Jump to content


Photo

Aylesbury Arm Stoppage


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1 Tim Lewis

Tim Lewis

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,771 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East London
  • Boat Name:Fulbourne

Posted 28 March 2013 - 04:11 PM

Aylesbury Arm Closure Lock 11 to Lock 13

Thursday 28 March 2013 until further notice
Locks 11 to 13 on the Aylesbury Arm are closed with immediate effect
due to a collapse on the towpath side at Lock 12 which has resulted in
the lock chamber being unstable and unsafe for navigation.

The towpath is also closed
Enquiries: 0303 0404040


How long to rebuild a lock?

Tim
  • 0

#2 Tim Lewis

Tim Lewis

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,771 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East London
  • Boat Name:Fulbourne

Posted 01 April 2013 - 09:51 PM

Aylesbury Arm Closure Lock 11 to Lock 13

Thursday 28 March 2013 until further notice
Locks 11 to 13 on the Aylesbury Arm are closed with immediate effect
due to a collapse on the towpath side at Lock 12 which has resulted in
the lock chamber being unstable and unsafe for navigation.

The towpath is also closed
Enquiries: 0303 0404040


How long to rebuild a lock?

Tim


From Yesterday:

Posted Image

Tim
  • 0

#3 ChimneyChain

ChimneyChain

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 675 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:GU South
  • Boat Name:GUCCC No.117

Posted 01 April 2013 - 09:56 PM

I say 9mths to fix this situation.

Darren
  • 0

#4 BEngo

BEngo

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,482 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat Name:Jarrah

Posted 02 April 2013 - 06:22 AM

From Yesterday:

Posted Image

Tim

6-8 weeks on site. How long is a piece of string to get all the ducks in a row to get on site:

Money
contract (though maybe this will fall under the Galliford umbrella contract)
design
materials
manpower
machinery
permissions
etc..



N
  • 0

#5 Pembroke

Pembroke

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 75 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Northampton
  • Boat Name:Pembroke

Posted 02 April 2013 - 06:30 AM

Take a good while to fix this
Maybe they could use the crane they fished out the canal up north
  • 0

#6 sueb

sueb

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,181 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 07:37 AM

Better get digging Tim!
  • 0
If it was more important to speak than to listen you would have two mouths and one ear.

#7 matty40s

matty40s

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,433 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat Name:Old Friends

Posted 02 April 2013 - 09:46 AM

.....if you remove your fenders, you might just squeeze past....
  • 0

#8 Pluto

Pluto

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,292 posts
  • Location:Barlic
  • Boat Name:Pluto

Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:44 AM

Having seen a very poor engineering description of the reason for this collapse on another canal website, I think it worthwhile putting the record straight. Lock walls should be designed to take an alternate load - pushing outwards when full and pushing inwards when empty. As the inward pressure comes from the earth fill behind the wall, this was perceived by early engineers to have been significantly less, particularly after the collapse of a straight-sided lock wall on the Canal du Midi shortly after that canal opened in the 1680s. All locks on that canal now have curved sides as that was thought the best solution. However, it could make the walls more liable to distortion when the lock is full, as it is difficult to make the ends of the lock wall by the gates strong enough - they would tend to be pushed outwards when the lock was full. Subsequently almost all locks have been built with straight sides. The earth backing to the lock wall gives it the static load needed to resist the force created by the water when the lock is full. When empty, the restraint of that static load forcing the wall out is reliant upon the way the wall is connected to the brick or stone invert at the bottom of the lock. Some early canal locks, such as those on the L&LC in Yorkshire, were built on wooden foundations where creep of the bottom of the lock wall could be a problem, and that was why brick or stone inverts became universal on canal locks from around 1790.

What has happened here is a failure to stop leakage through the lock wall. This leakage can create a void behind the lock wall which becomes filled with water when the lock is filled, as well as just from land drainage, particularly in wet weather. This creates a force on the joint between invert and wall which it is not designed to take, and hence the movement of the wall. Keeping the lock full or empty would have made little difference to the result.

