Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 28/11/15 in all areas

  1. I keep my boat off CRT waters in the winter, and pay for a licence for the 6 months in the summer when I cruise their waterways. I think it is terrible that they have not sent me any correspondence at all to remind me about their charges for my next licence.
    3 points
  2. I'd say! Greenie given to the messenger and not to the sender!
    1 point
  3. If it's important to safety it should be checked. If it was done right at build time why was the alternator wired up incorrectly? If the BSS man suggests solutions to safety issues it shouldn't make the safety issue worse. You can install gas and electrical systems. If you built your own car you would have to go through a SVA first not a MOT.
    1 point
  4. Actually this thread is quite remarkable. I reckon two posters agree or partly agree with the Op, all the others agree he's looking for sympathy where absolutely none is due.
    1 point
  5. A case management hearing was held last Thursday, at which CaRT presented their application for a strike out, and their opposition to my being given right of audience. It was acknowledged that insufficient time had been allowed for these matters to be properly addressed at Thursday’s hearing, although preliminary submissions were made, at the Master’s request, from all present. Upshot is that there is to be a further, longer hearing for sometime next January, subject to Counsel’s dates to avoid. A couple of the ‘technical’ procedural irregularities CaRT had complained of were sorted out by the common sense suggestion by the Master that I re-do a couple of pages, adding the necessary “Statement of Truth” to them, to be signed and dated. Leigh has the opportunity also, by 5 January, to lodge a Statement of his own respecting any challenge to the facts in Shoosmiths Statement, and skeleton arguments can be lodged also. At least for the purpose of that next hearing, I will be allowed to speak in response to the Master, given that the Statement of Case was my preparation. I will need to show whether or not it fails to be “concise” according to relevant Practice directions, [and presumably, if not why not, and whether that should qualify for the strike out CaRT ask for].
    1 point
  6. You are one of the usual suspects!
    1 point
  7. 1 point
  8. If I read this right, you agree that it is the marina's responsibility to make sure that the place is safe.
    1 point
  9. Some folk would get bent out of shape if CRT sent them a Christmas card with a free licence in it.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.