Jump to content

curious if anyone can give me any more information on my project for the past 3 years


baileymay43

Featured Posts

Evening all, I've been trying to find information and history on my lovely barge that I've been working on for the past 3 years. I've inevitably had lots of towpath opinions however these vary quite dramatically. Im curious to see if theres anyone on here that has any solid knowledge of approximate build years, area and purpose of build, any solid information at all really. Please only chip in if you're absolutely sure, everyone i meet seems to guess and sends me down the wrong path!

Screenshot_20201010-223205.jpg

Screenshot_20200918-121604.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did EC Jones have riveting equipment? 

 

I usually associate them with welding. Bantam push tugs and their narrow boats were welded. 

 

I reckon that particular boat could be Thames conservancy but no particular reason to think so. 

Edited by magnetman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I saw a couple of areas  of riveting. 
I imagine they would have riveting equipment given they were a fairly big establishment.

It was a  guess no more. It would help if we knew the size.

Certainly when we were in London in the early 80s there were lots of hoppers and barges of that type at Brentford. Mostly derelict but some in use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was interested by the flat ends. 

 

A bit like the river Wey barges but not the same. 

 

I was not around on the cut until the mid nineties due to age issues so I am always happy to be corrected on these things.

 

I think Tam Murrell @Tam & Di  may have some knowledge here.

 

ETA the light blue paint on the bollards is an indicator me thinks. 

 

I reckon Thames conservancy used light blue and bw used dark blue. 

Edited by magnetman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks to be intended for shifting using a push tug, so possibly a work-boat rather than towed as part of a train as was the case on the Lea up to the 1970s.  But aren't mud hoppers mostly double-skinned? 

Edited by Tacet
Typo mentioned by Bizzard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some points I notice immediately are that although it seems to have watertight sections fore and aft it is not hoppered - the sides are vulnerable to any grab. It has very odd collection of bollards either end. It has a transom stern (assuming that the far end is rather more rounded) and no apparent rudder or provision for a tiller. It is a mixture of welded and rivetted construction as mentioned, and has a slight angled chine.

It has possibly been lengthened or shortened at some point - something slightly strange happens where the chequer plate side decks meet the stern section - there's a butt joint in the coaming too.

It seems to be somewhere that maintenance craft are laid up, but it would give a clue to know where it is and the size.

I'm not sure that Today is going to be a Good Day, but I can only hope.

I'll give it some thought.

 

Tam

 

p.s. my typing overlapped with Tacet's points, which are similar to what I noted.

Edited by Tam & Di
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tacet said:

It looks to be intended for shifting using a push tug, so possibly a wok-boat rather than towed as part of a train as was the case on the Lea up to the 1970s.  But aren't mud hoppers mostly double-skinned? 

But surely a wok boat would be round in shape :)

Edited by bizzard
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tam & Di said:

Some points I notice immediately are that although it seems to have watertight sections fore and aft it is not hoppered - the sides are vulnerable to any grab. It has very odd collection of bollards either end. It has a transom stern (assuming that the far end is rather more rounded) and no apparent rudder or provision for a tiller.

When towed by a tug in a long train, the barges with tillers had one steerer per vessel, as you might expect.  But, less expectedly all the steerers could be in the wheelhouse of the tug playing cards.  The tail of the train swung wildly - almost bank-to-bank which made it very exciting when you met one.  Even the skippper of the tug looked alarmed and he had a lot less to fear than you.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Athy said:

Perhaps the boat's name 'Baileymay 43' is a clue.

Perhaps you are having a little joke with us.

If it is 43' long that must be for some particular reason; it's a strange length but nothing comes immediately to mind, and the rather cruder boat alongside looks to be even shorter.

 

Tam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

both ends of the boat are identical. never been extended. never been powered or used with a tiller. its all riveted with some overplating in places mainly due to grab damage. baseplate is still a strong 8mm again all riveted. sides are 3mm im assuming due to the difficulty of rolling the hard iron. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.