Jump to content

phasing out of fossil fuels - programme


magpie patrick

Featured Posts

6 minutes ago, TheBiscuits said:

 

It never has before ... :P

 

 

True, I keep meaning to read to the end of a long thread before responding to a point in an earlier post but somehow I can't help responding immediately.

 

Well life's too short for that... ?

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, cuthound said:

 

True, I keep meaning to read to the end of a long thread before responding to a point in an earlier post but somehow I can't help responding immediately.

 

Well life's too short for that... ?

You're not alone in this - an instinctive canine response, I think. Maybe it would be good manners for others to wait a week or two before responding so we don't get caught out so much? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, mrsmelly said:

 

What he doest like is his free supply of red diesel will be gone shortly! Danny a plant mechanic says all they will do is build a compound first like they normally do bring up power for charging stations job done. The makers say it has a 5 hour hard work battery which with siiting not working is classed as a full day, it also can be charged from 110 v 230v or 415v depending what you choose determines speed of charging. No matter what dickheads like this one think or say it will happen

Edited by peterboat
  • Greenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, peterboat said:

What he doest like is his free supply of red diesel will be gone shortly! Danny a plant mechanic says all they will do is build a compound first like they normally do bring up power for charging stations job done. No matter what dickheads like this one think or say it will happen

 

He can always use a pick and shovel if he doesn't like the electric digger! :D

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tracy D'arth said:

Simple question for all the green carbon free supporters.

 

Where is all the electricity going to be generated and where from" fuel" wise?

 

Nukes and renewables, mostly wind and solar in the UK.  Hopefully a tidal barrage or two which would be expensive but make a great boating lake. :D

 

5 minutes ago, Tracy D'arth said:

Second question, where is all the copper for the distribution coming from?

 

If the scrap price gets high enough, I'll weigh in my pipes and switch to plastic ...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tracy D'arth said:

Second question, where is all the copper for the distribution coming from?

As high voltage 'leccy is only on the surface of the conductors, shaped aluminimum conductors are used as they are also weight saving.

 

The vast majority of O/H power lines and local distribution lines are Aluminimum.

Copper is only used on the 'last few metres' to the house.

 

 

Conductors | SpringerLink

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheBiscuits said:

 

Nukes and renewables, mostly wind and solar in the UK.  Hopefully a tidal barrage or two which would be expensive but make a great boating lake. :D

 

 

If the scrap price gets high enough, I'll weigh in my pipes and switch to plastic ...

 

 

So where is the oil for making plastic that is carbon free..........................?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, peterboat said:

What he doest like is his free supply of red diesel will be gone shortly! Danny a plant mechanic says all they will do is build a compound first like they normally do bring up power for charging stations job done. The makers say it has a 5 hour hard work battery which with siiting not working is classed as a full day, it also can be charged from 110 v 230v or 415v depending what you choose determines speed of charging. No matter what dickheads like this one think or say it will happen

He's also (very much) not comparing like with like

 

Electric digger plugged into a small (2kva?) transformer, long extension lead to an enormous generator running (by the sound of it) flat out.

 

Either: -

  • if it was plugged in properly It would be charged in 30 minutes
  • It would charge in the same time from a 2Kw hand carryable suitcase genny

But that doesn't suit his agenda...

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, 1st ade said:

He's also (very much) not comparing like with like

 

Electric digger plugged into a small (2kva?) transformer, long extension lead to an enormous generator running (by the sound of it) flat out.

 

Either: -

  • if it was plugged in properly It would be charged in 30 minutes
  • It would charge in the same time from a 2Kw hand carryable suitcase genny

But that doesn't suit his agenda...

Exactly, these guys want red because they run their cars on it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, cuthound said:

 

Happened in BT 20 years ago. They incorporated London Weighting into your pay. Problem was they then withheld pay rises to those previously in receipt of LW  because their pay was higher.

 

All that happened was they could no longer retain or attract staff to work in London because of the higher living costs.

 

In the case of BT, despite many efforts to raise it elsewhere, productivity was higher in London and the South East.

