If I were a member I'd do it free today
I didn't say I don't want them to support boaters who break the rules, I'm just saying I'm not a member so I don't have any say in whether they SHOULD support them, and the idea of joining so I can have a say in their policy is just too daunting when it takes committee meetings and a change of council members to sort out an urgent technical problem with a web host. But as NABO have made it clear they don't 'condone' boaters who break the rules my main reason for wanting to join and support them (their legal challenge to the mooring regulations) has disappeared.
We have actually been 'almost' legit (with regard to mooring and moving) for the past couple of years (and it has probably cost us more than paying for a permanent mooring) but if I join a national association of boat owners I would expect them to support and represent me just because I'm a boat owner, not to pick and choose depending on BW's rule changes.
And I am confused about the whole legal challenge thing because if NABO expects its members to stick to the rules, what difference does it make whether the rules are legal?
I heard a story yesterday of some boaters who have been paying to stay on a permanent BW mooring for years, who are now being hassled because it is against the rules to live on a boat on those moorings. Some of those people are NABO members. Will NABO just tell them they don't condone the boaters' behaviour and they are on their own?