magpie patrick Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 (edited) One of my colleagues, Tamarisk, has found this whilst researching the Stockport Branch of the Ashton Canal - it's on the Stockport Borough Council image archive website. I'm pretty certain it's not in Stockport though - I have a few ideas, but I don't want to cloud anyone's thinking so I'll put it here and see what you think Edited because of a record number of spelling mistakes for such a short post Edited May 18, 2021 by magpie patrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray T Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 "Over the river Kwai?" Sorry my sense of humour, if you can call it that, got the better of me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 1 hour ago, magpie patrick said: One of my colleagues, Tamarisk, has found this whilst researching the Stockport Branch of the Ashton Canal - it's on the Stockport Borough Council image archive website. I'm pretty certain it's not in Stockport though - I have a few ideas, but I don't want to cloud anyone's thinking so I'll put it here and see what you think Edited because of a record number of spelling mistakes for such a short post The only canal that I am aware of that mark their bridges with a painted arch and an 'aiming' mark like that is the Leeds and Liverpool. However there maybe others I am not aware of. I don't think it's common though. Happy to be corrected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athy Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 13 minutes ago, The Happy Nomad said: The only canal that I am aware of that mark their bridges with a painted arch and an 'aiming' mark like that is the Leeds and Liverpool. However there maybe others I am not aware of. I don't think it's common though. Happy to be corrected Didn't the G.U., or parts of it, do a similar thing to aid night navigation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Athy said: Didn't the G.U., or parts of it, do a similar thing to aid night navigation? Possibly, that is what it was for though. The style of that bridge does lend itself to being on the L&L, but I could be miles out. Edited May 18, 2021 by The Happy Nomad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 Now I'm doubting myself as most of the images of L&L bridges I have show them with a slightly 'peaked' appearance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bizzard Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 Leckon Yangtze liver blidge, Reeds Riverpool not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NB Alnwick Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 I've just watched The Yangtze Incident - excellent film! 2 hours ago, magpie patrick said: Edited because of a record number of spelling mistakes for such a short post Clearly the Sun is over the yardarm . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Mack Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 Comparing the width of the towpath to the width of the channel would suggest this is a narrow canal, so not the L&L. If it's on the Stockport archive then it's probably fairly local, if not the specific location claimed, which would suggest perhaps the Peak Forest, Ashton, or Hollinwood Branch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie patrick Posted May 18, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 (edited) It's claimed to be Sandfold on the Stockport Branch - the problem with this is that the Stockport Branch didn't go particularly close to Sandfold and looking at the NLS website of late 19th century maps doesn't reveal a location that fits the picture. My thoughts had been L&L or Lancaster - a number of canals picked out their bridges in white but the L&L put a marker over the centre of the channel, I'm not sure others did. I agree with David Mack that the bridge looks narrow, and using Occams Razor it therefore probably is narrow so not the L&L If it's a narrow canal I think the Macc far more likely Edited to add- I'm not convinced by my own analysis though.... Edited May 18, 2021 by magpie patrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NB Alnwick Posted May 18, 2021 Report Share Posted May 18, 2021 To me it looks very familiar and as I have yet to navigate north of Fradley Junction this would suggest that it is more local to the Midlands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie patrick Posted May 19, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 19, 2021 (edited) 16 hours ago, The Happy Nomad said: Now I'm doubting myself as most of the images of L&L bridges I have show them with a slightly 'peaked' appearance. Not all of them apparently - this is bridge 62, admittedly it was built by the Lancaster Canal Co as it's between Wigan and Johnsons Hillock Edited May 19, 2021 by magpie patrick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pluto Posted May 19, 2021 Report Share Posted May 19, 2021 26 minutes ago, magpie patrick said: Not all of them apparently - this is bridge 62, admittedly it was built by the Lancaster Canal Co as it's between Wigan and Johnsons Hillock The Lancaster bridges were built to Rennie's design, and are