Jump to content

MarkH2159

PatronDonate to Canal World
  • Posts

    166
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MarkH2159

  1. On 19/02/2022 at 10:14, Dr Bob said:

     

    You may have said that but you also said (see below)

     

     

     

    I repeat again, this at best misleading and at worst DANGEROUS. If you are homebrewing a system, you need to be very careful if you are taking LiFePO4s up to 100% (or 99%). Once you are in the voltage knee (95%+) then you are in territory where you need to be in control of what is going on. Mark, you blindly tell the world that they are safe and happy in that regime. For newbies who dont understand, that is DANGEROUS.

    How do you know you are not at 100% in one cell. You look at other forums and people will report their cell balance at 3.7V, 3.5V, 3.4V and 3.4V. Is that safe? Of course it isn't. Only someone who didnt have a clue, or a fool would operate like that. You say in one breath that you charge to 90% then in another you say to almost full. Almost full to most uninititated is 99%. In no posts do you say keep away from 100%.

    Homebrewing an Li bank needs thought and consideration of what can go wrong and actions that keep the system safe. By buying a 'one stop shop' from a vendor it is different - they have responsibility - but homebrewing is different, you have responsibility.

    I have read a previous post of your on another thread (which recieved 4 greenies - so it must be right???????????????) which suggests to me that you dont really understand the main issue with Li's. Can you remind us of how you avoid overcharging? I may have got it wrong and you do fully understand and if so, sorry I mentioned it.

     

     

     

    Ah well, the safety is in the BMS settings and knowing how to read and adjust them.

    I know I am not 100% in any single cell because the BMS is constantly monitoring and has an individual Cell High Voltage Disconnect.

    It also has a Cell Low Voltage Disconnect, as well as a Pack Sum Voltage High/Low, Cell Differential Voltage Disconnect etc.

    The only time I did take it all to 100% is when I was performing the initial Top Balancing.

    So to remind you how I am able to avoid overcharging or any other 'dangerous' situations is by using a decent BMS with the correct settings which has safety features that cannot be exceeded.

     

    Thanks for the insult that I 'blindly tell the world that they are safe and happy in that regime'

    The fact is I am neither blind nor living dangerously.

    I am just one of many who have self built Lithium Batteries quite successfully and we are all quite happy about them.

    Now if that somehow scares you, then carry on and be scared, but do not try to tell others how wrong we are because the proof is in the pudding.

     

    • Greenie 1
  2. On 18/02/2022 at 08:10, MtB said:

     

     

     

    Mr Sterling's listing on ebay is sketchy and lacking in detail at best!

     

    In addition to the temperature limits being user-configurable, are charge and discharge disconnect voltages user-configurable too please? 

     

    Muchly thanks. 

     

     

    Yes and yes.

     All voltages are user configurable.

    Cell High/Low Voltage disconnect, Pack Sum High/Low voltage disconnect, Balance start voltage, Cell differential Balance start etc etc.

    • Greenie 1
  3. 11 hours ago, Dr Bob said:

     

    The comments that some uniformed people make on here is mindblowing. Where do you get that information from? At best it is misleading and at worst DANGEROUS! If you had said 'mostly safe and happy under 90%' then I would agree.

     

    See the following link to a thread posted 3 years ago. At that time there was certianly not enough data to support your claim. Our company has been working on the thermal runaway issues since then (and including LiFePO4 cells) helping develop a pre theremal runaway warning technique. I consider myself a technical expert on this type of battery chemistry, even if I cant design the electical system to control alternator charge.

     

     

    I would recommend MarkH2159 read that thread and the associated links.

     

    Anyone considering installing a home brew system of LiFePO4s needs to do a safety assessment on what they are installing and the starting position for that is to as much as possible keep away from 100% charging. I use 90% as my upper limit over which the auto disconnect works and my 'operating proceedure' says only go to 100% when I am personally in manual control of the voltage and current. Keeping LiFePO4s at 90% or below is very very unlikely to present an ignition hazard on well trusted cells (it is not going to happen on a canal boat). The risk is much higher at 99%.

    There is very little point in taking these to 99%. The whole idea is that you dont need to fully charge. Why risk safety when thermal runaways are a risk?

    Obviously you missed my post where I said I set the BMS is set to cut the charge at a Pack Voltage of 14v and the discharge at 12v,

    This keeps the LiFePOs in the safe zone (90% high - 10% low) and that along with regular cycling is all they need.

    • Greenie 1
  4. 2 hours ago, nicknorman said:


    As you say, watts = volts x amps. But the volts is the voltage dropped across the resistor, not the system voltage. So if you wanted to drop 0.3v at 50A it would be 15w. And the resistor would be 0.006 ohms.

    Spot On !!!

