Jump to content

An extra charge for the top end of the Llangollen?


David Mack

Featured Posts

"Everyone who overnights in Wales, whether it be in a luxury hotel, a cosy holiday cottage or the most basic campsite, may face a “visitor levy” under a hugely controversial Welsh government scheme.

The Labour-led government has launched a consultation on the proposal that could result in almost all visitors – including Welsh residents staying away from home – being taxed for their stays."

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/20/wales-may-impose-visitor-levy-on-overnight-guests

 

But how would they implement it for visiting canal boats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine it's actually just taxed on hospitality accommodation or places that already charge.  A bit like the tourist tax in Amsterdam, it's added to your hotel/AirBnB/wherever bill.

 

If places charge for overnight mooring, then you get tax added to the fee.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So in the unlikely event that they tried to apply a potential new tax to boaters staying overnight in Wales, how would it work? 

For example, the Llangollen briefly enters Wales for a mile or two around Bettisfield, and then not again until Chirk aqueduct. 

So if I was to overnight near Bettisfield, how would anyone from officialdom know (unless maybe CRTs spotters tell them)?

Will there be someone stationed at Chirk taking boat numbers and dates when the boats move in and out of Wales, and then the authorities will send on a bill?

Would they add a levy onto the existing mooring charges around Llangollen, or send traffic warden types around every morning to check on who was there? 

Its difficult to see how it could be operated in a way that would be cost effective. 

 

 

Edited by Tony1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tony1 said:

 

So in the unlikely event that they tried to apply a potential new tax to boaters staying overnight in Wales, how would it work? 

For example, the Llangollen briefly enters Wales for a mile or two around Bettisfield, and then not again until Chirk aqueduct. 

So if I was to overnight near Bettisfield, how would anyone from officialdom know (unless maybe CRTs spotters tell them)?

Will there be someone stationed at Chirk taking boat numbers and dates when the boats move in and out of Wales, and then the authorities will send on a bill?

Would they add a levy onto the existing mooring charges around Llangollen, or send traffic warden types around every morning to check on who was there? 

Its difficult to see how it could be operated in a way that would be cost effective. 

 

 

I think all this was being said that the £6 per night charge for mooring in Llangollen would possibly attract this "tourist tax" and would therefore go up. 

 

The impact of that would really depend on how it is levied; if it is a percentage of the charge then its likely to be peanuts on a £6 charge, but is the levy is a fixed charge per person per night is could be significant and much more than the mooring charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A tourist tax is not a new idea.

As an example we chartered a yacht in 2018 in Greece but stayed the first night in hotel. The tourist tax, which as a small sum per room, for that night was collected by the hotel.  Google says its currently  from 4 Euros per night but the charge depends , in Greece , on the star rating of the hotel.

We were not asked for tax on the yacht when staying at various harbours during the week , one of which made a small charge for an overnight stay.

 

Other countries make similar charges but are probably included in rate you pay for the accommodation. 

 

I expect  if you visited Wales and stayed with friends at their home , for example ,  or in your own boat the tax would not apply unless you were paying for accommodation.

 

https://www.euronews.com/travel/2022/01/18/tourist-taxes-all-of-the-countries-you-will-have-to-pay-to-enter-in-2022#:~:text=Greece,help cut the country's debt.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tourist taxes of a few EUR/USD/UKP/whatever per night are common in many places in the world to bring in extra revenue to help pay for facilities that tourists use (including general strain on infrastructure), and tourism doesn't collapse as a result because the tourist tax is tiny compared to the other costs of being a tourist.

 

Why would Wales be any different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have skimmed through the consultation document.  Here are a few observations.

 

.  Boats (narrow boats) are specifically called out in examples alongside the charge for land used to pitch a tent or caravan etc.  So it seems the intent is that it would apply to a visitor mooring charge

.  Three primary options on how to structure the levy

     . A charge per night for the accommodation (eg £1 per night irrespective of accommodation cost).

     . A charge per person per night (eg £1 per person per nights stay irrespective or accommodation cost).

     . A percentage of the accommodation cost (eg 1% of the accommodation cost).

     . A blended model of the above.