Perhaps because it was known that people in London got more money than those elsewhere. Where is the incentive in that for people outside London? The SE region has major problems with transport due to the distances people commute; a lack of affordable housing, which also encourages commuting; and a lack of sufficient clean water for the people who live there. All these factors need to be addressed when environmental policy is being decided, yet governments do little to encourage people to move to areas where the environmental problems are less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Pluto said:

Perhaps because it was known that people in London got more money than those elsewhere. Where is the incentive in that for people outside London? The SE region has major problems with transport due to the distances people commute; a lack of affordable housing, which also encourages commuting; and a lack of sufficient clean water for the people who live there. All these factors need to be addressed when environmental policy is being decided, yet governments do little to encourage people to move to areas where the environmental problems are less.

 

Doubtful, even when London Weighting was paid (circa £2250 before tax  IIRC), it didn't even cover the cost of the annual rail season ticket, let alone higher mortgage payments, higher Council Tax and other cost of living expenses.

 

Despite the higher wages, people living in London and the South East have much lower disposable incomes.

 

It when only after I retired and moved to the Midlands that I realised how much of a premium you have to pay to live in London andvthe South East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, peterboat said:

Recycled plastic?

 

..and plastic of vegetable origin.

 

22 hours ago, peterboat said:

What he doest like is his free supply of red diesel will be gone shortly! Danny a plant mechanic says all they will do is build a compound first like they normally do bring up power for charging stations job done. The makers say it has a 5 hour hard work battery which with siiting not working is classed as a full day, it also can be charged from 110 v 230v or 415v depending what you choose determines speed of charging. No matter what dickheads like this one think or say it will happen

 

9 hours ago, 1st ade said:

He's also (very much) not comparing like with like

 

Electric digger plugged into a small (2kva?) transformer, long extension lead to an enormous generator running (by the sound of it) flat out.

 

Either: -

  • if it was plugged in properly It would be charged in 30 minutes
  • It would charge in the same time from a 2Kw hand carryable suitcase genny

But that doesn't suit his agenda...

 

Whenever I've seen a diesel excavator being used on site, it has sat for minutes on end (sometimes hours) with its engine running, but doing no work. That doesn't happen with electric traction - stopped is stopped, full stop. Hence the five-hour working day is more than enough, and that's with today's technology.

 

 

 

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, cuthound said:

 

Doubtful, even when London Weighting was paid (circa £2250 before tax  IIRC), it didn't even cover the cost of the annual rail season ticket, let alone higher mortgage payments, higher Council Tax and other cost of living expenses.

 

Despite the higher wages, people living in London and the South East have much lower disposable incomes.

 

It when only after I retired and moved to the Midlands that I realised how much of a premium you have to pay to live in London andvthe South East.

However you dress it up in financial terms, people still see someone doing the same job for more money. You also ignore the fact that it is much cheaper to visit national collections and arts  if you live in the SE. When I was first writing my book on the history of the L&LC, I could only afford to do the research in the National Archive by sleeping on the floor of Mike Carter's caravan in Tam and Di's boatyard. When visiting London, I am always amazed at how cheap public transport is compared to Lancashire. Much more money to support public transport, per head of population, is put into London compared to elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pluto said:

However you dress it up in financial terms, people still see someone doing the same job for more money. You also ignore the fact that it is much cheaper to visit national collections and arts  if you live in the SE. When I was first writing my book on the history of the L&LC, I could only afford to do the research in the National Archive by sleeping on the floor of Mike Carter's caravan in Tam and Di's boatyard. When visiting London, I am always amazed at how cheap public transport is compared to Lancashire. Much more money to support public transport, per head of population, is put into London compared to elsewhere.

 

I'm not dressing anything up. The fact is that it costs a lot more to live in London and the southeast than anywhere else in the country and the wages reflect that. If they didn't ordinary people wouldn't be able to afford to live there.

 

I have lived in Lancashire, Surrey and Staffordshire and property in Surrey is at least three times more expensive to buy for a similar house than elsewhere, then again in the South East, people tend to commute further and by train which further ads to the cost of living.

