Quinafloat

After emailing Sarina Young at CRT I now have some clarity on the meanings of the coding on a Gold License with a home mooring not on CRT waters. The Code "BW" means ‘things’ which are not on our canal network or cannot be associated with a particular canal. The rest is a composite code in two parts. The first is "007" which means Other Navigation Authorities. The second indicates the navigation authority as below: BW-007-001 Other Navigation - Ancholme BW-007-002 Other Navigation - Basingstoke Canal BW-007-003 Other Navigation - Bridgewater/Manch'r BW-007-004 Other Navigation - Bristol Avon BW-007-005 Other Navigation - Droitwich Trust Canal BW-007-006 Other Navigation - Fens BW-007-007 Other Navigation - Great Ouse BW-007-008 Other Navigation - Humber Estuary BW-007-009 Other Navigation - Lower Avon BW-007-010 Other Navigation - Norfolk Broads BW-007-011 Other Navigation - River Nene BW-007-012 Other Navigation - River Ribble BW-007-013 Other Navigation - River Thames (London) BW-007-014 Other Navigation - River Thames (K&A) BW-007-015 Other Navigation - River Thames (Oxford) BW-007-016 Other Navigation - River Wey BW-007-017 Other Navigation - Thames Estuary BW-007-018 Other Navigation - Upper Avon BW-007-019 Other Navigation - Winsford Flash BW-007-020 Other Navigation - River Derwent BW-007-021 Other Navigation - River Foss BW-007-022 Other Navigation - River Idle Whether the licence is issued on the basis of the BW act 1995 section 17,3,c,i or 17,3,c,ii is determined from the licence application (and any subsequent enquiries that CRT may deem necessary). Having one of the codes listed above means that the boat was licensed on the basis of 17,3,c,i. My thanks to Sarina for digging this all out for me.

It seems to be a feature of mastervolt chargers, mine is a 12/80. When my first one burnt out, Mastervolt replaced it with a refurbished one and I sent mine off so that they could repair it and just charge me for the repair. The refurbished one had to be restarted every time the engine was started. I have a travelpower and that, in combination with the charger, looks after the domestic bank. I complained as remembering to restart the charger every time we cruised, or risking flat batteries was unrealistic. The previous one was simply left in the on position and came on when the travelpower started putting out power. Mastervolt replaced the refurb unit with a new unit and that did not require a restart on engine start, so far so good. It does, however require a restart when I change from shore power to travelpower or vice versa. When the new unit decided to emit smoke instead of electric power I had it rebuilt with different innards by a good refurb specialist company. It works to this day, but still requires a restart or two when we change over to shore power or travelpower. Obviously that was not one of the bits that needed replacement. The travelpower puts out pure sine wave at 230 volts. However it is from +115 to -115, whereas mains electricity is sine wave from 0 to 240. I suspect that the Mastervolt samples the incoming electricity, and, if different from the last time requires a restart. The specification of mains input is: 230v -10% +15% or 117v -10% +15% so it certainly has some sensing/adaption capability. It might be worth checking for voltage fluctuation of your mains input.

It exists. https://www.pcc-cic.org.uk/sites/default/files/articles/attachments/ehrg_gypsies_and_travellers_pcsf_190509.pdf

I'm a liveaboard so have no intention of polluting my canals and rivers. I take the point about professional garbage personnel knowing about sharps, however as I use CaRT rubbish disposal points the problem is the first 100 yards. Firstly I must ensure that my wife is safe carrying the rubbish in a polythene bag. Then I must ensure that the people picking over the rubbish (yes gentle people, they exist) before it is even collected are safe. I don't drink beer or fizzy pop, so If I bought a can, I would have to empty it down the sink first just to be able to use it, and then dispose of a can and a single sharp, that would really be needless pollution. As regards taking them to a proper rubbish disposal place, there are so few near canals I think that everyone can see that unless you own a car, which I do not, that it is pretty impractical. A great many now ban people who arrive on foot these days. Plenty of people use scalpels for electronics, modelling and many other purposes including cutting polythene six pack holders off of ducks necks to prevent them from starving to death. It's just a small, sharp knife with replaceable blades. For those of us who make things rather than buy them they are invaluable for precision work. There is also a sense of scale missing, I dispose of perhaps 3 blades a year. A bucket of ash is vast in comparison. I suspect that a lot of the condemning responses are from people who live in houses and have cars and a boat or two just for fun. They are the real polluters.

