Sir Nibble 1365 Report post #1 Posted Tuesday at 20:08 Bored, so I thought I would start a fun what if. Scenario. We, us, CWDF have dug a canal. It's just over a hundred miles long with forty two (😁) locks twelve of which are in a single flight. It has a navigable width of twenty five feet and fourteen by seventy two foot locks. It passes through both urban and rural areas with "heritage" all over the place. It connects to a navigable CaRT river at each end. Water abstraction for the summit pound is agreed but pumps not yet installed. Having dug it, we have to bring it into use. We are the steering committee. Proposals? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alan de Enfield 4379 Report post #2 Posted Tuesday at 20:20 10 minutes ago, Sir Nibble said: Having dug it, we have to bring it into use. We are the steering committee. Proposals? We need to decide on the minimum water depth / boat draft allowed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Dreamer 58 Report post #3 Posted Tuesday at 20:20 Have we got an aqueduct? We need an aqueduct. If we have an aqueduct, particularly if it is long and high, we can light it up at night, and all the people we want to bring their boats to see it. Of course, we need lots of boats, because as the nice people at ANT will attest, trying to run a comparatively short stretch of navigation, whilst maintaining our independence, means we will have to charge an extraordinarily high licence fee! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Nibble 1365 Report post #4 Posted Tuesday at 20:26 2 minutes ago, The Dreamer said: Have we got an aqueduct? We need an aqueduct. If we have an aqueduct, particularly if it is long and high, we can light it up at night, and all the people we want to bring their boats to see it. Of course, we need lots of boats, because as the nice people at ANT will attest, trying to run a comparatively short stretch of navigation, whilst maintaining our independence, means we will have to charge an extraordinarily high licence fee! Of course we need boats, we wouldn't have dug it otherwise. Unfortunately no aqueduct but it does pass through a lovely piece of natural woodland we could light up if we want a Walt Disney canal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonesthenuke 49 Report post #5 Posted Tuesday at 20:26 You need an expensive medal and advertising campaign to attract cyclists, runners and fishermen to spoil the experience of the boating community? (Now ducking and hiding). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Dreamer 58 Report post #6 Posted Tuesday at 20:34 4 minutes ago, Sir Nibble said: Walt Disney canal. Na, don’t want a Disney canal, we would have to add coconut essence to the water, and play an eternal loop of “It’s a Small World”. note: I am now aware that the whole of CWDF will be humming the aforementioned ear worm... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Nibble 1365 Report post #7 Posted Tuesday at 20:37 Nope, never heard it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheBiscuits 1745 Report post #8 Posted Tuesday at 20:39 27 minutes ago, Sir Nibble said: Bored, so I thought I would start a fun what if. Scenario. We, us, CWDF have dug a canal. It's just over a hundred miles long with forty two (😁) locks twelve of which are in a single flight. It has a navigable width of twenty five feet and fourteen by seventy two foot locks. It passes through both urban and rural areas with "heritage" all over the place. It connects to a navigable CaRT river at each end. Water abstraction for the summit pound is agreed but pumps not yet installed. Having dug it, we have to bring it into use. We are the steering committee. Proposals? Lack of ambition I fear. We should do the 300-foot canal! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Contour_Canal Our (probably) next Prime Minister was spouting on about supporting it a few years ago - he seems to have gone quiet on the topic since he got into a position he could actually make it happen! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
system 4-50 855 Report post #9 Posted Tuesday at 21:16 Does it pass through London or does it pass through London? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jerra 1689 Report post #10 Posted Tuesday at 21:19 58 minutes ago, Alan de Enfield said: We need to decide on the minimum water depth / boat draft allowed. I would also want to set the maximum beam allowed. 14' locks and 25' canal width. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheBiscuits 1745 Report post #11 Posted Tuesday at 22:59 1 hour ago, Jerra said: I would also want to set the maximum beam allowed. 14' locks and 25' canal width. I would think that room for two 14' boats to pass each other would help ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
