Hoose Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 I keep noticing lots of people talking about having firebricks in their stoves? My stove was new and never came with any so I don't use them, are some stoves meant to have them and some not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bottle Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 If it came without them it probably does not need them but check with the manufacturer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keeping Up Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 What do you burn on your stove? Ours says you need them for coal but not for wood Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giggetty Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 (edited) I haven't got them and my tiny stove (4kW) isn't big enough to take them without unduly obtruding on the space for coal. However, it gets red hot very easily and when cleaning out I do notice, from time to time, some rust scales in the ash. This is curious as when fired there is, of course, a reducing atmosphere internally. So oxidation and delamination shouldn't occur. I try not to let overheating occur and so far (three winters) so good. Edited November 20, 2013 by Giggetty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoose Posted November 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 Thanks for the replies, won't bother getting any then. Sorted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbybass Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 Depends on internal size. My Morrso Squiggel had space for some. When they needed replacing..I bought cheapies from Wilkinsons... I also added an extra layer..left and right..to reduce the burning area...but that's personal choice... Used a bit of fire cement to stop them falling over... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kae Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 Depends on internal size. My Morrso Squiggel had space for some. I also added an extra layer..left and right..to reduce the burning area...but that's personal choice... That's the same as ours. We have the squirrel, with the usual firebrick side pieces, and then an actual "brick" shaped fire brick either side also. Reduces the internal volume and keeps the coal over the grate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathanA Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 If you are burning coal or coke and regulalry run your stove hot then it depends whether you think its cheaper to replace fire bricks or the stove... I've seen a number of expensive wood burning stoves without fire bricks ruined by being overfired with coal/coke so that they crack and/or distort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madcat Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 Try some Wilko cheapies if you plan to burn coal, I would just because I'm a curious old cat ( plenty of lives left still) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigsawged Posted November 20, 2013 Report Share Posted November 20, 2013 I agree with JonathanA, fire bricks can be useful in reducing the stresses that might otherwise occur in the cast metal. The added benefit is that you tend to use a lot less coal and still get the benefit of a hearty fire. In our Squirrel, as well as firebricks, we also use cast iron "Cheeks" which further reduces the size of the firebox with more reduction on coal used whilst still enjoying all the heat we need. I would add that I like it hot and it certainly does that for me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now