PNB116 Posted May 29, 2020 Report Share Posted May 29, 2020 Hi all, does anyone have an idea of what I might have to pay for an Alde central heating boiler removed from my boat? By a gas certified engineer of course! many thanks in advance Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Mack Posted May 29, 2020 Report Share Posted May 29, 2020 Or just get a certified gas bod to disconnect the gas and cap off the pipe. Anyone can remove the boiler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotEver Posted May 29, 2020 Report Share Posted May 29, 2020 Just now, David Mack said: Or just get a certified gas bod to disconnect the gas and cap off the pipe. Anyone can remove the boiler. I think that for BSS compliance they'd have to remove the entire branch to the boiler, not simply cap it off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Mack Posted May 29, 2020 Report Share Posted May 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, WotEver said: I think that for BSS compliance they'd have to remove the entire branch to the boiler, not simply cap it off. Yes. Cap off where the Alde feed branches off the rest of the gas pipework. Anyone can then remove the redundant branch pipe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotEver Posted May 29, 2020 Report Share Posted May 29, 2020 Just now, David Mack said: Yes. Cap off where the Alde feed branches off the rest of the gas pipework. Strictly speaking, that's not compliant either as it results in an 'unnecessary connection' in the pipe. Depending on the layout it might have to be re-piped from the gas locker bulkhead to the first device. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reg Posted May 31, 2020 Report Share Posted May 31, 2020 On 29/05/2020 at 10:01, WotEver said: Strictly speaking, that's not compliant either as it results in an 'unnecessary connection' in the pipe. Depending on the layout it might have to be re-piped from the gas locker bulkhead to the first device. I removed my alde which had the effect of reducing multiple connections down to one thereby overall making a safer pipe run . This was viewed pragmatically and did not affect the certification. It could also be argued that the connection was a neccesary connection in that it was there ready for a future reinstating of a boiler system. I think only a truly pedantic inspector would fail a connection that was multiple times safer than that which it replaced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotEver Posted May 31, 2020 Report Share Posted May 31, 2020 43 minutes ago, reg said: I think only a truly pedantic inspector would fail a connection that was multiple times safer than that which it replaced. On that we are agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jen-in-Wellies Posted May 31, 2020 Report Share Posted May 31, 2020 52 minutes ago, reg said: I think only a truly pedantic inspector would fail a connection that was multiple times safer than that which it replaced. So it is definitely going to fail then! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix_V Posted May 31, 2020 Report Share Posted May 31, 2020 ask him to put a test point in the redundant pipe no one can argue against that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reg Posted June 1, 2020 Report Share Posted June 1, 2020 8 hours ago, Phoenix_V said: ask him to put a test point in the redundant pipe no one can argue against that That's what I did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now