Jump to content

Gold standard solid fuel - five stars


LadyG

Featured Posts

I'm sure lots of people have had crumbly, dusty, damp and dirty smokeless fuel.

Well, I have to report the Realflame Premium Gold Standard (from Ace Energy), is just as good as it gets.

It's dry, perfectly formed, burns easily, low ash. Well worth the premium price, about £18.25.

I suspect it's sieved to remove dust and debris, and I can guess where that goes!

 

Edited by LadyG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://smokecontrol.defra.gov.uk/fuel-details.php?id=212

 

comprise 65% to 70% petroleum coke and 25% anthracite (both by weight) together with a cold setting resin binder, hardener and low temperature stabiliser as to the remaining weight

 

 

----

 

Petcoke product. Lots of heat watch out or the grate burning away.

At least it has less binder than some of the other ones which would account for the lack of 'ash' which in most cases is actually a non combustible product rather than the product of combustion.

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, magnetman said:

https://smokecontrol.defra.gov.uk/fuel-details.php?id=212

 

comprise 65% to 70% petroleum coke and 25% anthracite (both by weight) together with a cold setting resin binder, hardener and low temperature stabiliser as to the remaining weight

 

 

----

 

Petcoke product. Lots of heat watch out or the grate burning away.

If I have to replace the grate every year it will be a price worth paying, no sign of any damage so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its good this year, keep your fingers crossed they haven't fiddled with the recipe for next year. 

 

The last batch of fuel we had wrecked the boiler and grate in one winter. The same stuff we always use. This year, and, all others they have been fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, LadyG said:

I'm sure lots of people have had crumbly, dusty, damp and dirty smokeless fuel.

Well, I have to report the Realflame Premium Gold Standard (from Ace Energy), is just as good as it gets.

It's dry, perfectly formed, burns easily, low ash. Well worth the premium price, about £18.25.

I suspect it's sieved to remove dust and debris, and I can guess where that goes!

 

That has to be a big selling point. Although I haven't bought much coal this winter having been off the boat, pretty much all the fuel I have bought in recent years has been soaking wet. Yes, it still burns, but it seems to me that you are paying for a load of water in your fuel, which must be a 'bargain' for the fuel companies. I originally thought it was just a consequence of buying fuel from canal-side suppliers who store their fuel outside, but then visited my sister's house which is heated by a coal fire delivered by a local company, and the fuel they were putting on was soaking wet as well, starts to look deliberate to me:unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Loddon said:

What people fail to appreciate is that the plastic bags fuel is stored in are permeable, so if you leave them out in the rain the contents get wet ;)

 

Not disputing what you say but, if they are permeable, how is it that the water never seems to drain out? (only 'drains' in, seemingly:unsure:)

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Wanderer Vagabond said:

Not disputing what you say but, if they are permeable, how is it that the water never seems to drain out? (only 'drains' in, seemingly:unsure:)

 I used to cover my ton of bags with a tarp and after a few weeks it was mostly dry.

The stuff in my front well deck is dry, stored in my shed from October to December and under cover in the well deck since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's also the possibility of differing quality of the same fuel from sealed bags.

Yards that sell Homefire for example can have it delivered in bulk then bag and seal it on site, in printed bags. 

So the nice dry, dust free bags you bought from Bob's Solid Fuel could be completely different to the same stuff from Charlie's Coal Boat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Homefire Ovals contents

 

(from DEFRA website)

  comprise anthracite fines (as to approximately 50 to 75% of the total weight), petroleum coke (as to approximately 20 to 45% of the total weight), bituminous coal (as to approximately 5 to 17% of the total weight) and an organic binder (as to the remaining weight)

 

So, taking the smaller figures of 50, 20 and 5 we end up with 25% of the weight of the product being an "organic binder". Most organic materials include moisture. Some of them use molasses. 

 

This could be where the moisture is coming from.

 

I don't understand how the figures for contents can be so widely variable for a branded product. Perhaps I am misreading it. 

 

Being a bit of a cynic I think they will use the minimum legal amounts of burny burny for the products so what exactly is the binder? If one is buying a product it is slightly odd for 25% of it to be an unknown content. Surely buyers have the right to know exactly what is going in their fires. 

wood is better because it is a natural product not manufactured with unknown ingredients. 

 

For example if the binder was of animal origin would they not be obliged to tell vegans about this ?

