's Two Centuries of service?

plateway.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.