My post was certainly not a joke post. I think that the detractors are missing a few salient points. Compared to the surface area of the canal bottom such objects are minute. They will almost certainly sink into the mud and not be uncovered for many years and only by a dredger by which time they will certainly not be sharp. As to the possibility of them ending up round a prop, well having had many years of prop cleaning, the chance of a fishing line with a hook is a more realistic probability. The chance of a single blade being picked up and embedded round a prop, with or without anything else, is frankly laughable. To those who think the dangers are so immense, I suggest a little realistic analysis would be a great thing. Disposal on land of such objects is potentially far more dangerous to people.

Anything really sharp that could injure people dealing with the rubbish goes in the canal. Scalpel blades, broken glass and "stanley" knife blades and suchlike are, in my opinion, far too dangerous to be disposed of any other way. I suppose that in 50 or 100 years some dredging machine might need a band aid because of this but, as our rubbish is now supposed to be sorted it seems to be the safest option.

Try going through London in the tourist season, If it floats and moves it will be photographed. There is absolutely nothing exceptional or photogenic on my bog standard clonecraft.

I take a lot of photos of other peoples boats for my cruising newsletter, and my boat get's photographed a lot. It's all fair game as far as I am concerned. The trouble is that a picture of my boat is now part of a stock collection which means that it it used whenever some hack wants a boat photo. The result is that every so often other boaters tell me that my boat is featured in such and such publication. Sometimes they even buy a copy just for me.

Indeed, nice to see some serious maintenance in that area. I hope that they get in the habit as there are a few more bridges in that area that need fixing.

I'm afraid I know nothing about them. My brother in law, who lives in Ely,and who went to Jesus college in Cambridge happens to be a history buff on the subject of the Great Ouse. When I told him about my experience on the Cam he immediately told me why that stretch had such unusual rules. I have no reason to disbelieve him. I am sure that it is very easy to get round any corner on the Cam in an eight, they are highly maneuverable with eight separate motors. However it would require slowing down.

There was a stretch of the River Cam (and may still be) where the rules are reversed so everybody has to cross to the other (left) side of the river, and give way to craft going upstream. I started digging into this rather strange set of circumstances. It seems that the Cambridge Universities boat clubs used to use 12s rather than 8s and the and it was the extra length of the boats that meant they could not keep to the same side when rounding the bends there at speed (the concept of slowing down is a bit alien to rowing clubs). I then visited the Cam Commissioners to complain about the lunacy of boats going upstream having right of way. The Cam Commissioner explained that when out hill walking it was a general rule that people coming downhill gave way to people coming uphill. Having very recently come downstream in flood conditions at very high speed I tried to explain to him the problem. Last time I was down that way nothing had changed but it was a few years back. The concept of passing other boats whilst keeping to the right if in a narrow channel, had (and may still have) at least one exception in the UK.

A drop of cyanoacrylate should do the trick without all of the heavy engineering. put some on the screw thread and tighten as best possible with what you have.

The "on CaRT system" numbers seem to check out in general, but do not actually appear in the list of locations I have. So they look as reasonable as the list of locations. The trend continues with BW-007 numbers pretty much in accordance with expectations for off system licences. Mike. I think that we are now trying to invent electricity by intensely studying a light bulb. We have the pattern, it is now time to ask the questions of CaRT and see if the answers match the pattern. Thanks for your efforts and confirmation of the pattern. I will report back on what I find out.

I think your "two penneth" provides some pretty solid reasoning reasoning based on fact. Many thanks for your time and effort. I will still check with CaRT when they are back as to the actual meaning of the codes, as nobody who has replied seems to know the actual details of the codes, and their interpretation, for boats that moor off of the CaRT system . I find it very interesting that both Oundle and Northampton get the same coding which would reinforce your analysis and refute some of the previous interpretations. I had previously heard of a boater on the Great Ouse with a home mooring finding out that everybody who did not have a home mooring on CaRT waters got a CC licence. If that were true it may even be that the "BW" code indicates continuous cruising.

The situation is that Northampton Marina is about 1km from the end of CaRT waters. Using the only list of location codes I have, the word Northampton did not exist. CaRT seem not to have location codes on other navigations waters at the Km level of accuracy. Therefore the 007 is not a km designation. Are you saying that code 007 is or could be EA? I use both CRT canals and rivers as well as EA waters. Little point in buying a gold licence otherwise.