 

 

Edited by magnetman
minor typo and removed accidental mild sex references
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, magnetman said:

Homefire Ovals contents

 

(from DEFRA website)

  comprise anthracite fines (as to approximately 50 to 75% of the total weight), petroleum coke (as to approximately 20 to 45% of the total weight), bituminous coal (as to approximately 5 to 17% of the total weight) and an organic binder (as to the remaining weight)

 

So, taking the smaller figures of 50, 20 and 5 we end up with 25% of the weight of the product being an "organic binder". Most organic materials include moisture. Some of them use molasses. 

 

This could be where the moisture is coming from.

 

I don't understand how the figures for contents can be so widely variable for a branded product. Perhaps I am misreading it. 

 

Being a bit of a cynic I think they will use the minimum legal amounts of burny burny for the products so what exactly is the binder? If one is buying a product it is slightly odd for 25% of it to be an unknown content. Surely buyers have the right to know exactly what is going in their fires. 

wood is better because it is a natural product not manufactured with unknown ingredients. 

 

For example if the binder was of animal origin would they not be obliged to tell vegans about this ?

 

 

 

Also, taking the sum of the higher values of 75%, 45% and 17% = %137%, it looks to me as though the manu has almost carte blanche to widely vary the proportions of constituents to suit it on the day, to make a batch.

 

This looseness in specification might explain continuing reports of wide variations in characteristics of supposedly the same fuel from one purchase to the next. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, robtheplod said:

I've never seen a dry bag of coal... either self stored or just purchased it always seems to be wet when i open it... :(

 

Its a recent thing.

 

Bagged coal for me was normally dry until a year or two ago, when it changed to always wet. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MtB said:

Also, taking the sum of the higher values of 75%, 45% and 17% = %137%, it looks to me as though the manu has almost carte blanche to widely vary the proportions of constituents to suit it on the day, to make a batch.

Yeah. But on a good day you get more than 1 1/3 bags of fuel, but on a bad day only 3/4 of a bag.😃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I just naturally sceptical or do the executives of Homefire have friends in DEFRA?

The specification of Homefire Brazier, undoubtedly the worst fuel I've used in two winters:

comprise anthracite fines (as to approximately 60 to 80% of the total weight), petroleum coke (as to approximately 10 to 30% of the total weight), bituminous coal (as to approximately 0 to 17% of the total weight) and molasses/acid or an organic binder (as the remaining weight);

 

So, in the lowest specification case, just 70% burnable material and up to 30% an unspecified "organic binder" (the ash of which was coarse and abrasive like fine grit).

 

Imagine buying an electric heater with such loose standards: "Consumption 0.7kW to 1.5kW". Or a packet of crisps: "Salt content 1g to 2g per serving, remaining weight made up of crystalline solids"

 

A quick scan shows Homefire products to be the most laxly specified; the OP's Realflame product seems more reasonable.

Edited by Puffling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose if it is ready to burn it must be okay. 

 

Interesting to see how this goes as "smoke free" zones get widened to include people who never expected to be criminalised for burning wood in their open fires. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/03/2023 at 06:10, magnetman said:

For example if the binder was of animal origin would they not be obliged to tell vegans about this ?

 

Is there any obligation to label anything as not suitable for vegans?

It may be a nice way to appeal to people who are vegan (and I'm sure no-one would ever think they could charge a premium) but I would have thought that anyone who describes themself as vegan would assume that all products are not suitable unless and until they check. 

 

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this to do with fines or powder? I don't know if there have been examples of manufactured products having this problem..

 

Some of the briquette products are formed at high temperature which one might assume would drive off moisture. 

It would be reasonably interesting to know how much external energy goes into production of 'ready to burn' products. It might be a bit naughty and unsustainable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/03/2023 at 18:20, Wanderer Vagabond said:

That has to be a big selling point. Although I haven't bought much coal this winter having been off the boat, pretty much all the fuel I have bought in recent years has been soaking wet. Yes, it still burns, but it seems to me that you are paying for a load of water in your fuel, which must be a 'bargain' for the fuel companies. I originally thought it was just a consequence of buying fuel from canal-side suppliers who store their fuel outside, but then visited my sister's house which is heated by a coal fire delivered by a local company, and the fuel they were putting on was soaking wet as well, starts to look deliberate to me:unsure:

Round here coal merchants store the coal outside in heaps, being in the Lake District it is almost always wet.   Nothing deliberate merely weather conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having some bagged house coal delivered to the London boat shortly. Not for use here obviously but I think I might dig out the scales and check it out. 

 

It seems to me someone would be onto this if it were a deliberate scam. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.