Jump to content

Commuter cyclists urged to avoid Regent's Canal


Featured Posts

I wonder if anyone will listen though? It is so busy in town and now it costs squillions of pounds to get the bus or tube, bike ownership is exploding.

 

I don't mind the cyclists up here so much, there aren't as many, the path is really wide and cyclists tend to use the marsh paths, which are even wider and in better condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foe all those of us who have been mown down on the towpath:

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-20782950

 

Tim

 

Why are the powers that be AGAIN being pc and namby pamby. Ban the idiots.......if ya buy a vehicle use it on the roads where it belongs and leave tow paths to boaters, walkers etc.

 

Tim

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please no, don't ban cyclists - especially us female boaters rely on our bikes to get back to our boats safely without being mugged when it is dark.

 

You need to get back to Nottla, a site safer place to live and oodles of proper rivers and canals to live on. If the world had piles they would be in London. Drop an atomic bomb in the centre and it would do 50 pence worth of damage :cheers:

 

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to get back to Nottla, a site safer place to live and oodles of proper rivers and canals to live on. If the world had piles they would be in London. Drop an atomic bomb in the centre and it would do 50 pence worth of damage :cheers:

 

Tim

 

Probably the most predictable post of the day :-)

 

Tim

  • Greenie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that to stop cyclists speeding on the canal towpath they want to spend loads of money creating a cycle lane down the centre of the road .Whilst i am all in favour of more safe cycling routs rewarding morons rather than educating them to safe practice rankles a bit but i guess you are better off keeping all the morons in the same place LOL. Would cobbled surfaces help slow bikes down do you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was broadcast a program on the 'box' over the so called 'war' between cyclists and vehicle users on our roads recently. Must admit I was so sickened by the attitudes put forth from the first five minutes - I switched off. I had already had enough experience of the burgeoning race of urban geurillas during a period of over twenty years of delivering.

 

One of the problems arising from the seemingly new generation of cyclists, is that given so much in the way of lanes and priveleges, they have become self appointed eco-warriors doing battle with the poisonous motorised vehicle. Making segregated lanes and prioritising road space for selected vehicles creates antipathy amongst road users. It also create congestion.

 

Towing paths should be havens away from wheeled traffic other than lock wheelers and maintenance vehicles. On the roads, cyclists would need to accept and respect that they are part and parcel of all road traffic without any such segregated and prioritised lanes. In doing so, not only would they get more respect from other road users, but they may be able to appreciate where roads in general could be safer for all through education and the acceptance that road safety is all generated between the ears.

 

The 'eco' has gone Ego.

 

I ride a bicycle when I need to, and during the sixties rode regularly from Wood Green to Regent's Park home to work - and yes, there was a lot of traffic even back then - nothing new. What is new are underpasses and far too many traffic signals which create grand prix driving. Take most away and traffic engages in blending more safely together and through any junction - less risk to all.

 

Mountain bikes - where's the mountain? Dayglo, Lycra, flashing led lights aimed to dazzle = aggression.

Edited by Derek R.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

flashing led lights aimed to dazzle = aggression.

 

To be fair to them _ I appreciate these types making themselves much easier to see after dark than the idiots who ride around in the dark with poor or even worse no lighting at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can address the same criticism to mere pedestrians: surely we all have a duty to make ourselves more visible to the poor motorist with steamed-up windows and the radio turned up, who is trying to compose a text message?

 

Sorry I don't understand your point _ I don't txt while driving, nor drive with steamed up windows and actually rarely have the radio on at all. But yes some pedestrians could indeed make themselves more visible especially if walking on a road with no footpath.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is digressing from the strictly towpath behaviour of some cyclists, but our 'duty' whilst out and about is surely to use care and consideration to all others, regardless of whether we walk, ride or drive. Dressing up like Christmas trees and using daytime lights is only buck passing, creating a world in which ones responsibilities for being aware of others is being passed on to another through another not wearing or using so called safety paraphernalia. Lights are to be used during inclement weather and after lighting up time. The downside of using lights during daytime is that they can cause dazzle and 'camouflage' another hazard emerging.

 

So much of health and safety is in the creation of administration and legislation that feeds directly into the litigation courts - and there's only one winner in that lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is digressing from the strictly towpath behaviour of some cyclists, but our 'duty' whilst out and about is surely to use care and consideration to all others, regardless of whether we walk, ride or drive. Dressing up like Christmas trees and using daytime lights is only buck passing, creating a world in which ones responsibilities for being aware of others is being passed on to another through another not wearing or using so called safety paraphernalia. Lights are to be used during inclement weather and after lighting up time. The downside of using lights during daytime is that they can cause dazzle and 'camouflage' another hazard emerging.

 

So much of health and safety is in the creation of administration and legislation that feeds directly into the litigation courts - and there's only one winner in that lot.

 

I don't think I said other wise did I?.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ditch the racing bikes with loads of gears for the old bone shaker bikes with one gear.Reduce city speed limits to 20 miles an hour and triple road tax and err..... How about kicking speeding and enjoy the journey again with consideration for others :cheers: Nah never work :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If boats are limited to 4mph, then towpath traffic should be limited to the same. I mean I might want to tow a boat with a horse one day. Oh and put some really nasty speed humps in . Cyclists seem to think the can use towpaths at faster than walking speed, which is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.