    And at 0.006 ohms the extra heat created would be........Not Discernable

    • Greenie 1
  5. 6 minutes ago, MoominPapa said:

     

    I believe you, but in that case a suitable ballast resistor would stay cool too. If has the same effect it has the same resistance and dissipates the same amount of power. BTW have you actually calculated what the power dissipation is?

     

    I can't help thinking that all this effect with B2Bs and bits of wire are avoiding the real solution, which is properly implemented alternator regulator.

     

    MP.

    I have no need to calculate the power dissipation.

    You seem to think the unused alternator power is being somehow redirected to create heat, but that is not the way it works at all.

     

    I do know that the load on my alternator is reduced, therefore the heat it produces is less and life of unit and belt is increased.

     

    I also know that B2B units cost a lot of money and often generate a lot of heat and are another complicated electronic gizmo prone to failure.

     

    I also know that at a cost of around £4 I have put in a simple and safe method of achieving the necessary.

     

    Changing the alternator or its regulator is definitely not necessary and I am not the only one who has proved it.

    • Greenie 2
  6. 39 minutes ago, Dr Bob said:

     

     

    Yes they are safe but

    ??

     

    The reason for the 14v Charge cut off is so that the Lithiums do not actually reach their full 100% charge capacity. Unlike lead Acids the LiFePO4s do not fair well being fully charged all the time.

     

    Similarly the low voltage discharge cut off is set to 12v so they never get to being totally flat either.

     

    Using the range 14v to 12v keeps the Lithium cells running at between 90 and 10% charge, a range in which they are both happy and safe and gives me a usable 80% of the 280AH total.

     

    Do not confuse LiFePO4 with Lithium Ion batteries.

    LiFePO4s are perfectly safe and happy at under 100% charge state.

    • Greenie 1
  7. On 15/02/2022 at 08:21, MtB said:

    Thanks for flagging this up Mr Biscuits, most interesting.

     

    A few questions that leapt to mind and answered by reading the Sterling bumpf...

     

    1) When charging from an alternator a B2B charger is needed. Is a LA battery still necessary? The answer is yes, use the starter battery. Looking at the diagram the old domestic LA bank is dispensed with and the B2B charger is powered from the starter batt, which is in turn powered/charged by the alternator.

     

    2) Low temperature charge disconnect. The Daly BMS you mention being used in this LFP battery is not popular here in the UK as it does not have a low temperature charge disconnect. (The Overkill BMS is preferred here, as it has).  The Sterling spec does actually state 0 degrees C charge disconnection is included so that's good. 

     

    3) How much is the B2B charger? Answer: retail price £345!!

     

    But like you, I notice Sterling often have B2B sold on clearance for much less. I bought one for £60 a couple of years ago and what arrived was indistinguishable from a brand new one. 

     

     

    My 100A Daly BMS purchased from Mr Sterling does indeed have a Low Temperature charge disconnect.

    It actually has programmable

    Charge High Temp Disconnect

    Charge LowTemp Disconnect

    Discharge High Temp Disconnect

    Discharge Low Temp Disconnect

    Differential Temp Protect

    MOS Temp Protect

    • Greenie 1
  8. 24 minutes ago, matty40s said:

    You obviously have no idea of weather history...or the wrong storm, the 1987 non hurricane was an extra tropical Bay of Biscay storm that tracked NE.

     

    You might be referring to the 1953 storm that flooded the east coast and Canvey??

    Now you are being silly, the media has been pretty quiet until lunchtime today, the met has warned this from Monday.

    ah yes, apologies, my bad, I spent a lot of time in the southern hemisphere where things do happen the other way round.

  9. 58 minutes ago, MoominPapa said:

    The long wire is a ballast resistance and will produce heat. I suggest not bundling it up or installing is in enclosed compartments or touching flamable material.

     

    MP.

    You speak from experience..?

    There is no discernable extra heat produced as the increased resistance is actually minimal.

    It is basically just enough to cause the regulator to drop the output of the alternator.

     

    I repeat, no heat, no insulation melting, no sign of any such issues.

    It is in a single coil, held by small zip ties, in an enclosed engine compartment.

     

    Nothing is going to happen because 10mm2 cable can easily handle the total output of the alternator which is 70 amps.

    • Greenie 2
  10. 3 minutes ago, Tony1 said:

     

    Thanks for explaining, and can I just check- are you using an A2B charger, or just running straight from the alternator to the AGM?

     

    Forgive my questioning, I'm trying to get an idea of it in my head so that I can explain it to people that I talk to who show an interest in lithium batteries.

    I sometimes mention it when I get talking about boat upgrades, and people are often very interested in lithiums, but when I talk about needing BMV712s, BEP switches, and B2B chargers, they see the cost mounting and quickly lose interest, which I think is a shame. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Alternator is direct to AGM via 10mm2 cable 2m long.

