This is, of course, good news.
However, the cynic in me sees that spin is alive and well.
CRT and the IWA say :
"The Government’s decision to move the line away from the canal is welcome news for the waterways, for visitors and for the local economy. It represents a growing recognition of the waterways’ unique environment and heritage, and the important role they play as antidotes to the stresses and pressures of modern life."
It would be nice if that were really true. I have my doubts because :
"Hyder’s report set out a feasible and preferable alternative alignment largely avoiding the canal, substantially reducing embankment heights, noise and visual intrusion, and potentially saving the project millions of pounds."
I think the saving of "millions of pounds" was by far the stronger driver for the change in the route.
(Well, I said I was cynical!)