.  They are keen to have is consistent across all areas of Wales but would be administered by the local authority.

.  Where charges are made as part on the accommodation cost for items other than the accommodation, that element would not be taxed in the case of a percentage charge, eg B&B the cost of the breakfast would be separated from the cost of the bed and the levy only charged on the bed part.  
 

In terms on the charge at Llangollen this raises an interesting point, and CRT are perhaps going to have to change things a bit.  If is often said that the £6 charge is for the “free” electricity, if that is the case there in no accommodation cost and no levy on a percentage basis.

 

In terms of a marina offering visitor moorings (is it just Chirk marina that is in Wales?), you would assume they will need to charge the levy, but how do you distinguish that from a permanent mooring, eg 365 days, if you are allowed to stay on the boat presumably the levy applies.  There is however the proposal of a upper length of stay to which the levy would apply (eg 7 consequent days).  How that would be implemented on the permanent mooring is questionable, would each visit to the boat be a separate stay, eg every weekend you stay Saturday night on the boat, would you need to pay the levy each time you stay, that would seem to be the objective of the levy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, john6767 said:

 

In terms on the charge at Llangollen this raises an interesting point, and CRT are perhaps going to have to change things a bit.  If is often said that the £6 charge is for the “free” electricity, if that is the case there in no accommodation cost and no levy on a percentage basis.

 

 

Expensive electricity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, john6767 said:

Boats (narrow boats) are specifically called out in examples alongside the charge for land used to pitch a tent or caravan etc.  So it seems the intent is that it would apply to a visitor mooring charge

Which could cover mooring at a designated location such as Llangollen, where moorings are already charged for. But how does it cover mooring at a minor visitor mooring, or just tieing up to the towpath in the middle of nowhere?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, David Mack said:

Which could cover mooring at a designated location such as Llangollen, where moorings are already charged for. But how does it cover mooring at a minor visitor mooring, or just tieing up to the towpath in the middle of nowhere?

 

It wouldn't, because there's no way of paying it or enforcing it.

 

A tourist tax can only be applied if there's a transaction involved to which it can be added (e.g. a hotel room or AirBnB, or a Llangollen mooring).

 

As usual people are nit-picking and objecting to the details of implementation, when the elephant in the room is whether such a tax is a good idea or not. Many places worldwide which impose such a tax have found it's an effective way of raising some extra local revenue to pay for the depredations of tourism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, David Mack said:

Which could cover mooring at a designated location such as Llangollen, where moorings are already charged for. But how does it cover mooring at a minor visitor mooring, or just tieing up to the towpath in the middle of nowhere?

 

I can’t see the intention to do that, in the same way as if you stay with family/friends in Wales there will be no levy.

41 minutes ago, ditchcrawler said:

Expensive electricity

Yes, but there is the infrastructure cost to pay for as well.  But I thought it was basically a fudge to get over the fact that CRT don’t have the legal power to charge except where additional facilities (in this case electricity) are being provided.  If that it the case the levy may require the situation to be clarified.

 

In the main personally I am not against the idea of the levy, you would expect in the majority of the cases this will be a relatively small token charge that no one is going to case about.  There are certainly locations in the US where I have seen a few dollars a night added to a hotel bill as a local tax so it’s not new in a global market sense.  The interesting bit is how this will apply to boating, given they have declared the intent to charge boats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, john6767 said:

I can’t see the intention to do that, in the same way as if you stay with family/friends in Wales there will be no levy.

Yes, but there is the infrastructure cost to pay for as well.  But I thought it was basically a fudge to get over the fact that CRT don’t have the legal power to charge except where additional facilities (in this case electricity) are being provided.  If that it the case the levy may require the situation to be clarified.

 

In the main personally I am not against the idea of the levy, you would expect in the majority of the cases this will be a relatively small token charge that no one is going to case about.  There are certainly locations in the US where I have seen a few dollars a night added to a hotel bill as a local tax so it’s not new in a global market sense.  The interesting bit is how this will apply to boating, given they have declared the intent to charge boats.

 

Every single US hotel I've ever stayed in, in many different places -- and not just a tourist tax, see attached bill where the "add-on" local taxes are about 15% of the room charge...

ttax.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.