On some canals, locks were supposed to be kept full because they had no bywash, and excess water was fed through the lock. Keeping the lock full has the added advantage of keeping the bottom gates wet, and so tight, and of keeping any puddle behind the lock walls wet, and so in good condition. If puddle becomes dry, it cracks and can cause leakage, with leakage removing material and hence creating a void. On old or poorly-maintained locks, this does give a reason for emptying the lock after use, though they should be emptied slowly to allow any water in voids behind the wall to flow out and not to create excess pressure on the back of the lock wall.
  • 0

#9 ChimneyChain

ChimneyChain

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 675 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:GU South
  • Boat Name:GUCCC No.117

Posted 03 April 2013 - 10:04 AM

Will the new lock be a cast concrete trough or will they rebuild it to the original spec.

Darren
  • 0

#10 Pluto

Pluto

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,292 posts
  • Location:Barlic
  • Boat Name:Pluto

Posted 03 April 2013 - 12:13 PM

Will the new lock be a cast concrete trough or will they rebuild it to the original spec.

Darren

This lock at Kidsgrove is a good example of what can be done with concrete. I suspect it was built because of subsidence around 1950/60, with local canal men doing the work as it is an almost exact copy of the earlier brick locks, with all the curves and slopes necessary for working a boat through without lines catching. Concrete doesn't have to result in a non-traditional shape.
Posted Image
  • 0

#11 magpie patrick

magpie patrick

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,582 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Frome, Somerset
  • Boat Name:Juno

Posted 03 April 2013 - 12:43 PM

Will the new lock be a cast concrete trough or will they rebuild it to the original spec.

Darren


I don't know what CRT will do but this is how I'd deal with it.

Drain the lock completely,

Demolish the wall (most of the job has already been done!)

Remove unstable earth, this may cut back a lot further than people expect

Build a RIC retaining wall, as well as foundations anchor it back into the stable soil

Fill the gap, ideally with hardcore so grout can then be added

Build a face to the retaining wall in suitable brick

grass the lockside
  • 0

"You can trust in the power of music, you can trust in the power of prayer, but it's only the whites of your knuckles, that's keeping this plane in the air"

 

Oysterband, Dancing as Fast as I can


#12 LEO

LEO

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat Name:ALBION MILLS

Posted 03 April 2013 - 12:53 PM

I don't know what CRT will do but this is how I'd deal with it.

Drain the lock completely,

Demolish the wall (most of the job has already been done!)

Remove unstable earth, this may cut back a lot further than people expect

Build a RIC retaining wall, as well as foundations anchor it back into the stable soil

Fill the gap, ideally with hardcore so grout can then be added

Build a face to the retaining wall in suitable brick

grass the lockside


You are a wise man - this is what BW did on a direct labour basis when they rebuilt a couple of locks on the Marsworth flight some years ago. One of them was the lock which was open for public inspection a few weeks ago.

Leo.

PS - It's how I would do it as well.
  • 0

#13 BEngo

BEngo

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,482 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat Name:Jarrah

Posted 03 April 2013 - 01:17 PM

You are a wise man - this is what BW did on a direct labour basis when they rebuilt a couple of locks on the Marsworth flight some years ago. One of them was the lock which was open for public inspection a few weeks ago.

Leo.

PS - It's how I would do it as well.



I believe CART's national engineers are proposing a 'piled solution'.

N
  • 0

#14 LEO

LEO

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,734 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat Name:ALBION MILLS

Posted 03 April 2013 - 02:41 PM

I believe CART's national engineers are proposing a 'piled solution'.

N

A possible way of fixing it but piling normally requires fair sized machinery, could be access problems here.

L.
  • 0

#15 ChimneyChain

ChimneyChain

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 675 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:GU South
  • Boat Name:GUCCC No.117

Posted 03 April 2013 - 02:55 PM

Will English heritage have to be involved I wonder? As they do like to try and keep things where possibly the same as what was there originally.

