Jump to content

Newt Relocation Licence Refused - Montgomery Canal


Featured Posts

Grant funding has been obtained to restore the next 50m stretch beyond Pryce’s Bridge by volunteers of the Shropshire Union Canal Society, supported by the Canal & River Trust (CRT).

 

The CRT has been waiting several months for a decision from Natural England (NE) on a licence application to relocate newts from this section. NE has finally advised that it is intending to reject the application. -

 

Source :-

http://www.boatingbusiness.com/news101/industry-news/newts-delay-montgomery-restoration2#sthash.FLBJFHBl.dpuf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newt rustling anybody. Drive by newt relocation. HS2 brought to a halt by sudden influx of newts.

To be honest I think it's mad. Newts may be endangered but a relocation could give them a better chance of expanding their range.

 

has hs2 been abandoned then?......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grant funding has been obtained to restore the next 50m stretch beyond Pryce’s Bridge by volunteers of the Shropshire Union Canal Society, supported by the Canal & River Trust (CRT).

 

The CRT has been waiting several months for a decision from Natural England (NE) on a licence application to relocate newts from this section. NE has finally advised that it is intending to reject the application. -

 

Source :-

http://www.boatingbusiness.com/news101/industry-news/newts-delay-montgomery-restoration2#sthash.FLBJFHBl.dpuf

 

[Natural England] has asked CRT ... to revisit the application to provide more information on the proposals including details of newt compensation

 

The world has gone mad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My reading of the article linked above suggests things aren't as bleak as you all seem to assume. For the following reasons.

 

1. Asking them to revisit the application giving more details wouldn't be invited if they had made their mien up that there was no way things could be sorted out.

 

2. This "compensation" you are all getting so hot under the collar about is actually compensation habitat. so no money for the newts to invest but perhaps some changes in land management either along/near the canal or perhaps at the place they intend to relocate the newts to, That isn't made clear in the article,

 

The 130 days instead of 30 may be due to time taken working out some suggestions for how CRT should proceed to be able to get a license. Remember it is a news article and facts should never get in the way of a good story.

 

Why do so many people want to knock an organisation or person without looking at both sides and getting all the facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Why do so many people want to knock an organisation or person without looking at both sides and getting all the facts.

because there's newt worse than unlicenced continuously moored newts that have newt better to do than go newtwhere else.

Edited by matty40s
  • Greenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its important not to just screw over the country side and habits, but this does seem a bit misplaced.

authorities seem to be intent on screwing over the countryside, when the monty has long silted up they will build flats right over the sludge newts or not, its disgusting what they will AND WONT do to our countryside

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grant funding has been obtained to restore the next 50m stretch beyond Pryce’s Bridge by volunteers of the Shropshire Union Canal Society, supported by the Canal & River Trust (CRT).

 

The CRT has been waiting several months for a decision from Natural England (NE) on a licence application to relocate newts from this section. NE has finally advised that it is intending to reject the application. -

 

Source :-

http://www.boatingbusiness.com/news101/industry-news/newts-delay-montgomery-restoration2#sthash.FLBJFHBl.dpuf

I cant fully comprehend this topic,

 

However,if it were retitled NEWTS REFUSED VICTUALLERS LICENCE,.it would be more valid?

 

We all know their insatiable requirement for intoxication!

 

CT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some years ago, when we lived in Wales, some local 'tree-huggers' decided they wanted to stop a planning application so they got hold of a 'footprint' of an otter, there was a stream running alongside the land subject to the planning applcation and they thought a few "otter prints" would stop the application.

 

They got away with it for some time until :

 

Someone pointed out that not only did the Otter have a 3 foot stride but it had 4 front feet and all of them were the front right foot.

 

 

 

We had a Badger sett on the farm and somehow the 'news' got out - we had an almost non-stop stream ,of trespassers breaking down the fences, we subsequently had horses get out and run free on the road because of it. After complainng to the Police it turned out that the local 'badger watch' had carte-blanche Government permission to access any land which was known to have Badgers on it - they visited the Sett every week to make sure we had not killed or dug the Badgers - they were the worst lot for breaking down the fences.

 

I respect the countryside, but it is better managed by the likes of Gamekeepers than it is by Tree-Huggers

Edited by Alan de Enfield
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These ultra-rare, endangered, great crested newts seem to pop up constantly all over the place. Everywhere there is a controversial building project.

 

They almost seem to have taken over from Sites of Special Scientific Interest as a reason to prevent everything.

 

MtB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These ultra-rare, endangered, great crested newts seem to pop up constantly all over the place. Everywhere there is a controversial building project.

 

They almost seem to have taken over from Sites of Special Scientific Interest as a reason to prevent everything.

 

MtB

 

 

It's almost like the wholsesale destruction of just about everything on earth is beyond human comprehension so all efforts are concentrated upon - bats, badgers, nesting birds and newts......... so if a newt is saved at a cost of £100K it's held up as how caring and prioritised we all really are whilst 100 trees are felling in the printing of the saved newt story and more emmissions are created in later years in the recouping of the £100K lost on mr newt.

Edited by mark99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I respect the countryside, but it is better managed by the likes of Gamekeepers

Yeah they do fine job they have managed to keep the UK population of Hen Harriers down to 4 nesting pairs.

 

They are managing the country really well and with great respect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah they do fine job they have managed to keep the UK population of Hen Harriers down to 4 nesting pairs.

 

They are managing the country really well and with great respect.

 

You must have been reading the Daily Mail - you should try the RSPB and Conservancy reports instead :

 

"According to the RSPB there are 646 pairs of hen harriers in the UK, and many can be seen moving around the country throughout the year. We are not about to see the last hen harrier in England".

 

"Moorland managed for grouse shooting also only accounts for around one-fifth of the uplands of England and Wales, yet the breeding success of hen harriers on the remaining four-fifths, which includes land managed by the RSPB, has been no better.

"Who is to blame there, as it cannot be grouse moor managers?"

 

Research by the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT) found that controlling predators like foxes and crows to protect red grouse on moorland helped birds of prey, including hen harriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It's almost like the wholsesale destruction of just about everything on earth is beyond human comprehension so all efforts are concentrated upon - bats, badgers, nesting birds and newts......... so if a newt is saved at a cost of £100K it's held up as how caring and prioritised we all really are whilst 100 trees are felling in the printing of the saved newt story and more emmissions are created in later years in the recouping of the £100K lost on mr newt.

 

Ah yes, bats. They are EVERYWHERE. It's hard to moor up of an evening and fail to see them flitting about in the dusk, yet their rarity is still cited as the reason the Greywell Tunnel (for example) cannot be repaired and the Basingstoke Canal opened up to the end.

 

Similarly thousands of churches all over the land are suffering damage from bat droppings all over the interiors and they are prevented by law from getting rid of the pests.

 

Madness, I tell you!

 

MtB

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.