different to those on the L&LC. Bridges on that canal vary, depending upon date, location, and contractor. The early Yorkshire bridges have a slightly curved coping and no base to the parapet. Later bridges, post 1790, tend to come to more of a point in the centre, with a definite course of stone showing the base of the parapet. Within these basic designs, the stone dressing varies depending upon the contractor. This is particularly so with post 1800 bridges, where the edge dressing and finish to the centre can be different for bridges adjacent to each other. The photos show West End and New Barn bridges between Church and Rishton. They are basically the same design, but the stonework is dressed differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartland Posted May 23, 2021 Report Share Posted May 23, 2021 Looking at the image, there are similarities with the Leeds & Liverpool. There seems to be towpath access on the left hand side, always assuming that the image is the correct way round. Is there any idea as to source and why Bridge 62 is believed to be the one ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie patrick Posted May 23, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2021 3 minutes ago, Heartland said: Is there any idea as to source and why Bridge 62 is believed to be the one ? I picked Bridge 62 as being "in the same style" rather than a candidate for being the bridge in my original photo - however the setting is remarkably similar I need to cruise the whole of the L&L sometime, just to satisfy my curiosity about that canal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pluto Posted May 23, 2021 Report Share Posted May 23, 2021 As I said in my previous post, the style of bridge on the L&LC depends upon its date of construction. The first photo is of Dowley Gap bridge, one built circa 1770, with a rounded outline and no pediment for the parapet. The next is the change-line bridge at Priestholme, dating from circa 1790, with a pointed outline and a pediment for the parapet. The final one is New Hall, Burnley, dating from the circa 1800, with a rounded top and a pediment for the parapet. There is no such thing as a standard design for L&LC bridges as that changed over time. Unfortunately, the Stockport photo is not good enough quality to show if it is a L&LC bridge, and if so which type, and thus location. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartland Posted May 24, 2021 Report Share Posted May 24, 2021 That may be the case, but how many canal company adopted the mark above the bridge arch which one post has called an aiming mark of use to boatmen to line up their craft in the flying sheep weather that can occur in parts of the Pennines. For those that do not understand what that means, I often encountered such extremes when looking at the steam specials on the Settle & Carlisle Railway in the 1980's when there were plans to close the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 24, 2021 Report Share Posted May 24, 2021 1 hour ago, Heartland said: That may be the case, but how many canal company adopted the mark above the bridge arch which one post has called an aiming mark of use to boatmen to line up their craft in the flying sheep weather that can occur in parts of the Pennines. For those that do not understand what that means, I often encountered such extremes when looking at the steam specials on the Settle & Carlisle Railway in the 1980's when there were plans to close the line. There is one bridge on the L&L with two of them. One very faded the other not so. I'm not sure why they would change the position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pluto Posted May 25, 2021 Report Share Posted May 25, 2021 A couple more L&LC bridges, this time at Halsall. Many of the bridges on this section were swing bridges when first opened in 1774, so they may have been built at different times. The Liverpool length was built by the Liverpool committee, while the Yorkshire section was by the Bradford committee, hence the different lock sizes and , perhaps, different bridges. The white edge and channel centre marks were most likely first painted in the 1870s, when the canal company took over general cargo carrying and began running flyboats day and night. You just lined up the bow cabin chimney with the channel centre mark and the boat would go through without touching. I suspect that some new marks have been painted by well-meaning people who do not understand their use, and have been put on the centre line of the bridge, rather than of the channel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tam & Di Posted May 25, 2021 Report Share Posted May 25, 2021 29 minutes ago, Pluto said: I like the seat provided so people can wait to enjoy the spectacle of those who get their line wrong ? Tam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 25, 2021 Report Share Posted May 25, 2021 Well I've been right along the L&L on Pennine waterways and can I heck locate the bridge with the two different channel centre (or what I called 'aiming') marks. Its not in any of my photos either but there is at least one such bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now