Jump to content

Diesel Resistant Sealant


pearley

Featured Posts

3 minutes ago, MtB said:

I don't see how water getting in under the flange could enter the diesel tank anyway. It would run down the outside of the filler tube and end up in the bilge.

 

I think it's getting in some other way.

I bet the filler tube just hangs down inside the tank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, MtB said:

I don't see how water getting in under the flange could enter the diesel tank anyway. It would run down the outside of the filler tube and end up in the bilge.

 

I think it's getting in some other way.

 

7 minutes ago, ditchcrawler said:

I bet the filler tube just hangs down inside the tank

The filler tube is a 2 inch steel pipe welded to the tank and the underside of the gunnel. The chrome filler just sits inside that steel tube. 

There is water laying at the elbow where the steel pipe goes across to the tank, veryfied by water finding paste in the end of a dipstick.

I don't know what I'm going to find when I remove the filler but want to be prepared.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ditchcrawler said:

I bet the filler tube just hangs down inside the tank

This. Is the most likely scenario.

 

We had a new Aintree in last year Pete, and the top of the rudder shaft hadnt been welded to the upper deck underneath where the bearing sits. This meant that every time the rudder was at an angle, water forced up the tube(fairly normal) entered the diesel tank.

The only way we proves this to Aintree was forcing compressed air down the filler, blocking the vent, and watching large bubbles come out from underneath the uxter plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, matty40s said:

This. Is the most likely scenario.

 

We had a new Aintree in last year Pete, and the top of the rudder shaft hadnt been welded to the upper deck underneath where the bearing sits. This meant that every time the rudder was at an angle, water forced up the tube(fairly normal) entered the diesel tank.

The only way we proves this to Aintree was forcing compressed air down the filler, blocking the vent, and watching large bubbles come out from underneath the uxter plate.

Seen exactly the same lack of weld on a Collinwood shell. I wonder why!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Tracy D'arth said:

Seen exactly the same lack of weld on a Collinwood shell. I wonder why!

Well, Aintree assured the boat buyer that they had sacked the welder after days of denying there was a problem.

It was only after being questioned on who had signed off the tank pressure tests that an admission came forth.

Perhaps he went a couple of miles up the road and got a job at the other Liverpool boat builder.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, matty40s said:

Well, Aintree assured the boat buyer that they had sacked the welder after days of denying there was a problem.

It was only after being questioned on who had signed off the tank pressure tests that an admission came forth.

Perhaps he went a couple of miles up the road and got a job at the other Liverpool boat builder.

 

 

 

In the light of this I suspect a lot more might come to light if you had a policy of informally pressure testing every Aintree and Collingwood boat diesel tank that came in to your yard Matty. Aintree and Collingwood need to look at their quality control and inspection procedures.  Responding by saying they have "sacked the welder" as the solution suggests a very poor management culture and attitude. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MtB said:

 

In the light of this I suspect a lot more might come to light if you had a policy of informally pressure testing every Aintree and Collingwood boat diesel tank that came in to your yard Matty. Aintree and Collingwood need to look at their quality control and inspection procedures.  Responding by saying they have "sacked the welder" as the solution suggests a very poor management culture and attitude. 

 

 

 

When I was working for a company building data centres, which are mainly American owned, the clients would often insist on a very public sacking of those who made (in the eyes of the client) serious errors. These people were usually highly skilled and difficult to find replacements for.

 

In many cases these people were publicly sacked and as they went out of the gates they received a call saying that they were not really sacked and to report to another site and never work on a job for that client again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cuthound said:

 

When I was working for a company building data centres, which are mainly American owned, the clients would often insist on a very public sacking of those who made (in the eyes of the client) serious errors. These people were usually highly skilled and difficult to find replacements for.

 

In many cases these people were publicly sacked and as they went out of the gates they received a call saying that they were not really sacked and to report to another site and never work on a job for that client again. 


Good point. A company i once worked for would glibly tell any customer with a complaint, that the person responsible “no longer worked for the company”, when this was a total lie. It was their ‘go to’ method of fielding complaints (lots of them), and at the same time protecting the employee from any further contact from the aggrieved customer. I guess i’m wondering if this might be what happens at the shell builders. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, MtB said:


Good point. A company i once worked for would glibly tell any customer with a complaint, that the person responsible “no longer worked for the company”, when this was a total lie. It was their ‘go to’ method of fielding complaints (lots of them), and at the same time protecting the employee from any further contact from the aggrieved customer. I guess i’m wondering if this might be what happens at the shell builders. 

 

Sacking and recruiting skilled staff must be an expensive business so I propose that every company should employ a person with a job title like "scapegoat" who could be easily sacked. To avoid redundancy pay and tribunals etc these people could be supplied by an agency and so could be instantly redeployed to a new company following their sacking. Do you think setting up a scapegoat agency could be a good earner ? 😀

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, dmr said:

 

Sacking and recruiting skilled staff must be an expensive business so I propose that every company should employ a person with a job title like "scapegoat" who could be easily sacked. To avoid redundancy pay and tribunals etc these people could be supplied by an agency and so could be instantly redeployed to a new company following their sacking. Do you think setting up a scapegoat agency could be a good earner ? 😀

 

I prefer the term "escape goat". Which is actually a thing called an "egg corn". An egg corn is a word or term incorrectly substituting the original, whilst sounding similar and at the same time, offering up a similar but slightly different and often amusing interpretation. Here are some of my faves:

 

Escape goat (scapegoat)

Damp squid (damp squib)

Globe plugs (glow plugs)

Social leopard (social leper)

Old timers disease (Alzheimer's disease)

Aqua duck (aquaduct)

 

Anyway back on topic, yes an escape ghost agency sounds an excellent eye deer. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.