Jump to content

Historic Boats for sale online


alan_fincher

Featured Posts

18 hours ago, archie57 said:

This was only  rebuilt in the 1980s, pretty well unaltered until then, sold off fairly soon afterwards. Notable for having had the last Petter PD2 in Waterways ownership. 

 

I'm sure my brother has put these on here before, but probably no longer visible due to Photobucket no longer being allowed to host them for diplay on another ite.

Cambourne at work in the mid-1970s. (Photos copyright Mike Fincher)
 

Sam Brooks Cambourne2.jpg

sam Brooks Cambourne.jpg

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a particular reason why BW chopped the back end off these boats and put a new one on? Was it simply because it was cheaper than rebuilding the original or some other reason. 

 

As it happens they usually seem to be quite pleasing and not bodged but I do wonder why it happened in the first place. 

 

This must have been discussed before but as Cambourne has come up it got me wondering. 

 

Draught reduction?

Edited by magnetman
Edit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, magnetman said:

Is there a particular reason why BW chopped the back end off these boats and put a new one on? Was it simply because it was cheaper than rebuilding the original or some other reason. 

 

As it happens they usually seem to be quite pleasing and not bodged but I do wonder why it happened in the first place. 

 

This must have been discussed before but as Cambourne has come up it got me wondering. 

 

Draught reduction?

I don't think anything has been done to reduce the draught, has it?
 

Not a very clear photo, but everything under the counter looks pretty normal for a Large Woolwich to me.

 

47013219_10156766727057487_3368992365824

 

The counter sides are the originals back virtually as far as the back of the cabin, and the counter beyond that doesn't appear that unusual to me, other than it lacks cants.

 

Are you convinced anything other than the outer steel of the round of counter has been chopped off or overplated?  I'm not convinced it is more severe than that.

If that was required, by this stage it would certainly have been done by welding, not in rivet work.  When my brother acquired Bilster the counter was shot, (you could see through it, I think).  Probably the result of continuous ramming by buttys in tow.  A normal repair back in the 1970s, even for an enthusiast, and certainly for the BW maintenance fleet, would be done welded.

 

45 Years on Bilster has not been changed.

16835800875_aebbf4c4f9_b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Derek R. said:

 

The term is 'Space Invader', so called due to the wide gunnels invading the space in the cabin.


An interesting idea, though I have never heard that name used.

It can't have come from the Space Invader video game surely, because whilst boats like Cambourne undoubtedly got the treatment after that game was first launched, some boats had surely received similar cabins significantly before that was the case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, alan_fincher said:

I don't think anything has been done to reduce the draught, has it?
 

Not a very clear photo, but everything under the counter looks pretty normal for a Large Woolwich to me.

 

47013219_10156766727057487_3368992365824

 

The counter sides are the originals back virtually as far as the back of the cabin, and the counter beyond that doesn't appear that unusual to me, other than it lacks cants.

 

Are you convinced anything other than the outer steel of the round of counter has been chopped off or overplated?  I'm not convinced it is more severe than that.

There's a few dents on that plating round the stern, suggesting it was replated/overplated during working boat days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wondered why the counter was replaced. Had not seen the out of water picture. 

 

I like to see the dents. I suppose as the boats were still in trade it was sensible to replace damaged and thin parts. 

 

Eta it seems to me that it was wholesale replating rather than cutting out the thin bits they cut the whole lot off (counter) and replaced it. Its not just the underwater bits. 

 

 

Looking at the photo it appears the boat has at some point been refooted (replated not over plated) but I fear that it has subsequently been overplated possibly due to silly insurance requirements. 

 

I hope not !! 

 

 

Edited by magnetman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, mark99 said:

Is Bilster used as a trip boat or educational etc or is it just fortunate to have that mooring?

The latter, I think.

But I don't know anything about who owns it currently.

(No doubt mrsmelly would say it is dead unlucky to have that mooring, given where it is!)

Edited by alan_fincher
  • Happy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, alan_fincher said:


An interesting idea, though I have never heard that name used.

It can't have come from the Space Invader video game surely, because whilst boats like Cambourne undoubtedly got the treatment after that game was first launched, some boats had surely received similar cabins significantly before that was the case?

Certainly wasn't anything to do with the Space Invader game. Ask Ian Tyler, it's all he ever called the narrow cabin'd BW maintenance craft with said cabins. An explanation of "Space Ship" would certainly be challenging!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/12/2018 at 16:18, alan_fincher said:

I don't think anything has been done to reduce the draught, has it?
 