 

I don't suppose  many people spend a percentage percentage of their disposable income visiting national collections and arts, wherever they live.

 

The reason why more money is spent on public transport in London is because more people need to use it. This has been the case since the time it was built.

 

Sounds like you resent anyone being paid more than you, even when it is obvious that the difference doesn't cover the additional cost of living.

 

 

Edited by cuthound
Clarification
  • Greenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am just trying to suggest that the amount of investment in the SE does create problems, and is probably unsustainable, given the pressures it has created on the natural environment. It also makes it difficult for people to move around between jobs as many people would think their quality of life would reduce would reduce in the SE. At the same time, the effect of those moving out of the SE, after selling a house, can result in increasing prices outside on the SE beyond what the local market can afford - just look at the lack of affordable homes in Cornwall.

 

On public transport in London, surely if many people use it, they don't need the levels of financial support currently being given. What I question is whether a society which relies upon transport so much is sustainable, given the health implications, both from exhausts, etc, and from the density of transport.

 

As to my income, it always been low as I think the benefits of interesting work far outweigh avarice, and I have been able to do things related to my interests which would have been impossible in a conventional job. For me, it is what you put back into society, rather than what you take out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/11/2020 at 15:50, peterboat said:

 and heating and cooking it will work.

Problem is that Hydrogen has about 1/3 the calorific value of Methane. So to run your boiler or cooker you're going to need a lot more gas - so you've either got to increase the pipeline pressure or the size of the pipes.

  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, StephenA said:

Problem is that Hydrogen has about 1/3 the calorific value of Methane. So to run your boiler or cooker you're going to need a lot more gas - so you've either got to increase the pipeline pressure or the size of the pipes.

I think you may have that the wrong way around

 

**Nett calorific value (in red)

 

Diesel, Propane and Butane (that we already use for cooking) are similar values to Methane (but I don't know anyone using Methane, or why you would have chosen that as your comparison)

 

 

 

