Jump to content

Packing Gland


Featured Posts

This is an old stern gear, which we had out and cleaned up.

 

Putting it back I cut three packing glands I think 5mm and wrapped around shaft - then slid stuffing box back on.

 

A few people have said to me there should be an extra packing rope sandwiched between the stuffing box where it tightens on. Is this right?

 

pic of stern gear attached

 

 

IMG_1277.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is virtually no clearance between the pusher and the body of the gland. Looks like there should be another 2 or 3 rings of packing in there. Have you got the right sized packing?

 

It should look more like this.

stern_gland.jpg

Edited by David Mack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, John Lewis said:

I put three wraps in there.. over the shaft cut individually.

 

I was trying to squeeze grease down to fill the tube but its squirting out the engine side.

That suggests the packing is not tight and the pusher has bottomed out. More packing needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, David Mack said:

That suggests the packing is not tight and the pusher has bottomed out. More packing needed.

Possibly also that the packing diameter was too small. How did you select the packing size? Did you measure the gap it was to go in?

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably best to use 8mm packing, Fitbit to size and then gently flatten with a hammer until it can slide into the gap.

Make sure you remove all the thin stuff, as if it gets trapped between the prop shaft and stern gear, could wear the prop shaft thinner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, John Lewis said:

I remember the packing I used was pretty thin stuff. I got it from a guy locally who had a roll of it, but that could have been for sea going boats. Possibly the stuff I need should be thicker?

 

The stuff I put in was only 2mm thick come to think of it but 5mm in depth to take up the gap..

2mm is way too thin. 

 

 

Edited by Flyboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 'pusher' that squeezes the packing is right up against the body of the thing, I'm sure there are proper names for them, that would usually indicate no packing, i expect the packing is too thin, has been shoved down the tube and the grease is finding the easy way out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, John Lewis said:

How long a piece do you get for £14  Look here https://www.asap-supplies.com/products/drive-force-ptfe-flax-sturntite-gland-packing-8mm-1-metre-coil-807541

 

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, John Lewis said:

Heres the stuff I had put in...

 

 

IMG_1278.JPG

looks to be about 3mm or 3.5mm thick.. 5mm Deep

I think you're confusing depth and thickness. Looking at your photo the important measurement is the 'left to right', the bit your screw has gone into. Assuming the woodscrew is 4 mm that bit of packing is around 6mm. Think polo mint  the measurement between the hole and the outside edge would , in packing terms , be described as the thickness. 

 

Just read your latest post , good.  

 

     

Edited by Slim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/04/2021 at 09:56, Alan de Enfield said:

 

Did you align the ends so that each coil was 120 degrees 'out' to the next one ?

In the video demonstration the guy cut at 90 degrees   Is this where you mean the cut to be 120 degrees?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, D Ash said:

In the video demonstration the guy cut at 90 degrees   Is this where you mean the cut to be 120 degrees?

 

I think he means each ring of packing should be twisted through 120 degrees so the joints are not all in line. A scarfed cut might be better but a 90 degree one may be cleaner and less frayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony Brooks said:

I think he means each ring of packing should be twisted through 120 degrees so the joints are not all in line. A scarfed cut might be better but a 90 degree one may be cleaner and less frayed.

Yes , I see what you mean.  Just re-read Alan's advice and that certainly seems what he is implying.

Would the "cut at +/-120 degrees" also be a good idea?  a bit like railway tracks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, D Ash said:

In the video demonstration the guy cut at 90 degrees   Is this where you mean the cut to be 120 degrees?

 

The important point is that the joint in one ring of packing should not be anywhere near the joint in the adjacent ring(s). That way if there is a gap in the joints water can't just flow straight through. Whether the ring joints are spaced at 90 or 120 degrees is less of an issue. But most glands accommodate three rings of packing, hence the suggested 120 degree spacing.

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.