    No fancy B2B or DC to DC, no switches etc.

    The long wire method proves them all to be totally unnecessary and a waste of money.

    Keep it simple is always the best way.

     

    • Greenie 3
  11. 2 hours ago, blackrose said:

    40mph winds in East Northants now. That's windy enough for me. I'm not looking forward to Friday when it's supposed to be 70mph here.

     

     

    You think the Met Office weather forecast is media hype? Ok if you want to prove something to us then take your boat out on Friday! 🤣

    I refer to the 'media hype' of today along with of course all previous recent weather hype such as 'snow bomb to blanket the whole of the country' etc etc.

    It is quite obvious that the media are now exaggerating all weather related phenomena, possibly under instruction from those in control who want us all to stay home.

  12. 7 hours ago, matty40s said:

    ....and there wasnt.

    However, there was a rapidly deepening Low pressure with explosive cyclogenesis and a track similar to what is coming Friday.

    Similar track..????

    35 years ago the depression tracked down the North Sea moving in a south westerly direction.

    I think you will find that the predicted track of Fridays depression is exactly the opposite.

  13. 1 hour ago, Tony1 said:

     

    Apologies if I've missed the detail, I'm rubbish with electrics- but how is the current delivered to the lithium battery? 

    The way I've read that, it sounds as if the AGM goes straight to the inverter. 

    The Alternator is connected to the AGM which is connected to the Inverter which is connected to the Lithium. Basically all three units are in parallel.

    The reason for this is threefold...

     

    As Lithiums do not like temperature change and can be damaged if attempts are made to charge at very low temperatures, the BMS is programmed to cut off the Lithium at 5C.

    By putting the Lithium inside, in the same locker as the Inverter, it overcomes the possibility of it ever suffering freezing temperatures.

     

    Secondly it extends the amount of wiring between the alternator and the Lithium thereby introducing a resistance which artificially reduces the lithium ability to suck too much charge from the alternator.

     

    Thirdly as the Lithium is providing most of the power demand of the inverter, having it close by on short cables reduces any cabling losses.

     

    By using the 'long wire' and 10mm2 cable I am still connecting the alternator with a wire of sufficient size to handle its total rated output of 70 amps but the resistance induced automatically cuts the amperage. 

    This means that there is no need for any kind of ballast resistance or other add in that could complicate things and produce heat, thereby wasting energy.

     

     

    1 hour ago, Tony1 said:

     

     

     

    • Greenie 2
  14. Have a look on YouTube at Narrowboat Pirate who recently coated her hull with epoxy and proved the shot blaster theory wrong.

     

    I was drydocking and coating ships for over 40 years and there was never any need to shot blast before applying epoxy coatings. The costs were 100s of times more than a narrowboat and paint manufacturers such as Jotun, Sigma, Hempel etc were all happy to give a warranty.

     

    Its all in the preparation.

  15. I have recently installed a LiFePO4 battery using the 'fudge' method and can report excellent results.

     

    Basically I have thrown out my ageing but still good Lead Acids ( 8 x 110 AH) and put in a self built 280AH LiFePO4 in parallel with an Alphahouse Batteries 100AH Deep Cycle AGM.

     

    The AGM is in the engine bay battery box, with all the connections running to/from it.

    Input from Alternator and Solar, Output to Boat services and 2 Kw Inverter/Charger.

     

    The new 280AH LiFePO4 with Daly 100A BMS is inside, connected directly to the inverter via an isolator.

     

    Having an ageing Beta 35 with a 70 amp domestic alternator I had to be mindful of the charge routine and the potential for the LiFePO4 to suck the alternator to death.

    instead of going the expensive DC to DC charger route, I chose the 'long wire' method to limit the output of my alternator to a maximum of 45 amps which it is happy to produce all day long with no overheating issues.

     

    So...

    Alternator to AGM via 2m x 10mm2 cable.

    AGM to Inverter via 2m x 70 mm2 cable - The ones that were originally in place.

    LiFePO4 to Inverter via 0.5m x 35 mm2 Cable and Isolator.

     

    I use a Shunt based Battery Monitor on the AGM and the Daly BMS to monitor the voltages and amps in/out of each battery.

     

    I have nothing but positives to report....

    Amount of available power with no worries about low voltages or Lead Acid 'damage'

    Inverter can be on 24/7 with no issues.

    No need to run engine or generator to charge batteries every day, instead I can easily go 3 days between charges.

    Run time of engine or generator is around 1/4 of previous to achieve 100% full batteries.

    Ability to use the washing machine or microwave anytime without worrying about 'killing' batteries.

