cuthound Posted October 15, 2021 Report Share Posted October 15, 2021 On 13/10/2021 at 10:52, MtB said: I sometimes I suspect Pareto had it wrong where unreasonable issues raised by The Awkward Squad are concerned. My suspicion is 99.9% of these come from 0.1% of boaters. There always has to be an exception to every rule. The above proves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtB Posted October 15, 2021 Report Share Posted October 15, 2021 27 minutes ago, cuthound said: There always has to be an exception to every rule. The above proves it. I don't follow the logic. WHY does every rule have to have an exception? Surely a rule without any exceptions is more true than one with an exception. An exception illustrates a rule is NOT universal, surely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBiscuits Posted October 15, 2021 Report Share Posted October 15, 2021 Just now, MtB said: I don't follow the logic. WHY does every rule have to have an exception? Everybody except you follows the logic - you're obviously the exception that proves the rule ... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Marshall Posted October 15, 2021 Report Share Posted October 15, 2021 1 hour ago, MtB said: I don't follow the logic. WHY does every rule have to have an exception? Surely a rule without any exceptions is more true than one with an exception. An exception illustrates a rule is NOT universal, surely? If it has an exception, it aint a rule, it's a guideline. If my ruler says something's a foot long, there is rarely a time it's eight foot six. If the speed limit's seventy, arguing that you can do a hundred and ten because you're just proving the rule may not go down that well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Nibble Posted October 15, 2021 Report Share Posted October 15, 2021 3 hours ago, Arthur Marshall said: If it has an exception, it aint a rule, it's a guideline. If my ruler says something's a foot long, there is rarely a time it's eight foot six. If the speed limit's seventy, arguing that you can do a hundred and ten because you're just proving the rule may not go down that well. This is another one like "things are never quite what they seem" where in fact, things are usually exactly what they seem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now