restlessnomad 85 Report post #12 Posted Tuesday at 23:02 We need canal builder tycoon sim game... or for my left leaning friends... canal minister 2020 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alan de Enfield 4379 Report post #13 Posted Tuesday at 23:04 1 minute ago, restlessnomad said: We need canal builder tycoon sim game... or for my left leaning friends... canal minister 2020 You don't mean the NCCC do you ? (National Corbyn Canal Co). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
restlessnomad 85 Report post #14 Posted Tuesday at 23:16 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Alan de Enfield said: You don't mean the NCCC do you ? (National Corbyn Canal Co). only a bourgeoisie will have such impure thought, the canal company will be called 'national united canal of the proletariat' Edited Tuesday at 23:19 by restlessnomad 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
doratheexplorer 612 Report post #15 Posted Wednesday at 07:34 11 hours ago, Sir Nibble said: Bored, so I thought I would start a fun what if. Scenario. We, us, CWDF have dug a canal. It's just over a hundred miles long with forty two (😁) locks twelve of which are in a single flight. It has a navigable width of twenty five feet and fourteen by seventy two foot locks. It passes through both urban and rural areas with "heritage" all over the place. It connects to a navigable CaRT river at each end. Water abstraction for the summit pound is agreed but pumps not yet installed. Having dug it, we have to bring it into use. We are the steering committee. Proposals? Reduce the lock width to a sensible 7' 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Athy 901 Report post #16 Posted Wednesday at 07:37 The talk so far has centred upon geographical and physical features. How about people? Such a canal would need lengthsmen and other competent staff to ensure smooth running and prompt, professional repair to any damage or malfunction, and to ensure a consistently navigable depth. Incidentally, Snibs, is this waterway a total figment of your imagination or is it based upon a real one? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rusty69 3577 Report post #17 Posted Wednesday at 08:08 11 hours ago, Sir Nibble said: Proposals I read it as "Let's ruin a canal" 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alan de Enfield 4379 Report post #18 Posted Wednesday at 08:11 1 minute ago, rusty69 said: I read it as "Let's ruin a canal" In which case, hand it over to a "Well Being Charity", it could be a Trust who are responsible for Canals & Rivers 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
magpie patrick 273 Report post #19 Posted Wednesday at 08:59 We need a parakeet reserve, a sensory towpath, an outdoor gym, a cycle track, and a space for meditation. The newts need somewhere to live, and the water voles. The forty-two locks could be a focus for poetry and meditation... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
system 4-50 855 Report post #20 Posted Wednesday at 09:27 vertiginous green object. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
roland elsdon 596 Report post #21 Posted Wednesday at 09:48 First thing you need is a committee to create signs. They should come from an industry with no knowledge of law, engineering, environment or common sense. The signs need to be welcoming and inclusive, gender neutral and non threatening. Ideally they should be sign only so as not to offend the illiterate or those for whom English is not a first language. Right thats the easy bit next 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LadyG 434 Report post #22 Posted Wednesday at 09:52 (edited) 14 hours ago, Sir Nibble said: Of course we need boats, we wouldn't have dug it otherwise. Unfortunately no aqueduct but it does pass through a lovely piece of natural woodland we could light up if we want a Walt Disney canal. Sorry, that is light pollution, we need to ban modern ideas like that. I need a budgie budget. Cost per lifting bridge, also a caisson as per Falkirk. KELPIES, LOTS OF ART, iron horseshoe men in water. Anchor practicing by artificial weir. Welly Boot Throwing and Beer Festival Weekend test test2 ,,,,3 Edited Wednesday at 10:28 by LadyG -------- Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Nibble 1365 Report post #23 Posted Wednesday at 10:10 2 hours ago, Athy said: The talk so far has centred upon geographical and physical features. How about people? Such a canal would need lengthsmen and other competent staff to ensure smooth running and prompt, professional repair to any damage or malfunction, and to ensure a consistently navigable depth. Incidentally, Snibs, is this waterway a total figment of your imagination or is it based upon a real one? Completely imaginary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LadyG 434 Report post #24 Posted Wednesday at 10:29 testing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom Morgan 33 Report post #25 Posted Wednesday at 10:42 No leather hats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites