Happy New Year to everyone.
I wonder if any others have had similar experiences to us with daily variations in headroom on canals and rivers. Having a broad beam barge with a fixed wheelhouse – from Gary Peacock and the team at Ledgard Bridge, we are extremely interested in the headroom on bridges. With fuel and water tanks all full we measured our headroom at 2.36 metres, or 7’9”. That’s been fine on the Calder and Hebble, the Aire and Calder, the Trent and more recently here on the Thames. But over Christmas we decided to take visiting family and friends for a little outing from here at Limehouse Basin, up the Regent, the Hertford Union and then a few ks up the Lee Navigation. Our research indicated the lowest bridges on the Hertford were 2.6m, while we would only just make it under a couple further up on the Lee, where we had only 2.36m – possibly touch and (not) go. However on day-one of our trip we found the Hertford bridges just as low as couple on the Lee Navigation. Onlookers gathered to see if we would hit bridges with our wheelhouse and some were almost at the point of making bets we would fail to make it, as some on board were! But we did .... just. On our return trip the following day however, we glided through without any drama as we had 100mls – or several inches to spare. Someone must have gone through ahead of us in a way which considerably lowered the water levels in the pounds.
Where could we go next we wonder?
Our research also tells us that we would not be able to get much beyond Reading on the K&A as again there are bridges with 2.34 in headroom – Kings Road Bridge for example. We would love to be able to go down the K&A, to Newbery or possibly even Bath, but if2.34 really means 2.34, it’s not going to be possible. But does 2.34 really mean 2.34 ALL the time? Is there anyone who can give us advice on this or point us in the right direction?
Thanks
Stewart MacLennan
"Endellion"
www.maclennan.com.au/Endellion/home.html