Mike has reported that he has been banned, I presume it's related to the recently closed threads involving Memories, obviously I could be wrong but it seems a tad harsh 

Tfft. 

Edited February 16Feb 16 by pete23

Is that the prolific poster that everytime I see him I think it says mammaries? 

57 minutes ago, tree monkey said:

Mike has reported that he has been banned, I presume it's related to the recently closed threads involving Memories, obviously I could be wrong but it seems a tad harsh 

Not banned...

 

On behalf of the Mods

5 minutes ago, 1st ade said:

Not banned...

 

On behalf of the Mods

Ta for that 

11 minutes ago, 1st ade said:

Not banned...

 

On behalf of the Mods

That’s good news as far as I’m concerned. Hopefully it’s nothing more than a temporary suspension or he’s taking a break after a warning.

 

I know he sometimes rubs people up the wrong way (but don’t we all to some degree?) but this would be a far less useful (and amusing) place without him.

 

Ffs.

Opinions may vary.

48 minutes ago, Lily Rose said:

That’s good news as far as I’m concerned. Hopefully it’s nothing more than a temporary suspension or he’s taking a break after a warning.

 

I know he sometimes rubs people up the wrong way (but don’t we all to some degree?) but this would be a far less useful (and amusing) place without him.

 

Maybe he has been put on the norty step for a while? After all, he does drive a milk float 😜 

1 minute ago, mrsmelly said:

Maybe he has been put on the norty step for a while? After all, he does drive a milk float 😜 

Does that mean I could be next?

Just now, Lily Rose said:

Does that mean I could be next?

If the cap fits 🤣 

Just now, mrsmelly said:

If the cap fits 🤣 

On another vein I have just been distressed to see that all my warning points have expired 😱 

Just now, mrsmelly said:

If the cap fits 🤣 

I think I may have mentioned this before, but I’ve got a lot of caps. So many in fact that I’d be prepared to swap one if the right opportunity came along. If only someone had something of matching value to get rid of.

 

16 minutes ago, Lily Rose said:

I think I may have mentioned this before, but I’ve got a lot of caps. So many in fact that I’d be prepared to swap one if the right opportunity came along. If only someone had something of matching value to get rid of.

 

 

What about furniture - some of that seems to hold its value ?

2 minutes ago, Alan de Enfield said:

 

What about furniture - some of that seems to hold its value ?

Only if it’s lovely.

1 minute ago, Lily Rose said:

Only if it’s lovely.

 

I know where there is a sofa with slightly non-matching, faded, cushions - any interest ?

3 minutes ago, Alan de Enfield said:

 

I know where there is a sofa with slightly non-matching, faded, cushions - any interest ?

I have often thought of replacing my two bench seats with a comfy sofa that has a lot of storage to replace some of what I’d lose from the two bench seats. My concern would be putting too much weight on one side of the boat causing it to list.

 

Would I Lie To You… TRUE

 

Is the sofa you’re thinking of well-built but not overly heavy?

 

If not then I’m not sure it would be suitable for my boat, or possibly any other narrow boat.

 

2 hours ago, 1st ade said:

Not banned...

 

On behalf of the Mods

Mike has posted the email on FB which says he's banned from posting for four days.

So?

3 hours ago, tree monkey said:

Mike has reported that he has been banned, I presume it's related to the recently closed threads involving Memories, obviously I could be wrong but it seems a tad harsh 

I missed all the action. What is he accused of?

There is a difference between being restricted from posting for x days and being banned, cast in to the outer darkness with no possibility of return to the sunny world of CWDF. 

4 minutes ago, Russ T said:

I missed all the action. What is he accused of?

 

Human rights infringement.

 

 

1 minute ago, Jen-in-Wellies said:

There is a difference between being restricted from posting for x days and being banned, cast in to the outer darkness with no possibility of return to the sunny world of CWDF. 

 

1 minute ago, Jen-in-Wellies said:

There is a difference between being restricted from posting for x days and being banned, cast in to the outer darkness with no possibility of return to the sunny world of CWDF. 

 

 

Is the difference that you post about it twice ?

Edited February 16Feb 16 by Alan de Enfield

Just now, Alan de Enfield said:

 

Human rights infringement.

Isn't restricting his posting a human rights infringement too?

2 minutes ago, Russ T said:

Isn't restricting his posting a human rights infringement too?

Only if he has a protected characteristic. Which now I come to think of it...

1 minute ago, nicknorman said:

Only if he has a protected characteristic. Which now I come to think of it...

You don't mean....Mike is pregnant?

10 minutes ago, Russ T said:

You don't mean....Mike is pregnant?

Did you think Mike was short for Michael?

 

It was Michaela all along but he had been identifying as a man.

 

Anyway, gender is irrelevant. Or is it? Maybe not when pregnancy is involved.

 

I dunno, being a bit of a dinosaur I’m a bit confused about these modern ways of thinking.

If he's only banned from posting for four days that means he can read it if people start saying nice things about him 😬 Can we delete this thread before he comes back, and pretend it never happened and noone noticed?