Not a very clear photo, but everything under the counter looks pretty normal for a Large Woolwich to me.

 

47013219_10156766727057487_3368992365824

 

The counter sides are the originals back virtually as far as the back of the cabin, and the counter beyond that doesn't appear that unusual to me, other than it lacks cants.

 

Are you convinced anything other than the outer steel of the round of counter has been chopped off or overplated?  I'm not convinced it is more severe than that.

If that was required, by this stage it would certainly have been done by welding, not in rivet work.  When my brother acquired Bilster the counter was shot, (you could see through it, I think).  Probably the result of continuous ramming by buttys in tow.  A normal repair back in the 1970s, even for an enthusiast, and certainly for the BW maintenance fleet, would be done welded.

 

45 Years on Bilster has not been changed.

16835800875_aebbf4c4f9_b.jpg

The underwater parts look untouched but the counter looks flatter than the original, the upsweep on town class boats being minimal to start with. I don't like it as it gives the illusion that the counter is sloping backwards, and coupled with the flat cabin profile really spoils the lines of this craft.

  From the pictures it looks like nearly all the knees will require attention in the future. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 Malvern sounded interesting. If I were to get back into narrow boats it would be a converted FM&C boat. 

 

Shame about the counter, and the engine, and the interior and the windows. 

 

Nice bows though !

Edited by magnetman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, magnetman said:

 Malvern sounded interesting. If I were to get back into narrow boats it would be a converted FM&C boat. 

 

Shame about the counter, and the engine, and the interior and the windows. 

 

Nice bows though !

Shame Braunston didn't bother to take a photo of the complete front end though. :ninja:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, matty40s said:

Shame Braunston didn't bother to take a photo of the complete front end though. :ninja:

Like this ???

P1050242.JPG

 

 

Best not to take too many of the superstructure though, or they might show how flat it isn't!

 

 

 

IMAG0165.jpg

Edited by alan_fincher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't see it on my phone either. 

 

That cabin distortion is quite severe ! Almost looks like it had a serious localised interior fire event at some point. Unusual to see that level of distortion in a normal steel cabin. 

Edited by magnetman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/12/2018 at 16:51, magnetman said:

Is there a particular reason why BW chopped the back end off these boats and put a new one on? Was it simply because it was cheaper than rebuilding the original or some other reason. 

 

As it happens they usually seem to be quite pleasing and not bodged but I do wonder why it happened in the first place. 

 

This must have been discussed before but as Cambourne has come up it got me wondering. 

 

Draught reduction?

ISTR that the requirements for maintenance crew cabs required more space to accommodate the sink cooker etc the cabin hadn't the space & it would have meant building extra cabin & splitting the crew set up .It was found if the power uint was positioned as far back as poss part of the cabin could along with engine "ole"give the required space for crew fittings I guess costed out it was cheaper/better  than cabin  alteration /modification some one probably came up with drawings/specs of the "Severners "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25 February 2013 at 17:59, alan_fincher said:

An unusually large number of historic boats on the open market at the moment.

 

Often they don't get publicly advertised.

 

These are I think all fairly recent additions....

 

Butty "Taurus" (Price includes "Free" Roger Fuller motor "Snipe"! - Hotel boats)

 

"Andromeda"

 

"Lancing" (Trip Boat)

 

"Sharpness"

 

 

These have all been around a while, I think - try an offer!

 

"Cambourne"

 

"Hawkesbury"

 

"Bletchley" & "Argus"

 

Butty "Lyra"

 

"Seaford"

 

"Mountbatten" & "Jellicoe"

Another just gone come up for sale. Sun reg no: 49723 here roydon Marina motorised butty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Billy Boy said:

Another just gone come up for sale. Sun reg no: 49723 here roydon Marina motorised butty. 

This one presumably?

 

Quote

Sun Built by Thomas Bantock - Length : 21.336 metres ( 70 feet ) - Beam : 2.04 metres ( 6 feet 8 inches ). Metal hull N/A . Registered with Canal & River Trust number 49723 as a Powered Motor Boat.  ( Last updated on Wednesday 22nd May 2013 )


Any more information, please ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it the SUN previously moored up between the white bear and tesco in Ricky on the backwater formed by the Colne flowing down from just below  lot mead lock and exiting the cut just before batchworth lock on the non towpath side.  Or is that the Gade, I guess its both technically. 

 

Edited by magnetman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.