     

    When running the engine I see around 45 amps output from the Alternator at 1500 rpm due to the 'long wire' set up reducing the ability of the LiFePO4 to suck charge.

    When the LiFePO4 is charging I can see it taking around 40 amps while the AGM takes from 5 amps down to 0.5 as it reaches 100%.

    The Daly BMS is set to cut off at a pack total voltage of 14v which keeps the LiFePO4 slightly under 100% full and quite happy.

    When the BMS cuts off charge there is no noticeable change as the alternator simply continues charging the AGM as it would normally.

    Solar quite happily charges both batteries at full rate with no noticeable difference.

    Genny bangs 60 amps into LiFePO4 all the time it is running so takes less time.

     

    My system sits between 13.8 and 13.2 volts all day every day no matter what I do.

    The AGM sits at near 100% charge most of the time, only when the LiFePO4 is down to 30% does the AGM start to drop to around 95%.

     

    Best part is being able to achieve all of the above for less than the price of 4 new Lead Acids, enough to make anyone smile. Basically I built 2 LiFePO4s and sold one as well as flogging the old LAs.

    • Greenie 4
  16. 4 hours ago, Tracy D'arth said:

    I've seen it!     Its the weight of anodes dragging it under.

     

    How can she complain 3 years after survey?

     

    I have never had a survey on any boat I have purchased, its not worth the paper its written on anyway.

    Spot on as ever 🙂 

    I surveyed my own boat whilst it was in the water.

    Most of the time was spent going through the extensive history and meticulous documentation that the owner had kept so well. Seeing the maintenance records and a quick look under the floor was basically enough.

    Also the fact that it is a Peter Nicholls build told me quite a lot about it.

     

    Of course with a different boat, possibly poorly maintained and lacking history, I probably wouldnt have bothered. 

    Some of had good results with surveys throwing up issues which the seller has fixed before the money has been handed over, but many have not.

    Caveat Emptor and all that. 

  17. We lived as a family of 4 in a permanent caravan for years, 32 ft Bluebird as I recall.

    It had a brilliant 'Murphy type' fold down double bed that simply went up into the wall, still made up.

    Then a dining table folded out from the bed base.

    It was so simple to fold the table and lower the bed down, all ready for use.

    If I was remodelling my boat I would definitely be incorporating something similar.

  18. I can concur with your concerns regarding finding a mooring on that stretch, having done the trip myself last May/June.

    The river is difficult to find decent places to stop, having more "NO MOORING" signs than the Thames, as well as the usual continuous moorers occupying every available slot.

    At Hanham lock the 48 hr moorings were full but I was lucky to find a spot on the very nice pontoon at Bitton just before bridge 211.

    In Bath after Bridge 202 there were plenty of mootings on the river.

    Continuing east I had no further issues finding spots to moor and stopped just after Dundas services on rings.

    From then onwards Avoncliffe to the other side of BoA was very difficult to find anywhere half decent.

    Moulton Drive was ok but the bank is very soft and passing boats continually pulled the pins out.

    Next stop at Seend was good and I got lucky grabbing a spot just as a hire boat left.

    Further east the 48 hr moorings at Bishop Cannings were all occupied, as was Pewsey and Gt Bedwyn.

    I stopped one night on a lock landing, arriving late and leaving early so as not to cause inconvenience.

    From there onwards I had no real issues finding decent mooring spots, but noted that anywhere with any decent access to a road was always occupied.

     

  19. I recall seeing something about the redevelopment of Marple Wharf years ago but it seems planning permission was denied.

    Well things may be changing fairly soon from my observations of the past few days.

     

    There has been a CaRT Team measuring up and looking to move things around and it would appear the original plan is now a go ahead deal. 

    This is what I managed to 'overhear' them discussing.

     

    The old Wharf building will have a new role.

    The New Horizons PWD Boat will be moving to be moored closer to the Wharf building - saw them measuring up and assessing the arrangements 2 days ago. It will go partially under the wharf building.

    The old building in the wharf yard will become the Toilet/Elsan point but access will be limited because of the New Horizons boat.

    The water point will likely be moved to the lock landing around the corner because of access limitation as above.

     

    Wait for it....

    The existing New Horizons yard, CaRT yard and toilet block etc will be gone and 6 new houses built on the site.

  20. On 15/06/2021 at 12:36, mikerob said:

    urgent mooring wanted in or around stockport marple or high lane

     

    any help or guidance much appreciated

    Did you find anything?

    I was offered a private offside mooring between High Lane and Marple yesterday. and went to look at it today.

    It is very 'off grid' but doable providing your boat is not too big or deep.

    Has its own access and parking, but nothing else.

    Land owner seems reasonable enough, but would not commit to a figure when asked how much ????

     

    Msg me for info.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.