Jump to content

Another canal side property for sale


emm

Featured Posts

  • 1 month later...

That ticks many boxes, it's well appointed, reasonably priced and the secluded mooring (if granted by CART) is very appealing. It does appear to lack proper fireplaces, which would put us off it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Athy said:

That ticks many boxes, it's well appointed, reasonably priced and the secluded mooring (if granted by CART) is very appealing. It does appear to lack proper fireplaces, which would put us off it.

 

But surely if you own that arm you wouldnt need any permission from crt? As you would for an EOG mooring alongside one of their waterways? Or maybe they could invoke something about access to their waterway from your own private arm?

 

Nigel Moore would have known I'm sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Happy Nomad said:

 

 

Nigel Moore would have known I'm sure.

Yes, he would. He is much missed.

 

Although the arm is described as "private", there's no indication that it belongs to that house. Indeed, as "consents and investigations" would be required before mooring there, probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Athy said:

Yes, he would. He is much missed.

 

Although the arm is described as "private", there's no indication that it belongs to that house. Indeed, as "consents and investigations" would be required before mooring there, probably not.

 

One of the pictures clearly shows the arm is enclosed within the property boundry. The blue boat already moored to next door looks as if it is moored with permission of the actual owner. 

 

 

Screenshot_20210325-100329_Rightmove.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Athy said:

Yes, he would. He is much missed.

 

Although the arm is described as "private", there's no indication that it belongs to that house. Indeed, as "consents and investigations" would be required before mooring there, probably not.

you could wake up one morning to find a bunch of CRT workboats orange-baling-twined to your garden and trees

 

wonder if the original owner, who only recently had this built, looked into it and got knocked back hence the sale ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Happy Nomad said:

Google earth still shows what looks like some sort of redundant industrial unit on that site which perhaps the arm was built to serve,

I imagine that it would have been a factory arm of some kind, yes. All credit to whoever decided to retain it rather than filling it in.

 

Someone on here will know about old canal arms in the Kidderminster area!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually, now looking at google earth it looks like it was parcelled with the house on the end with the blue boat, possibly one of these occasions where they’ve sold off the large garden as a building plot to make a few quid and cut back on the gardening :) 

it’s certainly very interesting, not Edwardian/Victorian enough for us though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The arm was the Mitton railway basin, the only railway / canal interchange on the main line of the Staffs/Worcs Canal.

Most of the traffic was steel from South Wales for the Wilden and Stourvale works and coal from Highley Colliery.

 

 

Opera Snapshot_2021-03-25_102215_maps.nls.uk.jpg

Edited by Dorlan
  • Greenie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Happy Nomad said:

Canal Plan refers to it as 'Railway Interchange Basin'.

 

It also clarifies the purpose of the large brick structure in the garden of the other house at the canal side. It was apparently to prevent any wagons that over ran the buffers form running into the canal.

 

https://canalplan.org.uk/place/nf1j

Crude, but probably very effective.

3 minutes ago, Jonkx said:

This is fascinating. So the question is, if you bought the house do you get the arm, and rights to moor any boats there?

I suspect that a) no, b) yes - subject to permission from whoever owns the arm (would it be CART?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But would it not belong to you, as per the red line on the plan, so you could do whatever within reason you wanted in it? Or is that red line not the property ownership? Unless there's some sort of deed or agreement between CRT and the arm owner? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jonkx said:

This is fascinating. So the question is, if you bought the house do you get the arm, and rights to moor any boats there?

 

There is a caveat in the listing about mooring being subject to 'further investigations and registrations' or some such.

 

It would be interesting to see the plot on the land registry to see if the plot really does include the arm as per the advert. That I guess would be the starting point and determine what if any approval is needed form the navigation authority ie CRT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jonkx said:

This is fascinating. So the question is, if you bought the house do you get the arm, and rights to moor any boats there?

The red line boundary on the plan should define the boundary so, yes, you would own the arm.  But as the arm receives its water from the CRT canal, they would still retain rights over the water.  Mooring boats (plural) there could be a problem as it would likely require planning permission and the Conservation Area restrictions could make things tricky.

 

Another interesting question would be:  If the red line boundary is correct, and you moored your boat there; would you need a CRT licence?

Edited by doratheexplorer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.