I'm sure this must have been done to death, but at risk of being flamed, here we go...
Yesterday my wife and I completed the purchase of our first NB, a 2004 55' John White boat. Pre-purchase survey highlighted a few galvanic corrosion pits that should be spot welded before blacking in 2-pack epoxy. The boat has lived on a marina with shore power for the past 7 years, thankfully not moored against metal, otherwise the corrosion would have been much worse. Needless to say we will be fitting an isolating transformer and / or galvanic isolator.
So protecting the hull is a priority. However, for the time being we simply can't afford** to get it grit blasted and 2-packed, so we plan for now to get the welding done then get it bitumen blacked. We plan on having it blasted and 2-packed next Spring.
My question is should we:
Wire brush the surface after welding and apply 3 coats of bitumen, or
Wire brush, apply Fertan then apply 3 coats of bitumen,
Wire brush, apply Vactan then apply 3 coats of bitumen.
None of the above - do something completely different?
I don't mind spending the time applying rust converter, but only if it's worthwhile, bearing in mind the boat will be out for a long-term hull treatment in a year's time. How likely is a hull coated only in bitumen to deteriorate externally in 12 months? We will be putting on new anodes, of course.
**we can afford to get the blasting and 2-pack done, but with £2000 round trip to lift and transport the boat to a gritblasting facility, plus we want thermal zinc treatment under the 2-pack, we need to budget £5-£6k for the work. As inexperienced boaters, we can't get insurance for tidal waterways until we pass a helmsmanship course - as we are on the Lancaster canal, we would need to cross the Ribble Link to get everything done without road transport. So we're kind of trapped into this short-term solution.
Thanks in advance for any guidance. The boat's out of the water now, so I have all options available before putting her back in the water.