Help - survey returned

[David Mack]

Unless the shell is self-built, as well as the fitout.  Unlikely, perhaps, but possible.

[WotEver]

2 minutes ago, matty40s said:

It would have needed a HIN if sold after 2001, even if it was a shell.

Indeed

[Alan de Enfield]

1 minute ago, WotEver said:

Yes it should have a HIN somewhere (or rather, two somewheres) but the hypothetical self-builder could have thrown the Annexe 3 in the bin because he never intended to spend the money on RCD paperwork. It’s more than 5 years ago so perfectly legal to sell. Of course since 2017 hull builders don’t supply an Annexe 3 for a sailaway anyway. 

 

Indeed - there is now no Annexe III, even an empty shell must be provided with full RCD documentation as if it was a completed boat.

[ditchcrawler]

Lets hope the OP comes back with more info

[WotEver]

3 minutes ago, Alan de Enfield said:

 

Indeed - there is now no Annexe III, even an empty shell must be provided with full RCD documentation as if it was a completed boat.

The arguments in favour of that change are, in fairness, pretty solid. 

[LadyG]

7 hours ago, blackrose said:

 

Have you thought about masking off the motor, etc, and sprayfoaming the BT tunnel (and also walls/top of the compartment if required)? 

 

That's what I did on mine 15 years ago and I had no more condensation issues.

Why on earth would a purchaser do these things especially when he is not an experienced boater, I would walk a way, citing these valid reasons, broker will then tell you he will sort it, and he misunderstood, etc etc, get him to do the jobs, then tell him your surveyor will come and survey in ten days, expect to see the cat fur fly and the pigeon feathers.

You are seen as a soft target, keep your cool, tell them you are viewing other boats. TOUGHEN UP!Do you really think they have a queue of punters wanting these mooring. I don't. 

Edited September 24, 2020 by LadyG

[WotEver]

14 minutes ago, LadyG said:

Why on earth would a purchaser do these things...

??? @blackrose wasn’t talking to a new purchaser, he was talking to @cuthound

[blackrose]

4 hours ago, Alan de Enfield said:

 

Indeed - there is now no Annexe III, even an empty shell must be provided with full RCD documentation as if it was a completed boat.

But I thought this was a 2013 boat? Why are we talking about post-2017 regs?

3 hours ago, LadyG said:

Why on earth would a purchaser do these things especially when he is not an experienced boater, 

 

What on earth are you talking about? You need to read the thread properly before responding.

[WotEver]

3 hours ago, blackrose said:

But I thought this was a 2013 boat? Why are we talking about post-2017 regs?

Thread drift. In exactly the same manner as how you ended up talking to Cuthound about spray foam, which confused the above poster. 

Edited September 25, 2020 by WotEver

[cuthound]

53 minutes ago, WotEver said:

Thread drift. In exactly the same manner as how you ended up talking to Cuthound about spray foam, which confused the above poster. 

 

Easily done ??

[Alan de Enfield]

5 hours ago, blackrose said:

But I thought this was a 2013 boat? Why are we talking about post-2017 regs?

It was as a result of the OP saying that a 2013 boat did not have a HIN number (which unless it was a total DIY build including welding up the hull) it must have)