Jump to content

Brentford Possible Blockage


mark99

Featured Posts

From that link... That still doesn't fully explain it. So he is in the lock with his arms down the weed hatch. The lock slowly fills. That wont sink the boat.

 

 

"The boat owner was there (in the hi-viz) and we asked what had happened ...  from what I could gather his tiller arm had been knocked out of its skeg when the tide was apparently too low whilst waiting at Thames Lock (so he's come off the tide today).  He thought he'd fixed it but on the way to Clitheroes Lock realised that it was still not fully in.  He decided to go into the lock, close the tail gate, open his weed hatch to try to relocate the tiller arm.  Unnoticed by him was that the upper gates were very leaky and of course the water level rose, his boat moved forward and his bow caught on the cill, and the boat sank. ??? Very, very puzzling ???"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WJM said:

From that link... That still doesn't fully explain it. So he is in the lock with his arms down the weed hatch. The lock slowly fills. That wont sink the boat.

 

 

"The boat owner was there (in the hi-viz) and we asked what had happened ...  from what I could gather his tiller arm had been knocked out of its skeg when the tide was apparently too low whilst waiting at Thames Lock (so he's come off the tide today).  He thought he'd fixed it but on the way to Clitheroes Lock realised that it was still not fully in.  He decided to go into the lock, close the tail gate, open his weed hatch to try to relocate the tiller arm.  Unnoticed by him was that the upper gates were very leaky and of course the water level rose, his boat moved forward and his bow caught on the cill, and the boat sank. ??? Very, very puzzling ???"

It sort of does.

 

The owner needed to reseat his rudder in the cup on the skeg. 

He put the boat into the lock and closed the gates, but didn't draw the paddles

While he was working on the rudder, the boat drifted forwards

Leakage meant the lock was filling*

The pulpit rail caught under the gates while the owner was concentrating on the rudder**

The pulpit rail eventually pushed the bow under far enough for water to flood the front deck via the drain holes

 

*This is the bit that doesn't ring true. It must be a huge leak

**It's a bloody frustrating and tiring job. I can imagine losing concentration on anything else while doing this

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RLWP said:

Leakage meant the lock was filling*

 

*This is the bit that doesn't ring true. It must be a huge leak

 

I disagree,

 

Some Southern GU locks can self fill very quickly indeed.

Apart from anything else, don't forget they have no bye wash, but are instead designed that excess water in the pound above flows through the sluices for the ground paddles, so if bottom gates are shut and paddles down the lock will fill.

I have no idea if that was happening at this lock at the time, but when it does a lock can "self fill" in minutes.  This happens down Buckby when the back-pumps are left pumping far too much water back up, and it has to overflow to somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RLWP said:

The owner needed to reseat his rudder in the cup on the skeg. 

He put the boat into the lock and closed the gates, but didn't draw the paddles

While he was working on the rudder, the boat drifted forwards

 

Doesn't ring true to me.

 

The last place I'd choose to re-locate my dislodged rudder would be in an empty lock with all the gates closed.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/05/2019 at 17:40, alan_fincher said:

Somewhat staggeringly there are now pictures of what certainly looks like the same boat sunk again, this time below a lock, (possibly the same lock).

What on earth is going on?

 

 

Sunk Boat 2.jpg

Sunk Boat 1.jpg

RCR time lapse of the boat being refloated:

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mike the Boilerman said:

 

Doesn't ring true to me.

 

The last place I'd choose to re-locate my dislodged rudder would be in an empty lock with all the gates closed.

 

 

No? I've reseated a rudder in a lock

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RLWP said:

No? I've reseated a rudder in a lock

 

An empty lock? Why did you choose to do it in an empty lock?

 

I chose to do mine not in a lock, so I wouldn't be impeding any traffic. I can see the attraction of doing it in a full lock, but not n empty one with the gates closed. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mike the Boilerman said:

 

An empty lock? Why did you choose to do it in an empty lock?

 

I chose to do mine not in a lock, so I wouldn't be impeding any traffic. I can see the attraction of doing it in a full lock, but not n empty one with the gates closed. 

 

 

Well, it was a lock, and that's where the boat was

 

It is tempting to try and do quick fixes in locks

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RLWP said:

Well, it was a lock, and that's where the boat was

 

It is tempting to try and do quick fixes in locks

 

Richard

 

I agree. The convenient water level and concrete apron make a good environment when the lock is full. But this lock must have been empty, with all gates and paddles closed during the proposed attempted re-seating. That makes no sense to me. I'd have wanted the lock full before proceeding with reseating the rudder. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mike the Boilerman said:

 

I agree. The convenient water level and concrete apron make a good environment when the lock is full. But this lock must have been empty, with all gates and paddles closed during the proposed attempted re-seating. That makes no sense to me. I'd have wanted the lock full before proceeding with reseating the rudder. 

 

 

Why does the level make any difference, Mike?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the grounding below Thames lock also holed the vessel and it was filling up with water then by the time it got to Clitheroes it was swamped. Engine bay bulkhead would have meant owner may not be aware of water in cabin. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RLWP said:

Why does the level make any difference, Mike?

 

My rudder was too heavy for one person to lift. The pair of us were us were on and off the boat like fleas in a fit. Doing it down in an empty lock lock would have been silly.

 

Took two of us about an hour to do it in the end. By this time I was really expecting to have to dock the boat or sill it. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RLWP said:

And it is lighter in a full lock?

 

I don't know. We did it on a marina pontoon. The guy helping me produced a neat bit bit of kit for viewing why we couldn't get it back in. A 6" tube with glass across the end and a light fixed to the outside. A low-tec endoscope. Would have been a right PITA using that down in an empty lock!

 

Not that it helped, as it happened....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, RLWP said:

And it is lighter in a full lock?

 

Yes because the lock is North/South facing so closing the bottom gates would be blocking the sunlight. Why would someone choose to fix his tiller, while looking through the weed-hatch (?) , with reduced light?

Edited by eid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.