Jump to content

Keeping right


jake_crew

Featured Posts

On 08/03/2022 at 11:02, Derek R. said:

 

There are a few reasons given, though most will come down to those on horse would be right handed (in the main) and passing to the left of an opponent gave the right hand wielding a sword a better chance of landing a blow. Knights jousting, would ride on the left with the lance in the right hand and arm. The first Such 'jousing' matches had been held on the Scottish Borders as a way of releasing tensions between England and Scotland.  One such was held in 1390 on London Bridge between the champion of England, Lord John Welles, and the champion of Scotland, Sir David de Lindesay. The event was a spectacle that thousand thronged to see, the two parties charging one another three times, until eventually Lord Welles was unseated. Though injured, he did recover. Sir David tending his opponent at the scene. (The 'Old' bridge with all the shops houses and chapel on). Lasted over 600yrs that did. Cost of maintenance and congestion saw its demise.

 

But in 1722 a decision was made to enforce traffic (both foot and carriage) with the rule to cross the bridge on the left. Those coming into the City to keep to the West side of the bridge, those leaving the City to the East side. The Common Council, led by Lord Mayor Sir Gerard Conyers passed the 'keep to the left law', which would one day be taken up throughout Britain and a number of countries around the World from Australia to Japan.

'Old London Bridge' by Patricia Pierce.

 

Which begs another question: Why do so many countries in the World drive on the right?

 

The lance was held by the right hand but the knights rode on the right in a tournament, otherwise their balance would be all wrong.

 

Keith

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Derek R. said:

The lance was held by the right hand but the knights rode on the right in a tournament, otherwise their balance would be all wrong.

 

Keith

 

No wonder I was no good at it . . . .

Good job there were no left handed ones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/03/2022 at 15:16, Ronaldo47 said:

Thanks  for the correction, I knew it was one of the Scandinavian  countries. 

 

I recall reading that the Channel Islands switched to driving on the right during  the Nazi occupation. 

Myanmar drove on the left until 1970, now on the right. Which is unfortunate because many of the vehicles are right hand drive. Including the busses. So when you alight from a bus, it is straight into the flow of traffic, not the pavement. Somewhat alarming!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nicknorman said:

Myanmar drove on the left until 1970, now on the right. Which is unfortunate because many of the vehicles are right hand drive. Including the busses. So when you alight from a bus, it is straight into the flow of traffic, not the pavement. Somewhat alarming!

They are still using buses from before 1970?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, nicknorman said:

Myanmar drove on the left until 1970, now on the right. Which is unfortunate because many of the vehicles are right hand drive. Including the busses. So when you alight from a bus, it is straight into the flow of traffic, not the pavement. Somewhat alarming!

Thank goodness no one knows where it is.

They make nougat there, don't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Athy said:

Thank goodness no one knows where it is.

They make nougat there, don't they?

Well I know where it is because we went on holiday there before the latest coup. But of more interest is the border between Thailand and Myanmar at Tachileik, it’s a bridge over a fairly small river. On one side, the Thais drive on the left and 50 yds further on, the Burmese drive on the right. So when driving over the bridge one somehow has to change sides, with opposite direction vehicles also needing to change sides. It’s a sight to behold!

  • Greenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Athy said:

Thank goodness no one knows where it is.

They make nougat there, don't they?

 

Parading your ignorance of world politics is frankly, just embarrassing.

 

It used to be called "Burma" until a few years ago. Let's hope you recognise that.

 

(Let's hope I'm right too, lol!) 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MtB said:

 

Parading your ignorance of world politics is frankly, just embarrassing.

 

It used to be called "Burma" until a few years ago. Let's hope you recognise that.

 

(Let's hope I'm right too, lol!) 

I don't feel embarrassed in the slightest, but then I was, as I'm sure you realised, joking.

I was interested to note that the adjective "Burmese" is still in use (as per NN, anyway). A bit like the Persian Gulf, I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Athy said:

I don't feel embarrassed in the slightest, but then I was, as I'm sure you realised, joking.

I was interested to note that the adjective "Burmese" is still in use (as per NN, anyway). A bit like the Persian Gulf, I suppose.

The Burmese form a substantial part of the population of Myanmar, but by no means all. there are also several different native tribal populations who are not “Burmese”. Hence the new name. I suppose it is vaguely similar to the UK not being called ‘England” even though the majority are English. 

  • Greenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foreigners, especially the Americans, often use England as a synonym for the United Kingdom (of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to give it its full and somewhat cumbersome name), and it is something that clients have to be warned about when drawing up contracts. 

 

For example, in the absence of a specific definition to the contrary,  if a contract only mentions giving you  rights for England, it  doesn't cover Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland,  the Isle of Man, or the Channel Islands. 

 

Likewise, Great Britain only encompasses England, Wales, and Scotland. 

 

 

Edited by Ronaldo47
typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, cuthound said:

Photo showing how smoothly the transition from driving on the left to the right went in Stockholm on 3rd September 1967. 🤣

Kungsgatan_1967.jpg

 

Reminds me of the apocryphal tale of when Dublin decided on an experiment, and made all the cars drive on the right for a month.

 

The plan was, if it was a success, they'd make the buses and lorries drive on the right too. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember our paper showing photos of the changeover, but theirs didn't depict disorder.  It mentioned the last running of the trams and the first runs of their British-built bus replacements. I guess that solved the problem of having to re-jig the tram routes' points in the road and switches in the overhead wiring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/03/2022 at 10:48, Scholar Gypsy said:

 

And there's a short stretch in Cambridge where you drive on the left.  This is to allow racing eights to take the inside of this bend while rowing upstream. You can just see the keep left sign, which appears to be sprouting out of my chimney!


dsc_6130.jpg?w=1024

 

Would you keep left if you were going the other way ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Scholar Gypsy said:

Yes.  When boats cross over here the ones going upstream have priority over those going downstream - again the opposite to the usual situation!

I thought the boats going the other way would be keeping right ?

 

 

 

  • Happy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.