Jump to content

The National Bargee Travellers Association has slammed plans to raise licence fees on canals like the Kennet and Avon


Alan de Enfield

Featured Posts

It reads as if the protected assets (presumably this means canals) are only protected while there is a government grant in place. 

 

Does this mean that if and when the grant is removed the obligation to protect the assets no longer exists? 

 

 

IMG_20230318_173354.jpg.985aafa9dd876e99058a5b99a3234284.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MartynG said:

Indeed it does 

C&RT are trustees (guardians) not  owners .

The assertion I originally questioned was that the CRT canals were 'owned by the people'. They are not as they were transferred 'out of public ownership' as it states in the document I provided a copy of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Orwellian said:

The assertion I originally questioned was that the CRT canals were 'owned by the people'. They are not as they were transferred 'out of public ownership' as it states in the document I provided a copy of.

So who actually owns them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, magnetman said:

Is this well known ? 

 

Yes - the information is in the public domain and is registered at companies house.

Anyone that wanted to know it had the oppoprtunity to read it.

 

(Along with a long list of what C&RT can, and cannot, do, the criteria for retaining the grant etc etc etc)

Edited by Alan de Enfield
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, peterboat said:

Exactly still owned by the state

Yes . Owned  by the nation forever.

image.png.af7f2b51b755556caa444372b4d7df3a.png

 

Similarly National Trust don't own property .

 

So perhaps C&RT are not permitted to sell off or mortgage property in their care ?. But they can rent it out (as do national trust with houses in their care).

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One would need to see what administrative powers the Trustees have before coming to the conclusion that they can not dispose of assets.

 

There must be more detail to all this but perhaps as it has been transferred out of public ownership that detail is not available to the public. 

 

 

It seems reasonably interesting that Canal and River Trading CIC have 4 directors and £40 million of assets. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, magnetman said:

There must be more detail to all this but perhaps as it has been transferred out of public ownership that detail is not available to the public. 

 

Yes it is.

 

9 minutes ago, magnetman said:

One would need to see what administrative powers the Trustees have before coming to the conclusion that they can not dispose of assets.

 

 

Yes they can but some things need the approval of the B member.

 

28.1 There shall be two classes of Members, as follows:

 

28.1.1 “A Members” shall be those individuals who serve on the Council, appointed in accordance with Article 29 and the Rules, and collectively the A Members shall be known as the Council.

 

28.1.2 The “B Member” who shall be the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs;

Edited by Alan de Enfield
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Alan de Enfield said:

 

Yes it is.

 

 

Yes they can but some things need the approval of the B member.

 

28.1 There shall be two classes of Members, as follows:

 

28.1.1 “A Members” shall be those individuals who serve on the Council, appointed in accordance with Article 29 and the Rules, and collectively the A Members shall be known as the Council.

 

28.1.2 The “B Member” who shall be the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs;

So the state owns it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no expert on this but it looks like it belongs to a CIC who need sec of state approval to do anything major. 

 

Maybe it does belong to the public but this is not my impression from the given information.

 

Someone who actually knows about all this sort of thing would be really handy to get rid of any assumptions which may pop up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Orwellian said:

No it doesn't. Read the following carefully. I've highlighted a section to assist

Screenshot_20230318-171602_1_1.png

Screenshot_20230318-192402_1.png

C&RT hold the canals in trust for the nation which is not the same as owning the canals.

image.png.c0016ff4c215d6882883e271f15ed3df.png

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are both trustees and ultimate owners. There is a caveat on the ownership that they need DEFRA's permission to do anything significant, the details of which are too boring to research.

 

It doesn't actually matter who ultimately owns them, because what matters is how the trustee/navigation authority runs it. 

 

If anyone can give a reasonable scenario where ownership by either public or trustee would make a difference, let us know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, magnetman said:

One would need to see what administrative powers the Trustees have before coming to the conclusion that they can not dispose of assets.

 

There must be more detail to all this but perhaps as it has been transferred out of public ownership that detail is not available to the public. 

 

 

It seems reasonably interesting that Canal and River Trading CIC have 4 directors and £40 million of assets. 

 

 

£40 Million seems like a low number

£1000Million is more like it 

image.png.82e432f6dba759dac6496ac6f6129903.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The £40m is for Canal and River Trading CIC.

 

I was not sure how to interpret the earlier piece of information but to me it reads as they are the owners of the protected assets which I presume means the "track" ie locks and canals.

 

 

 

IMG_20230318_173354.jpg

So what is "the grant agreement" which provides for protection of the protected assets? Is this a grant from the CRT to the CRT CIC or is it the government grant from DEFRA?

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/08069602/filing-history

 

Screenshot2023-03-18at20-09-38companies_house_document_pdf.png.b1a6044900f03a6455ea3b74db6d9a0a.png

Edited by magnetman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, magnetman said:

I was not sure how to interpret the earlier piece of information but to me it reads as they are the owners of the protected assets which I presume means the "track" ie locks and canals.

 

 

 

Rather than speculating it really would be worth your while to read the documents as they list in great detail what the 'protected assest' are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.