Darren
  • 0

#16 BEngo

BEngo

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,482 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Boat Name:Jarrah

Posted 03 April 2013 - 03:11 PM

Will English heritage have to be involved I wonder? As they do like to try and keep things where possibly the same as what was there originally.

Darren



I understand that EH had to be involved when Lock 4 on the Arm was rebuilt last winter but that Lock 12 is not Listed in any way.

Access is not bad- there is a decent sized road to Lock 13, with good connections to the Aston Clinton bypass and a gate from that road to the towpath. The 300yds of towpath from lock 13 to lock 12 is not piled but does have a decent edge to it and reasonable width. Whether its good enough for a big digger and a vibrating piling rig I do not know. The towpath along the arm is supposed to be being improved on the back of the Arla dairy construction so maybe this bit will be an early stretch. There is also the possibility of access from the bridge above, though the road is pretty narrow and would involve going through Aston Clinton. The towpath to this bridge is again quite wide, and has been piled, though there is no easy access to the towpath at the bridge for big kit. I have also heard rumour that access across a field might be needed.

N
  • 0

#17 KevMc

KevMc

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 597 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Apsley
  • Boat Name:Last Chance

Posted 03 April 2013 - 03:24 PM

I understand that EH had to be involved when Lock 4 on the Arm was rebuilt last winter but that Lock 12 is not Listed in any way.

Access is not bad- there is a decent sized road to Lock 13, with good connections to the Aston Clinton bypass and a gate from that road to the towpath. The 300yds of towpath from lock 13 to lock 12 is not piled but does have a decent edge to it and reasonable width. Whether its good enough for a big digger and a vibrating piling rig I do not know. The towpath along the arm is supposed to be being improved on the back of the Arla dairy construction so maybe this bit will be an early stretch. There is also the possibility of access from the bridge above, though the road is pretty narrow and would involve going through Aston Clinton. The towpath to this bridge is again quite wide, and has been piled, though there is no easy access to the towpath at the bridge for big kit. I have also heard rumour that access across a field might be needed.

N


I'm no expert but as the canals were mostly dug by hand to start with I can't see why they can't just get a crew of navvies in to do the job ... it certainly wouldn't cause any damage to the surrounding environment and might even be quicker
  • 1

Reluctant spreadsheet wrangler                         http://uk.linkedin.c...n/kevinmcilroy/                                            #voteindependent


#18 David Mack

David Mack

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,360 posts

Posted 03 April 2013 - 05:29 PM

Access is not bad- there is a decent sized road to Lock 13, with good connections to the Aston Clinton bypass and a gate from that road to the towpath. The 300yds of towpath from lock 13 to lock 12 is not piled but does have a decent edge to it and reasonable width. Whether its good enough for a big digger and a vibrating piling rig I do not know. The towpath along the arm is supposed to be being improved on the back of the Arla dairy construction so maybe this bit will be an early stretch. There is also the possibility of access from the bridge above, though the road is pretty narrow and would involve going through Aston Clinton. The towpath to this bridge is again quite wide, and has been piled, though there is no easy access to the towpath at the bridge for big kit. I have also heard rumour that access across a field might be needed.


No doubt CRT thought the access to Apperley Bridge was "not bad" and the towpath had a "decent edge to it". :)
  • 0

#19 Tim Lewis

Tim Lewis

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,771 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:East London
  • Boat Name:Fulbourne

Posted 13 June 2013 - 08:20 AM

Update from local paper:

 

http://www.buckshera...tinue-1-5184549

 

Tim


  • 0

#20 Lesd

Lesd

    Long Standing Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,439 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:GU
  • Boat Name:Blue Pearl

Posted 16 June 2013 - 10:02 AM

£500K to repair this lock, that's a lot more that I thought it would be. 


  • 0
Les D
Blue Pearl

www.electricgatesinhertfordshire.co.uk
www.hertselectricgates.co.uk




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users