Fuel Density Higher Heating Value (HHV)
(Gross Calorific Value - GCV)
Lower Heating Value (LHV)
(Net Calorific Value - NCV)
@0°C/32°F, 1 bar
Gaseous fuels [kg/m3] [g/ft3] [kWh/kg] [MJ/kg] [Btu/lb] [MJ/m3] [Btu/ft3] [kWh/kg] [MJ/kg] [Btu/lb] [MJ/m3] [Btu/ft3]
Acetylene 1.097 31.1 13.9 49.9 21453 54.7 1468          
Ammonia       22.5 9690              
Hydrogen 0.090 2.55 39.4 141.7 60920 12.7 341 33.3 120.0 51591 10.8 290
Methane 0.716 20.3 15.4 55.5 23874 39.8 1069 13.9 50.0 21496 35.8 964
Natural gas (US market)* 0.777 22.0 14.5 52.2 22446 40.6 1090 13.1 47.1 20262 36.6 983
Town gas           18.0 483          
  @15°C/60°F                    
Liquid fuels [kg/l] [kg/gal] [kWh/kg] [MJ/kg] [Btu/lb] [MJ/l] [Btu/gal] [kWh/kg] [MJ/kg] [Btu/lb] [MJ/l] [Btu/gal]
Acetone 0.787 2.979 8.83 31.8 13671 25.0 89792 8.22 29.6 12726 23.3 83580
Butane 0.601 3.065 13.64 49.1 21109 29.5 105875 12.58 45.3 19475 27.2 97681
Butanol 0.810   10.36 37.3 16036 30.2 108359 9.56 34.4 14789 27.9 99934
Diesel fuel* 0.846 3.202 12.67 45.6 19604 38.6 138412 11.83 42.6 18315 36.0 129306
Dimethyl ether (DME) 0.665 2.518 8.81 31.7 13629 21.1 75655 8.03 28.9 12425 19.2 68973
Ethane 0.572 2.165 14.42 51.9 22313 29.7 106513 13.28 47.8 20550 27.3 98098
Ethanol (100%) 0.789 2.987 8.25 29.7 12769 23.4 84076 7.42 26.7 11479 21.1 75583
Diethyl ether (ether) 0.716 2.710 11.94 43.0 18487 30.8 110464          
Gasoline (petrol)* 0.737 2.790 12.89 46.4 19948 34.2 122694 12.06 43.4 18659 32.0 114761
Gas oil (heating oil)* 0.84 3.180 11.95 43.0 18495 36.1 129654 11.89 42.8 18401 36.0 128991
Glycerin 1.263 4.781 5.28 19.0 8169 24.0 86098          
Heavy fuel oil* 0.98 3.710 11.61 41.8 17971 41.0 146974 10.83 39.0 16767 38.2 137129
Kerosene* 0.821 3.108 12.83 46.2 19862 37.9 126663 11.94 43.0 18487 35.3 126663
Light fuel oil* 0.96 3.634 12.22 44.0 18917 42.2 151552 11.28 40.6 17455 39.0 139841
LNG* 0.428 1.621 15.33 55.2 23732 23.6 84810 13.50 48.6 20894 20.8 74670
LPG* 0.537 2.033 13.69 49.3 21195 26.5 94986 12.64 45.5 19561 24.4 87664
Marine gas oil* 0.855 3.237 12.75 45.9 19733 39.2 140804 11.89 42.8 18401 36.6 131295
Methanol 0.791 2.994 6.39 23.0 9888 18.2 65274 5.54 19.9 8568 15.8 56562
Methyl ester (biodiesel) 0.888 3.361 11.17 40.2 17283 35.7 128062 10.42 37.5 16122 33.3 119460
MTBE 0.743 2.811 10.56 38.0 16337 28.2 101244 9.75 35.1 15090 26.1 93517
Oils vegetable (biodiesel)* 0.92 3.483 11.25 40.5 17412 37.3 133684 10.50 37.8 16251 34.8 124772
Paraffin (wax)* 0.90 3.407 12.78 46.0 19776 41.4 148538 11.53 41.5 17842 37.4 134007
Pentane 0.63 2.385 13.50 48.6 20894 30.6 109854 12.60 45.4 19497 28.6 102507
Petroleum naphtha* 0.725 2.745 13.36 48.1 20679 34.9 125145 12.47 44.9 19303 32.6 116819
Propane 0.498 1.885 13.99 50.4 21647 25.1 89963 12.88 46.4 19927 23.1 82816
Residual oil* 0.991 3.752       41.8 150072 10.97 39.5 16982 39.2 140470
Tar*     10.00 36.0 15477              
Turpentine 0.865 3.274 12.22 44.0 18917 38.1 136555          
Solid fuels*     [kWh/kg] [MJ/kg] [Btu/lb]     [kWh/kg] [MJ/kg] [Btu/lb]    
Anthracite coal     9.06 32.6 14015              
Bituminous coal     8.39 30.2 12984     8.06 29.0 12468    
Carbon     9.11 32.8 14101              
Charcoal     8.22 29.6 12726     7.89 28.4 12210    
Coke     7.22 26.0 11178              
Lignite (brown coal)     3.89 14.0 6019              
Peat     4.72 17.0 7309              
Petroleum coke     8.69 31.3 13457     8.19 29.5 12683    
Semi anthracite     8.19 29.5 12683              
Sub-Bituminous coal     6.78 24.4 10490              
Sulfur (s)     2.56 9.2 3955     2.55 9.2 3939    
Wood (dry) 0.701   4.50 16.2 6965     4.28 15.4 6621  
Edited by Alan de Enfield
  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/11/2020 at 12:45, peterboat said:

Generalisations I know  or i mentioned the plant fitter didn't i...........?

We sold a Citroen visa diesel back in the 80s through exchange and mart. The ‘road making ‘ purchaser who hailed from an Emerald Isle not too far away couldn’t give a stuff about it being rusty ex driving school or anything else. He just wanted to know if it could be driven’ on the red’. I delivered it to him in Sandwell, picked up the cash, and jumped on my bike to ride back to Brinklow. He didn’t even get in it. Tax tick, mot tick, on the red ,tick.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.